vpFREE2 Forums

Keep out of state ID or become official local?

Thanks, appreciate it!

···

--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "mroejacks" <rgmustain@...> wrote:

--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "xxxent" <xxxent@> wrote:
> Thanks for the info. How many casinos offer bounce back cash? Are
> we talking mainly locals joints or strip properties also?
>

You can find this info in the data base at:

http://members.cox.net/vpfree/LV.htm

Also, I believe a local is generally considered a resident of Clark
county. However, different casinos may handle this differently. It
really wouldn't make much sense to consider a resident of Laughlin a
local in Las Vegas.

Dick

>
> I moved to Vegas earlier in the year and kept my ID from my home

state

> and continued to use my home state address with all slot clubs,

etc.

> My mail gets forwarded to me here so it's not a problem, it just

takes

> an extra day or two to get mail.
>
> My question is should I keep my home state ID or get a NV ID and

change

> my address with casinos. Are locals discriminated against on

comps or

> do they get better benefits? Or doesn't it matter at all?

Depending on which state you moved from, I'd think that avoiding

state

income tax would be a big deciding factor? I came from a state with
6.85% income tax and no way to write off gambling losses against

wins.

I couldn't wait to get down to the DMV and get my Nevada license and
auto registration to begin establishing residency. All of our income
is now state income tax free. With both of us receiving generous
pension payments, our net income is substantially greater not paying
that 6.85% to the state each year.

We also enjoy continuous multiple points days and bounceback cash
which are not available to non-residents.

And that is a very good point.

···

--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "staninnv" <arnot@...> wrote:

--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "xxxent" <xxxent@> wrote:

IF he looks foolish then how do you look for not even having a clue
what the facts are?

···

--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, Bill Coleman <vphobby2@...> wrote:

Disagreeing with facts only serves to make you look foolish.

Also, the English language does not have a gender neutral pronoun.
The male is often used when gender is unknown. I'm surprised you
didn't know that.

If you wish to continue this email me privately. I probably won't
bother to respond but you never know.

At 04:57 PM 9/4/2006, you wrote:
>Just for the record....
>I disagree with everything you just posted.
>
>BTW, xxxent never indicated whether they are a man or woman.
>Yet, both you and timmer assume that they are male. And, as
>xxxent previously said, "....you know what they say when you
>assume...."

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Children!

I swear, I will turn this mailing list around RIGHT NOW!

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

···

On 9/5/06, xxxent <xxxent@yahoo.com> wrote:

IF he looks foolish then how do you look for not even having a clue
what the facts are?