I have noticed more and more that when players
report the casino's vp inventory they will say,
"all they have is 9/6 Jacks or Better".
With the right comps, cashback and bounceback is
this still not a good play? Or is it the fact
that we are bored with the strategy after all
these years and want games with the big bang for
quads to test our skills? Any thoughts? Colin
Jacks or better, the black sheep?
There's probably a bit of elitism in the way people discuss 9/6 JoB
here, because the game is so simple and the return relatively paltry.
It takes a lot of cashback, comps, and other perks to get a 99.5% game
up to the 101%+ that many of us look to as a prerequisite for play. At
least in my case, I feel a lot better about myself (smarter, more
likely to succeed, etc.) playing 10/7 Double Bonus at 100.2% + mailers
+ cashback + comps.
···
________________________________________
Peppermillionaire
Visit Wiseguys.com for a free $5,000
football betting contest, an inexpensive
line service, and more! www.wiseguys.com
I always thought it was because Jacks or Better is at the bottom end of the
Full Pay spectrum.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
···
On 8/2/06, luckvpg <lcolinandmarie@aol.com> wrote:
I have noticed more and more that when players
report the casino's vp inventory they will say,
"all they have is 9/6 Jacks or Better".
With the right comps, cashback and bounceback is
this still not a good play? Or is it the fact
that we are bored with the strategy after all
these years and want games with the big bang for
quads to test our skills? Any thoughts? Colin