Our administrator wrote: "Of course you are/were
allowed to respond, if you keep it non-personal ..."
But, then....
Various members posted their *very personal*
feelings about Dan's departure.
Including this one....
bornloser1537 wrote: "Sounds like a little bit of
childish whining here...."
So....
Why must Dan Paymar "keep it non-personal" when
others on the list may write whatever they want?
BTW, I still don't understand why this list has a
"keep it non-personal" rule, anyway. It's very
subjective and cannot be enforced. If you banned
each member after they posted a personal comment,
this group's membership would contain one member,
the administrator.
ยทยทยท
On 12/15/05, bornloser1537 <bornloser1537@y...> wrote:
Sounds like a little bit of childish whining here, but I guess that we
will all have to get through this without you......bl
--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, Dan Paymar <Dan@O...> wrote:
>
> To all my friends here,
>
> Unfortunately, that also means that I will not be able to offer
> specials here as I have done a couple times in the past.
>
> Best regards,
> Dan
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]