Now that casino ATM's charge up to $3.75 (Station's) in addition to your banks own fees (if applicable) markers are a way to bypass these outrageous fees (FWIW these fees are shared by the ATM and the casino) . Of course, responsible usage of markers as with ATM cash, check cashing privilege, or cash you bring is the responsibility of the gambler.
> > First let me state the number of times I asked for a casino loan I
> > can count on one hand excluding my thumb.
>
> Is getting an interest free loan ever a bad idea?
ckonwin wrote:
> Getting the marker is never a bad idea. The same can't be said about
> how the maker is used. For example, using a marker to play above
> your bankroll is rarely a good idea and using a market to play enough
> to wipe out your roll is never a good idea.
Excellent observations.
I'll note, however, that the short duration of a marker and the fact
that it's likely used in lieu of drawing on low earning funds makes
the "interest free" aspect a rather limited value consideration.
Markers are of greatest value when carrying cash for play is a
relatively unattractive prospect (perhaps in lieu of carrying $5K or
perhaps $10K+ to Vegas to protect against sharply adverse play luck
that one is willing to bankroll).
However, in the example cited here, more modest play is involved and I
suggest that as a matter of discipline it's more desirable to simply
arrive at the casino with the maximum cash that one is willing to risk.
As ck's remarks would suggest, there's a certain urge to chase your
losses in the heat of the moment. A credit line that makes funds
available beyond what one would otherwise risk is an invitation for
gambler's remorse.
- Harry
···
Harry Porter <harry.porter@verizon.net> wrote: BANDSTAND54@ wrote:
---------------------------------
Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with Yahoo! Search.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]