vpFREE2 Forums

Iraq - by the numbers.

#1

Hey Tommy, nice coalition.
Facts is facts. You ask for them, you get 'em.

Which countries are providing military support

United States 150,000*
Britain 8,530
Albania 70
Australia 850
Azerbaijan 150
Bulgaria 455
Czech Rep. 92
Denmark 510
Dominican Rep. 300
El Salvador 360
Estonia 55
Georgia 150
Hungary 300
Italy 2,700
Japan 1,000
Kazakhstan 25
Latvia 120
Lithuania 105
Macedonia 28
Moldova 25
Mongolia 180
Netherlands 1,263
New Zealand 60
Nicaragua 115
Norway 150
Poland 2,400
Portugal 120
Romania 730
Singapore 200
Slovakia 105
South Korea 675 (3,000 on way)
Thailand 460
Tonga 44
Ukraine 1,700

#2

Didn't get a response to this one Tommy boy. I'm sure that you have
something uplifting to say about a war we are essentially fighting
alone.

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "John" <three2theroyal@y...>
wrote:

···

Hey Tommy, nice coalition.
Facts is facts. You ask for them, you get 'em.

Which countries are providing military support

United States 150,000*
Britain 8,530
Albania 70
Australia 850
Azerbaijan 150
Bulgaria 455
Czech Rep. 92
Denmark 510
Dominican Rep. 300
El Salvador 360
Estonia 55
Georgia 150
Hungary 300
Italy 2,700
Japan 1,000
Kazakhstan 25
Latvia 120
Lithuania 105
Macedonia 28
Moldova 25
Mongolia 180
Netherlands 1,263
New Zealand 60
Nicaragua 115
Norway 150
Poland 2,400
Portugal 120
Romania 730
Singapore 200
Slovakia 105
South Korea 675 (3,000 on way)
Thailand 460
Tonga 44
Ukraine 1,700

#3

I'm sorry Mud Boy Johhny. I didn't see this one.

Looks like about 25000 or so troops.

I must be getting old. I could have sworn it was Pres Bush that
declared war on terror because of an attack on us.

Maybe he should have told the American people we would wage a war if
we could get enough countries to back us. We'll take revenge for
those 3000 lives when we get a world consesus.

We can't really count on the UN at this point they're in CYA mode
trying to get out of the scandal of taking Iraqi oil money for bribes.

You know about the UN right John Boy? THe ones you want permission
from before you do anything to upset world opinion. Those same ones
you trusted to tell the truth about Iraq. The ones lining theirv
pockets with oil money. One question while we're on this subject Ol
John Boy. You scream about corruption and money grubbing with Enron.
Why nothing about the UN scandal? It dwarfs Enron. Maybe because
those dorks you cut and paste from don't have anything on their
website for you to parrot?

I'll give Bush a call right now. How many nations and how many troops
do you think we need to revenge our dead before you consider it ok?
Let me know. Bush likes to turn in early and I hate to call him after
he's in bed. I'm sure he won't mind knowing it's on your behalf that
I'm calling but, I just don't like to.

Seriously puke. Thank God for all those who have joined with us in
this fight. 25000 brave soldiers helping to protect your chicken-shit
useless butt.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "John" <three2theroyal@y...> wrote:

Didn't get a response to this one Tommy boy. I'm sure that you have
something uplifting to say about a war we are essentially fighting
alone.

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "John" <three2theroyal@y...>
wrote:
>
> Hey Tommy, nice coalition.
> Facts is facts. You ask for them, you get 'em.
>
> Which countries are providing military support
>
> United States 150,000*
> Britain 8,530
> Albania 70
> Australia 850
> Azerbaijan 150
> Bulgaria 455
> Czech Rep. 92
> Denmark 510
> Dominican Rep. 300
> El Salvador 360
> Estonia 55
> Georgia 150
> Hungary 300
> Italy 2,700
> Japan 1,000
> Kazakhstan 25
> Latvia 120
> Lithuania 105
> Macedonia 28
> Moldova 25
> Mongolia 180
> Netherlands 1,263
> New Zealand 60
> Nicaragua 115
> Norway 150
> Poland 2,400
> Portugal 120
> Romania 730
> Singapore 200
> Slovakia 105
> South Korea 675 (3,000 on way)
> Thailand 460
> Tonga 44
> Ukraine 1,700

#4

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "John" <three2theroyal@y...>

wrote:

I'm sorry Mud Boy Johhny. I didn't see this one.

Looks like about 25000 or so troops.

I must be getting old. I could have sworn it was Pres Bush that
declared war on terror because of an attack on us.

Come on Tom. Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11. Even you know that.

Maybe he should have told the American people we would wage a war

if

we could get enough countries to back us.

That's what he said he would do. War as a last resort. Instead his
only choice. Using lies for reasons, nothing but lies.

We'll take revenge for
those 3000 lives when we get a world consesus.

That's about as smart as killing Mexicans or Japanese. Iraq had
nothing to do with 9/11. Hello...anybody home?

We can't really count on the UN at this point they're in CYA mode
trying to get out of the scandal of taking Iraqi oil money for

bribes.

Not relevant in 3/2003.

You know about the UN right John Boy? THe ones you want permission
from before you do anything to upset world opinion. Those same

ones

you trusted to tell the truth about Iraq.

Actually, I trusted my government to tell me the truth about Iraq,
but all they did was lie.

The ones lining theirv
pockets with oil money.

If you had bothered to read the posts while you were hiding out you
would have seen that American interests had squandered $8.2 billion.
Sorry, not the UN.

One question while we're on this subject Ol
John Boy. You scream about corruption and money grubbing with

Enron.

Why nothing about the UN scandal?

It doesn't effect me. The utility where I live has litigation
against enron for price fixing. That cost me money, just like this
obsene war is. You can't be this stupid.

It dwarfs Enron. Maybe because
those dorks you cut and paste from don't have anything on their
website for you to parrot?

I'll give Bush a call right now.

You can probably get the number from Singer. He's the prez bud.

How many nations and how many troops
do you think we need to revenge our dead before you consider it

ok?

I think that we should be looking for Bin Laden. I read somewhere
that he was behind the attacks.

Let me know. Bush likes to turn in early and I hate to call him

after

he's in bed. I'm sure he won't mind knowing it's on your behalf

that

I'm calling but, I just don't like to.

Seriously puke. Thank God for all those who have joined with us in
this fight. 25000 brave soldiers helping to protect your chicken-

shit

useless butt.

If we never attacked Iraq my life would have changed only by having
thousands more happy families to share my country with. I was not
threatened by Iraq, neither was my country.

>
> Didn't get a response to this one Tommy boy. I'm sure that you

have

> something uplifting to say about a war we are essentially

fighting

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "tghysel" <tghysel@y...> wrote:

> alone.
>
> --- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "John" <three2theroyal@y...>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hey Tommy, nice coalition.
> > Facts is facts. You ask for them, you get 'em.
> >
> > Which countries are providing military support
> >
> > United States 150,000*
> > Britain 8,530
> > Albania 70
> > Australia 850
> > Azerbaijan 150
> > Bulgaria 455
> > Czech Rep. 92
> > Denmark 510
> > Dominican Rep. 300
> > El Salvador 360
> > Estonia 55
> > Georgia 150
> > Hungary 300
> > Italy 2,700
> > Japan 1,000
> > Kazakhstan 25
> > Latvia 120
> > Lithuania 105
> > Macedonia 28
> > Moldova 25
> > Mongolia 180
> > Netherlands 1,263
> > New Zealand 60
> > Nicaragua 115
> > Norway 150
> > Poland 2,400
> > Portugal 120
> > Romania 730
> > Singapore 200
> > Slovakia 105
> > South Korea 675 (3,000 on way)
> > Thailand 460
> > Tonga 44
> > Ukraine 1,700

#5

I heard Bill O'Reilly say last night that the only satisfaction the
democrats have of late is in finding new ways to manufacture
criticizms of Bush and the Republicans. He called it 'a product of
losing' after getting the old heave-ho from the American people.

I could have sent that into him, but it's for sure millions of others
already have. In the meantime, as John sours and wails over Kerry the
Coward being dumped into the trash and as the USA continues on it's
position of strength and righteousness, have I said how much i enjoy
watching the liberal fairies agonize and waste their time dreaming
about 'how it cound have/should have been'? And did I say how much it
warms my heart every time a loser like you exacerbates your agony by
looking for liberal points of view that mean nothing to this country?
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "John" <three2theroyal@y...> wrote:

> I must be getting old. I could have sworn it was Pres Bush that
> declared war on terror because of an attack on us.

Come on Tom. Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11. Even you know that.

#6

What the sex offender has to say is of little import to me, as is
what you have to say. I have bested you at every turn and am getting
tired of your same old responses. Go write another book, eBay needs
the business.

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "John" <three2theroyal@y...>

wrote:

>
> > I must be getting old. I could have sworn it was Pres Bush

that

> > declared war on terror because of an attack on us.
>
> Come on Tom. Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11. Even you know

that.

I heard Bill O'Reilly say last night that the only satisfaction

the

democrats have of late is in finding new ways to manufacture
criticizms of Bush and the Republicans. He called it 'a product of
losing' after getting the old heave-ho from the American people.

I could have sent that into him, but it's for sure millions of

others

already have. In the meantime, as John sours and wails over Kerry

the

Coward being dumped into the trash and as the USA continues on

it's

position of strength and righteousness, have I said how much i

enjoy

watching the liberal fairies agonize and waste their time dreaming
about 'how it cound have/should have been'? And did I say how much

it

warms my heart every time a loser like you exacerbates your agony

by

looking for liberal points of view that mean nothing to this

country?

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "deadin7" <deadin7@y...> wrote:

HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

#7

What the sex offender has to say is of little import to me, as is
what you have to say. I have bested you at every turn and am

getting tired of your same old responses. Go write another book, eBay
needs the business.

I thought you dealt specifically in facts? You provide the same type
of cloud cover over your posts that Dicky does. I take you're
accusing O'Reily of being some kind of sex offender. Why don't you go
to the Internet and pull up that story, and show the complete issue
from start to finish. Then we'll see who besides you labels him as
one of those offenders.

I understand you're agony at my truthful replies about your sour
grapes. Please do keep showing your irritability. It only adds to my
satisfaction that a coward like you is getting his due BIG TIME!!!!
HAHAHAHA!!!!

>
> --- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "John" <three2theroyal@y...>
wrote:
> >
> > > I must be getting old. I could have sworn it was Pres Bush
that
> > > declared war on terror because of an attack on us.
> >
> > Come on Tom. Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11. Even you know
that.
>
> I heard Bill O'Reilly say last night that the only satisfaction
the
> democrats have of late is in finding new ways to manufacture
> criticizms of Bush and the Republicans. He called it 'a product

of

> losing' after getting the old heave-ho from the American people.
>
> I could have sent that into him, but it's for sure millions of
others
> already have. In the meantime, as John sours and wails over Kerry
the
> Coward being dumped into the trash and as the USA continues on
it's
> position of strength and righteousness, have I said how much i
enjoy
> watching the liberal fairies agonize and waste their time

dreaming

> about 'how it cound have/should have been'? And did I say how

much

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "John" <three2theroyal@y...> wrote:

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "deadin7" <deadin7@y...> wrote:
it
> warms my heart every time a loser like you exacerbates your agony
by
> looking for liberal points of view that mean nothing to this
country?
> HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

#8

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "John" <three2theroyal@y...>

wrote:

>
> What the sex offender has to say is of little import to me, as

is

> what you have to say. I have bested you at every turn and am
getting tired of your same old responses. Go write another book,

eBay

needs the business.

I thought you dealt specifically in facts? You provide the same

type

of cloud cover over your posts that Dicky does. I take you're
accusing O'Reily of being some kind of sex offender. Why don't you

go

to the Internet and pull up that story, and show the complete

issue

from start to finish. Then we'll see who besides you labels him as
one of those offenders.

I understand you're agony at my truthful replies about your sour
grapes. Please do keep showing your irritability. It only adds to

my

satisfaction that a coward like you is getting his due BIG

TIME!!!!

HAHAHAHA!!!!
>

Old news about a sad pervert but ask and you shall receive. Here's a
brief description. The rest can be accessed at:

http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/1013043mackris1.html

O'Reilly Hit With Sex Harass Suit

Female Fox coworker details lewd behavior of cable TV star

OCTOBER 13--Hours after Bill O'Reilly accused her of a multimillion
dollar shakedown attempt, a female Fox News producer fired back at
the TV star today, filing a lawsuit claiming that he subjected her
to repeated instances of sexual harassment and spoke often, and
explicitly, to her about phone sex, vibrators, threesomes,
masturbation, the loss of his virginity, and sexual fantasies. Below
you'll find a copy of Andrea Mackris's complaint, an incredible page-
turner that quotes O'Reilly, 55, on all sorts of lewd matters. Based
on the extensive quotations cited in the complaint, it appears a
safe bet that Mackris, 33, recorded some of O'Reilly's more steamy
soliloquies. For example, we direct you to his Caribbean shower
fantasies. While we suggest reading the entire document, TSG will
point you to interesting sections on a Thailand sex show, Al
Franken, and the climax of one August 2004 phone conversation. (22
pages)

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "deadin7" <deadin7@y...> wrote:

#9

> > What the sex offender has to say is of little import to me.

I thought you dealt specifically in facts? You provide the same

type of cloud cover over your posts that Dicky does. I take you're
> accusing O'Reily of being some kind of sex offender. Why don't

you go to the Internet and pull up that story, and show the complete

issue from start to finish. Then we'll see who besides you labels

him as one of those offenders.

>
> I understand you're agony at my truthful replies about your sour
> grapes. Please do keep showing your irritability. It only adds to
my satisfaction that a coward like you is getting his due BIG
TIME!!!! HAHAHAHA!!!!
> >

Old news about a sad pervert but ask and you shall receive. Here's

a brief description. The rest can be accessed at:

http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/1013043mackris1.html

I told you to post the facts in their entirety, and I also expeted
you'd fudge it up by trying to be incomplete and nebulous. You chose
the latter--as if that wasn't expected of a liberal without a
paddle. "It appears a safe bet that conversations were recorded" is
supposed to be reality? You also conveniently left out the part where
the entire issue was dropped and all allegations were expunged. Leave
it to a critic to not recognize all aspects in order to continue on
in his make-believe world. And to add to your misery, O'Reilly is the
most watched newscaster on the tube in history. Guess your liberals
friends--and the slut who tried and failed to get money from him--
have one more reason to play follow-the-leader and take a self-
inflicted bullet in the head at ground zero. God Bless redemption!

O'Reilly Hit With Sex Harass Suit

Female Fox coworker details lewd behavior of cable TV star

OCTOBER 13--Hours after Bill O'Reilly accused her of a multimillion
dollar shakedown attempt, a female Fox News producer fired back at
the TV star today, filing a lawsuit claiming that he subjected her
to repeated instances of sexual harassment and spoke often, and
explicitly, to her about phone sex, vibrators, threesomes,
masturbation, the loss of his virginity, and sexual fantasies.

Below

you'll find a copy of Andrea Mackris's complaint, an incredible

page-

turner that quotes O'Reilly, 55, on all sorts of lewd matters.

Based

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "John" <three2theroyal@y...> wrote:

on the extensive quotations cited in the complaint, it appears a
safe bet that Mackris, 33, recorded some of O'Reilly's more steamy
soliloquies. For example, we direct you to his Caribbean shower
fantasies. While we suggest reading the entire document, TSG will
point you to interesting sections on a Thailand sex show, Al
Franken, and the climax of one August 2004 phone conversation. (22
pages)

#10

You are boring me, singer. The truth is right in front of your
balding head and you won't see it. It must be painful to watch all
your heroes be proved liars and thieves. Something new and
interesting, if you can.

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "John" <three2theroyal@y...>

wrote:

>
> > > What the sex offender has to say is of little import to me.

I thought you dealt specifically in facts? You provide the same
> type of cloud cover over your posts that Dicky does. I take

you're

> > accusing O'Reily of being some kind of sex offender. Why don't
you go to the Internet and pull up that story, and show the

complete

> issue from start to finish. Then we'll see who besides you

labels

him as one of those offenders.
> >
> > I understand you're agony at my truthful replies about your

sour

> > grapes. Please do keep showing your irritability. It only adds

to

> my satisfaction that a coward like you is getting his due BIG
> TIME!!!! HAHAHAHA!!!!
> > >
>
> Old news about a sad pervert but ask and you shall receive.

Here's

a brief description. The rest can be accessed at:
> http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/1013043mackris1.html

I told you to post the facts in their entirety, and I also expeted
you'd fudge it up by trying to be incomplete and nebulous. You

chose

the latter--as if that wasn't expected of a liberal without a
paddle. "It appears a safe bet that conversations were recorded"

is

supposed to be reality? You also conveniently left out the part

where

the entire issue was dropped and all allegations were expunged.

Leave

it to a critic to not recognize all aspects in order to continue

on

in his make-believe world. And to add to your misery, O'Reilly is

the

most watched newscaster on the tube in history. Guess your

liberals

friends--and the slut who tried and failed to get money from him--
have one more reason to play follow-the-leader and take a self-
inflicted bullet in the head at ground zero. God Bless redemption!
>
>
> O'Reilly Hit With Sex Harass Suit
>
> Female Fox coworker details lewd behavior of cable TV star
>
> OCTOBER 13--Hours after Bill O'Reilly accused her of a

multimillion

> dollar shakedown attempt, a female Fox News producer fired back

at

> the TV star today, filing a lawsuit claiming that he subjected

her

> to repeated instances of sexual harassment and spoke often, and
> explicitly, to her about phone sex, vibrators, threesomes,
> masturbation, the loss of his virginity, and sexual fantasies.
Below
> you'll find a copy of Andrea Mackris's complaint, an incredible
page-
> turner that quotes O'Reilly, 55, on all sorts of lewd matters.
Based
> on the extensive quotations cited in the complaint, it appears a
> safe bet that Mackris, 33, recorded some of O'Reilly's more

steamy

> soliloquies. For example, we direct you to his Caribbean shower
> fantasies. While we suggest reading the entire document, TSG

will

> point you to interesting sections on a Thailand sex show, Al
> Franken, and the climax of one August 2004 phone conversation.

(22

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "deadin7" <deadin7@y...> wrote:

> pages)

#11

You are boring me, singer. The truth is right in front of your
balding head and you won't see it. It must be painful to watch all
your heroes be proved liars and thieves. Something new and
interesting, if you can.

HAHA! To ignore the facts must be eating away at you in order to make
a stretch out of this. Are you able to say the words ALLEGATIONS
RETRACTED & EXPUNGED? Then figure out what exactly that means, even
if it means pulling out that dictionary you haven't used in 40 years.

>
> --- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "John" <three2theroyal@y...>
wrote:
> >
> > > > What the sex offender has to say is of little import to me.
>
> I thought you dealt specifically in facts? You provide the same
> > type of cloud cover over your posts that Dicky does. I take
you're
> > > accusing O'Reily of being some kind of sex offender. Why

don't

> you go to the Internet and pull up that story, and show the
complete
> > issue from start to finish. Then we'll see who besides you
labels
> him as one of those offenders.
> > >
> > > I understand you're agony at my truthful replies about your
sour
> > > grapes. Please do keep showing your irritability. It only

adds

to
> > my satisfaction that a coward like you is getting his due BIG
> > TIME!!!! HAHAHAHA!!!!
> > > >
> >
> > Old news about a sad pervert but ask and you shall receive.
Here's
> a brief description. The rest can be accessed at:
> > http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/1013043mackris1.html
>
> I told you to post the facts in their entirety, and I also

expeted

> you'd fudge it up by trying to be incomplete and nebulous. You
chose
> the latter--as if that wasn't expected of a liberal without a
> paddle. "It appears a safe bet that conversations were recorded"
is
> supposed to be reality? You also conveniently left out the part
where
> the entire issue was dropped and all allegations were expunged.
Leave
> it to a critic to not recognize all aspects in order to continue
on
> in his make-believe world. And to add to your misery, O'Reilly is
the
> most watched newscaster on the tube in history. Guess your
liberals
> friends--and the slut who tried and failed to get money from him--
> have one more reason to play follow-the-leader and take a self-
> inflicted bullet in the head at ground zero. God Bless redemption!
> >
> >
> > O'Reilly Hit With Sex Harass Suit
> >
> > Female Fox coworker details lewd behavior of cable TV star
> >
> > OCTOBER 13--Hours after Bill O'Reilly accused her of a
multimillion
> > dollar shakedown attempt, a female Fox News producer fired back
at
> > the TV star today, filing a lawsuit claiming that he subjected
her
> > to repeated instances of sexual harassment and spoke often, and
> > explicitly, to her about phone sex, vibrators, threesomes,
> > masturbation, the loss of his virginity, and sexual fantasies.
> Below
> > you'll find a copy of Andrea Mackris's complaint, an incredible
> page-
> > turner that quotes O'Reilly, 55, on all sorts of lewd matters.
> Based
> > on the extensive quotations cited in the complaint, it appears

a

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "John" <three2theroyal@y...> wrote:

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "deadin7" <deadin7@y...> wrote:
> > safe bet that Mackris, 33, recorded some of O'Reilly's more
steamy
> > soliloquies. For example, we direct you to his Caribbean shower
> > fantasies. While we suggest reading the entire document, TSG
will
> > point you to interesting sections on a Thailand sex show, Al
> > Franken, and the climax of one August 2004 phone conversation.
(22
> > pages)

#12

When the pervert settled to avoid going to court, that's all the
validation I need. You have a lot of nerve talking about facts sinc
you never, ever present any. Go use your rogaine and let someone
with an analytical mind post.

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "John" <three2theroyal@y...>

wrote:

>
> You are boring me, singer. The truth is right in front of your
> balding head and you won't see it. It must be painful to watch

all

> your heroes be proved liars and thieves. Something new and
> interesting, if you can.

HAHA! To ignore the facts must be eating away at you in order to

make

a stretch out of this. Are you able to say the words ALLEGATIONS
RETRACTED & EXPUNGED? Then figure out what exactly that means,

even

if it means pulling out that dictionary you haven't used in 40

years.

>
> --- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "deadin7" <deadin7@y...>

wrote:

> >
> > --- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "John"

<three2theroyal@y...>

> wrote:
> > >
> > > > > What the sex offender has to say is of little import to

me.

> >
> > I thought you dealt specifically in facts? You provide the

same

> > > type of cloud cover over your posts that Dicky does. I take
> you're
> > > > accusing O'Reily of being some kind of sex offender. Why
don't
> > you go to the Internet and pull up that story, and show the
> complete
> > > issue from start to finish. Then we'll see who besides you
> labels
> > him as one of those offenders.
> > > >
> > > > I understand you're agony at my truthful replies about

your

> sour
> > > > grapes. Please do keep showing your irritability. It only
adds
> to
> > > my satisfaction that a coward like you is getting his due

BIG

> > > TIME!!!! HAHAHAHA!!!!
> > > > >
> > >
> > > Old news about a sad pervert but ask and you shall receive.
> Here's
> > a brief description. The rest can be accessed at:
> > > http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/1013043mackris1.html
> >
> > I told you to post the facts in their entirety, and I also
expeted
> > you'd fudge it up by trying to be incomplete and nebulous. You
> chose
> > the latter--as if that wasn't expected of a liberal without a
> > paddle. "It appears a safe bet that conversations were

recorded"

> is
> > supposed to be reality? You also conveniently left out the

part

> where
> > the entire issue was dropped and all allegations were

expunged.

> Leave
> > it to a critic to not recognize all aspects in order to

continue

> on
> > in his make-believe world. And to add to your misery, O'Reilly

is

> the
> > most watched newscaster on the tube in history. Guess your
> liberals
> > friends--and the slut who tried and failed to get money from

him--

> > have one more reason to play follow-the-leader and take a self-
> > inflicted bullet in the head at ground zero. God Bless

redemption!

> > >
> > >
> > > O'Reilly Hit With Sex Harass Suit
> > >
> > > Female Fox coworker details lewd behavior of cable TV star
> > >
> > > OCTOBER 13--Hours after Bill O'Reilly accused her of a
> multimillion
> > > dollar shakedown attempt, a female Fox News producer fired

back

> at
> > > the TV star today, filing a lawsuit claiming that he

subjected

> her
> > > to repeated instances of sexual harassment and spoke often,

and

> > > explicitly, to her about phone sex, vibrators, threesomes,
> > > masturbation, the loss of his virginity, and sexual

fantasies.

> > Below
> > > you'll find a copy of Andrea Mackris's complaint, an

incredible

> > page-
> > > turner that quotes O'Reilly, 55, on all sorts of lewd

matters.

> > Based
> > > on the extensive quotations cited in the complaint, it

appears

a
> > > safe bet that Mackris, 33, recorded some of O'Reilly's more
> steamy
> > > soliloquies. For example, we direct you to his Caribbean

shower

> > > fantasies. While we suggest reading the entire document, TSG
> will
> > > point you to interesting sections on a Thailand sex show, Al
> > > Franken, and the climax of one August 2004 phone

conversation.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "deadin7" <deadin7@y...> wrote:

> (22
> > > pages)

#13

When the pervert settled to avoid going to court, that's all the
validation I need. You have a lot of nerve talking about facts sinc
you never, ever present any. Go use your rogaine and let someone
with an analytical mind post.

Here's a flash--and go look the facts up cause that's all you know
how to do. The settlement was solely an agreement to drop everything
on both sides. No one knows whether she made this up or not, and
whether it's because of money or deposition-requirements, it became a
non-event at that moment. And if that's "all the validation you
needed" I'd say you've got that liberal disease creeping up on you
once again. Facts, Johnny Boy, Facts.....

>
> --- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "John" <three2theroyal@y...>
wrote:
> >
> > You are boring me, singer. The truth is right in front of your
> > balding head and you won't see it. It must be painful to watch
all
> > your heroes be proved liars and thieves. Something new and
> > interesting, if you can.
>
> HAHA! To ignore the facts must be eating away at you in order to
make
> a stretch out of this. Are you able to say the words ALLEGATIONS
> RETRACTED & EXPUNGED? Then figure out what exactly that means,
even
> if it means pulling out that dictionary you haven't used in 40
years.
> >
> > --- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "deadin7" <deadin7@y...>
wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "John"
<three2theroyal@y...>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > > What the sex offender has to say is of little import to
me.
> > >
> > > I thought you dealt specifically in facts? You provide the
same
> > > > type of cloud cover over your posts that Dicky does. I take
> > you're
> > > > > accusing O'Reily of being some kind of sex offender. Why
> don't
> > > you go to the Internet and pull up that story, and show the
> > complete
> > > > issue from start to finish. Then we'll see who besides you
> > labels
> > > him as one of those offenders.
> > > > >
> > > > > I understand you're agony at my truthful replies about
your
> > sour
> > > > > grapes. Please do keep showing your irritability. It only
> adds
> > to
> > > > my satisfaction that a coward like you is getting his due
BIG
> > > > TIME!!!! HAHAHAHA!!!!
> > > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Old news about a sad pervert but ask and you shall receive.
> > Here's
> > > a brief description. The rest can be accessed at:
> > > > http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/1013043mackris1.html
> > >
> > > I told you to post the facts in their entirety, and I also
> expeted
> > > you'd fudge it up by trying to be incomplete and nebulous.

You

> > chose
> > > the latter--as if that wasn't expected of a liberal without a
> > > paddle. "It appears a safe bet that conversations were
recorded"
> > is
> > > supposed to be reality? You also conveniently left out the
part
> > where
> > > the entire issue was dropped and all allegations were
expunged.
> > Leave
> > > it to a critic to not recognize all aspects in order to
continue
> > on
> > > in his make-believe world. And to add to your misery,

O'Reilly

is
> > the
> > > most watched newscaster on the tube in history. Guess your
> > liberals
> > > friends--and the slut who tried and failed to get money from
him--
> > > have one more reason to play follow-the-leader and take a

self-

> > > inflicted bullet in the head at ground zero. God Bless
redemption!
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > O'Reilly Hit With Sex Harass Suit
> > > >
> > > > Female Fox coworker details lewd behavior of cable TV star
> > > >
> > > > OCTOBER 13--Hours after Bill O'Reilly accused her of a
> > multimillion
> > > > dollar shakedown attempt, a female Fox News producer fired
back
> > at
> > > > the TV star today, filing a lawsuit claiming that he
subjected
> > her
> > > > to repeated instances of sexual harassment and spoke often,
and
> > > > explicitly, to her about phone sex, vibrators, threesomes,
> > > > masturbation, the loss of his virginity, and sexual
fantasies.
> > > Below
> > > > you'll find a copy of Andrea Mackris's complaint, an
incredible
> > > page-
> > > > turner that quotes O'Reilly, 55, on all sorts of lewd
matters.
> > > Based
> > > > on the extensive quotations cited in the complaint, it
appears
> a
> > > > safe bet that Mackris, 33, recorded some of O'Reilly's more
> > steamy
> > > > soliloquies. For example, we direct you to his Caribbean
shower
> > > > fantasies. While we suggest reading the entire document,

TSG

> > will
> > > > point you to interesting sections on a Thailand sex show,

Al

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "John" <three2theroyal@y...> wrote:

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "deadin7" <deadin7@y...> wrote:
> > > > Franken, and the climax of one August 2004 phone
conversation.
> > (22
> > > > pages)

#14

OK, I know that I would pay millions to have things dropped if I was
innocent. You better get you eyes checked, you can't see truth.

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "John" <three2theroyal@y...>

wrote:

>
> When the pervert settled to avoid going to court, that's all the
> validation I need. You have a lot of nerve talking about facts

sinc

> you never, ever present any. Go use your rogaine and let someone
> with an analytical mind post.

Here's a flash--and go look the facts up cause that's all you know
how to do. The settlement was solely an agreement to drop

everything

on both sides. No one knows whether she made this up or not, and
whether it's because of money or deposition-requirements, it

became a

non-event at that moment. And if that's "all the validation you
needed" I'd say you've got that liberal disease creeping up on you
once again. Facts, Johnny Boy, Facts.....
>
> --- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "deadin7" <deadin7@y...>

wrote:

> >
> > --- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "John"

<three2theroyal@y...>

> wrote:
> > >
> > > You are boring me, singer. The truth is right in front of

your

> > > balding head and you won't see it. It must be painful to

watch

> all
> > > your heroes be proved liars and thieves. Something new and
> > > interesting, if you can.
> >
> > HAHA! To ignore the facts must be eating away at you in order

to

> make
> > a stretch out of this. Are you able to say the words

ALLEGATIONS

> > RETRACTED & EXPUNGED? Then figure out what exactly that means,
> even
> > if it means pulling out that dictionary you haven't used in 40
> years.
> > >
> > > --- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "deadin7" <deadin7@y...>
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > --- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "John"
> <three2theroyal@y...>
> > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > > What the sex offender has to say is of little import

to

> me.
> > > >
> > > > I thought you dealt specifically in facts? You provide

the

> same
> > > > > type of cloud cover over your posts that Dicky does. I

take

> > > you're
> > > > > > accusing O'Reily of being some kind of sex offender.

Why

> > don't
> > > > you go to the Internet and pull up that story, and show

the

> > > complete
> > > > > issue from start to finish. Then we'll see who besides

you

> > > labels
> > > > him as one of those offenders.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I understand you're agony at my truthful replies about
> your
> > > sour
> > > > > > grapes. Please do keep showing your irritability. It

only

> > adds
> > > to
> > > > > my satisfaction that a coward like you is getting his

due

> BIG
> > > > > TIME!!!! HAHAHAHA!!!!
> > > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Old news about a sad pervert but ask and you shall

receive.

> > > Here's
> > > > a brief description. The rest can be accessed at:
> > > > > http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/1013043mackris1.html
> > > >
> > > > I told you to post the facts in their entirety, and I also
> > expeted
> > > > you'd fudge it up by trying to be incomplete and nebulous.
You
> > > chose
> > > > the latter--as if that wasn't expected of a liberal

without a

> > > > paddle. "It appears a safe bet that conversations were
> recorded"
> > > is
> > > > supposed to be reality? You also conveniently left out the
> part
> > > where
> > > > the entire issue was dropped and all allegations were
> expunged.
> > > Leave
> > > > it to a critic to not recognize all aspects in order to
> continue
> > > on
> > > > in his make-believe world. And to add to your misery,
O'Reilly
> is
> > > the
> > > > most watched newscaster on the tube in history. Guess your
> > > liberals
> > > > friends--and the slut who tried and failed to get money

from

> him--
> > > > have one more reason to play follow-the-leader and take a
self-
> > > > inflicted bullet in the head at ground zero. God Bless
> redemption!
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > O'Reilly Hit With Sex Harass Suit
> > > > >
> > > > > Female Fox coworker details lewd behavior of cable TV

star

> > > > >
> > > > > OCTOBER 13--Hours after Bill O'Reilly accused her of a
> > > multimillion
> > > > > dollar shakedown attempt, a female Fox News producer

fired

> back
> > > at
> > > > > the TV star today, filing a lawsuit claiming that he
> subjected
> > > her
> > > > > to repeated instances of sexual harassment and spoke

often,

> and
> > > > > explicitly, to her about phone sex, vibrators,

threesomes,

> > > > > masturbation, the loss of his virginity, and sexual
> fantasies.
> > > > Below
> > > > > you'll find a copy of Andrea Mackris's complaint, an
> incredible
> > > > page-
> > > > > turner that quotes O'Reilly, 55, on all sorts of lewd
> matters.
> > > > Based
> > > > > on the extensive quotations cited in the complaint, it
> appears
> > a
> > > > > safe bet that Mackris, 33, recorded some of O'Reilly's

more

> > > steamy
> > > > > soliloquies. For example, we direct you to his Caribbean
> shower
> > > > > fantasies. While we suggest reading the entire document,
TSG
> > > will
> > > > > point you to interesting sections on a Thailand sex

show,

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "deadin7" <deadin7@y...> wrote:

Al
> > > > > Franken, and the climax of one August 2004 phone
> conversation.
> > > (22
> > > > > pages)

#15

I wonder how much she paid to drop everything??

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "John" <three2theroyal@y...>
wrote:

OK, I know that I would pay millions to have things dropped if I

was

innocent. You better get you eyes checked, you can't see truth.

>
> --- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "John" <three2theroyal@y...>
wrote:
> >
> > When the pervert settled to avoid going to court, that's all

the

> > validation I need. You have a lot of nerve talking about facts
sinc
> > you never, ever present any. Go use your rogaine and let

someone

> > with an analytical mind post.
>
> Here's a flash--and go look the facts up cause that's all you

know

> how to do. The settlement was solely an agreement to drop
everything
> on both sides. No one knows whether she made this up or not, and
> whether it's because of money or deposition-requirements, it
became a
> non-event at that moment. And if that's "all the validation you
> needed" I'd say you've got that liberal disease creeping up on

you

> once again. Facts, Johnny Boy, Facts.....
> >
> > --- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "deadin7" <deadin7@y...>
wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "John"
<three2theroyal@y...>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > You are boring me, singer. The truth is right in front of
your
> > > > balding head and you won't see it. It must be painful to
watch
> > all
> > > > your heroes be proved liars and thieves. Something new and
> > > > interesting, if you can.
> > >
> > > HAHA! To ignore the facts must be eating away at you in

order

to
> > make
> > > a stretch out of this. Are you able to say the words
ALLEGATIONS
> > > RETRACTED & EXPUNGED? Then figure out what exactly that

means,

> > even
> > > if it means pulling out that dictionary you haven't used in

40

> > years.
> > > >
> > > > --- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "deadin7"

<deadin7@y...>

> > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > --- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "John"
> > <three2theroyal@y...>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > > What the sex offender has to say is of little

import

to
> > me.
> > > > >
> > > > > I thought you dealt specifically in facts? You provide
the
> > same
> > > > > > type of cloud cover over your posts that Dicky does. I
take
> > > > you're
> > > > > > > accusing O'Reily of being some kind of sex offender.
Why
> > > don't
> > > > > you go to the Internet and pull up that story, and show
the
> > > > complete
> > > > > > issue from start to finish. Then we'll see who besides
you
> > > > labels
> > > > > him as one of those offenders.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I understand you're agony at my truthful replies

about

> > your
> > > > sour
> > > > > > > grapes. Please do keep showing your irritability. It
only
> > > adds
> > > > to
> > > > > > my satisfaction that a coward like you is getting his
due
> > BIG
> > > > > > TIME!!!! HAHAHAHA!!!!
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Old news about a sad pervert but ask and you shall
receive.
> > > > Here's
> > > > > a brief description. The rest can be accessed at:
> > > > > >

http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/1013043mackris1.html

> > > > >
> > > > > I told you to post the facts in their entirety, and I

also

> > > expeted
> > > > > you'd fudge it up by trying to be incomplete and

nebulous.

> You
> > > > chose
> > > > > the latter--as if that wasn't expected of a liberal
without a
> > > > > paddle. "It appears a safe bet that conversations were
> > recorded"
> > > > is
> > > > > supposed to be reality? You also conveniently left out

the

> > part
> > > > where
> > > > > the entire issue was dropped and all allegations were
> > expunged.
> > > > Leave
> > > > > it to a critic to not recognize all aspects in order to
> > continue
> > > > on
> > > > > in his make-believe world. And to add to your misery,
> O'Reilly
> > is
> > > > the
> > > > > most watched newscaster on the tube in history. Guess

your

> > > > liberals
> > > > > friends--and the slut who tried and failed to get money
from
> > him--
> > > > > have one more reason to play follow-the-leader and take

a

> self-
> > > > > inflicted bullet in the head at ground zero. God Bless
> > redemption!
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > O'Reilly Hit With Sex Harass Suit
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Female Fox coworker details lewd behavior of cable TV
star
> > > > > >
> > > > > > OCTOBER 13--Hours after Bill O'Reilly accused her of a
> > > > multimillion
> > > > > > dollar shakedown attempt, a female Fox News producer
fired
> > back
> > > > at
> > > > > > the TV star today, filing a lawsuit claiming that he
> > subjected
> > > > her
> > > > > > to repeated instances of sexual harassment and spoke
often,
> > and
> > > > > > explicitly, to her about phone sex, vibrators,
threesomes,
> > > > > > masturbation, the loss of his virginity, and sexual
> > fantasies.
> > > > > Below
> > > > > > you'll find a copy of Andrea Mackris's complaint, an
> > incredible
> > > > > page-
> > > > > > turner that quotes O'Reilly, 55, on all sorts of lewd
> > matters.
> > > > > Based
> > > > > > on the extensive quotations cited in the complaint, it
> > appears
> > > a
> > > > > > safe bet that Mackris, 33, recorded some of O'Reilly's
more
> > > > steamy
> > > > > > soliloquies. For example, we direct you to his

Caribbean

> > shower
> > > > > > fantasies. While we suggest reading the entire

document,

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "deadin7" <deadin7@y...> wrote:
> TSG
> > > > will
> > > > > > point you to interesting sections on a Thailand sex
show,
> Al
> > > > > > Franken, and the climax of one August 2004 phone
> > conversation.
> > > > (22
> > > > > > pages)

#16

OK, I know that I would pay millions to have things dropped if I

was innocent. You better get you eyes checked, you can't see truth.

As how all liberal phonies react to the truth, you've created another
make-believe scenario that has no more fact associated with it than
one where it's her having to pay him for slander. You know nothing
and neither do I -- except for the FACT that the issue was expunged
and deemed a 'non-issue'. Some day you'll wake up and face reality
and truths, but I suspect it'll only be as you seek forgiveness on
your death bed for being so stupid all your life.

Oh, and your buddy Dicky can't attempt to help you out of this one
right now. Guess where he is??

>
> --- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "John" <three2theroyal@y...>
wrote:
> >
> > When the pervert settled to avoid going to court, that's all

the

> > validation I need. You have a lot of nerve talking about facts
sinc
> > you never, ever present any. Go use your rogaine and let

someone

> > with an analytical mind post.
>
> Here's a flash--and go look the facts up cause that's all you

know

> how to do. The settlement was solely an agreement to drop
everything
> on both sides. No one knows whether she made this up or not, and
> whether it's because of money or deposition-requirements, it
became a
> non-event at that moment. And if that's "all the validation you
> needed" I'd say you've got that liberal disease creeping up on

you

> once again. Facts, Johnny Boy, Facts.....
> >
> > --- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "deadin7" <deadin7@y...>
wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "John"
<three2theroyal@y...>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > You are boring me, singer. The truth is right in front of
your
> > > > balding head and you won't see it. It must be painful to
watch
> > all
> > > > your heroes be proved liars and thieves. Something new and
> > > > interesting, if you can.
> > >
> > > HAHA! To ignore the facts must be eating away at you in order
to
> > make
> > > a stretch out of this. Are you able to say the words
ALLEGATIONS
> > > RETRACTED & EXPUNGED? Then figure out what exactly that

means,

> > even
> > > if it means pulling out that dictionary you haven't used in

40

> > years.
> > > >
> > > > --- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "deadin7" <deadin7@y...>
> > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > --- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "John"
> > <three2theroyal@y...>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > > What the sex offender has to say is of little

import

to
> > me.
> > > > >
> > > > > I thought you dealt specifically in facts? You provide
the
> > same
> > > > > > type of cloud cover over your posts that Dicky does. I
take
> > > > you're
> > > > > > > accusing O'Reily of being some kind of sex offender.
Why
> > > don't
> > > > > you go to the Internet and pull up that story, and show
the
> > > > complete
> > > > > > issue from start to finish. Then we'll see who besides
you
> > > > labels
> > > > > him as one of those offenders.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I understand you're agony at my truthful replies

about

> > your
> > > > sour
> > > > > > > grapes. Please do keep showing your irritability. It
only
> > > adds
> > > > to
> > > > > > my satisfaction that a coward like you is getting his
due
> > BIG
> > > > > > TIME!!!! HAHAHAHA!!!!
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Old news about a sad pervert but ask and you shall
receive.
> > > > Here's
> > > > > a brief description. The rest can be accessed at:
> > > > > >

http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/1013043mackris1.html

> > > > >
> > > > > I told you to post the facts in their entirety, and I

also

> > > expeted
> > > > > you'd fudge it up by trying to be incomplete and

nebulous.

> You
> > > > chose
> > > > > the latter--as if that wasn't expected of a liberal
without a
> > > > > paddle. "It appears a safe bet that conversations were
> > recorded"
> > > > is
> > > > > supposed to be reality? You also conveniently left out

the

> > part
> > > > where
> > > > > the entire issue was dropped and all allegations were
> > expunged.
> > > > Leave
> > > > > it to a critic to not recognize all aspects in order to
> > continue
> > > > on
> > > > > in his make-believe world. And to add to your misery,
> O'Reilly
> > is
> > > > the
> > > > > most watched newscaster on the tube in history. Guess

your

> > > > liberals
> > > > > friends--and the slut who tried and failed to get money
from
> > him--
> > > > > have one more reason to play follow-the-leader and take a
> self-
> > > > > inflicted bullet in the head at ground zero. God Bless
> > redemption!
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > O'Reilly Hit With Sex Harass Suit
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Female Fox coworker details lewd behavior of cable TV
star
> > > > > >
> > > > > > OCTOBER 13--Hours after Bill O'Reilly accused her of a
> > > > multimillion
> > > > > > dollar shakedown attempt, a female Fox News producer
fired
> > back
> > > > at
> > > > > > the TV star today, filing a lawsuit claiming that he
> > subjected
> > > > her
> > > > > > to repeated instances of sexual harassment and spoke
often,
> > and
> > > > > > explicitly, to her about phone sex, vibrators,
threesomes,
> > > > > > masturbation, the loss of his virginity, and sexual
> > fantasies.
> > > > > Below
> > > > > > you'll find a copy of Andrea Mackris's complaint, an
> > incredible
> > > > > page-
> > > > > > turner that quotes O'Reilly, 55, on all sorts of lewd
> > matters.
> > > > > Based
> > > > > > on the extensive quotations cited in the complaint, it
> > appears
> > > a
> > > > > > safe bet that Mackris, 33, recorded some of O'Reilly's
more
> > > > steamy
> > > > > > soliloquies. For example, we direct you to his

Caribbean

> > shower
> > > > > > fantasies. While we suggest reading the entire

document,

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "John" <three2theroyal@y...> wrote:

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "deadin7" <deadin7@y...> wrote:
> TSG
> > > > will
> > > > > > point you to interesting sections on a Thailand sex
show,
> Al
> > > > > > Franken, and the climax of one August 2004 phone
> > conversation.
> > > > (22
> > > > > > pages)

#17

Nothing new here....next.

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "John" <three2theroyal@y...>

wrote:

>
> OK, I know that I would pay millions to have things dropped if I
was innocent. You better get you eyes checked, you can't see truth.

As how all liberal phonies react to the truth, you've created

another

make-believe scenario that has no more fact associated with it

than

one where it's her having to pay him for slander. You know nothing
and neither do I -- except for the FACT that the issue was

expunged

and deemed a 'non-issue'. Some day you'll wake up and face reality
and truths, but I suspect it'll only be as you seek forgiveness on
your death bed for being so stupid all your life.

Oh, and your buddy Dicky can't attempt to help you out of this one
right now. Guess where he is??

Having more fun than me, I'll bet.

>
> --- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "deadin7" <deadin7@y...>

wrote:

> >
> > --- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "John"

<three2theroyal@y...>

> wrote:
> > >
> > > When the pervert settled to avoid going to court, that's all
the
> > > validation I need. You have a lot of nerve talking about

facts

> sinc
> > > you never, ever present any. Go use your rogaine and let
someone
> > > with an analytical mind post.
> >
> > Here's a flash--and go look the facts up cause that's all you
know
> > how to do. The settlement was solely an agreement to drop
> everything
> > on both sides. No one knows whether she made this up or not,

and

> > whether it's because of money or deposition-requirements, it
> became a
> > non-event at that moment. And if that's "all the validation

you

> > needed" I'd say you've got that liberal disease creeping up on
you
> > once again. Facts, Johnny Boy, Facts.....
> > >
> > > --- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "deadin7" <deadin7@y...>
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > --- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "John"
> <three2theroyal@y...>
> > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > You are boring me, singer. The truth is right in front

of

> your
> > > > > balding head and you won't see it. It must be painful to
> watch
> > > all
> > > > > your heroes be proved liars and thieves. Something new

and

> > > > > interesting, if you can.
> > > >
> > > > HAHA! To ignore the facts must be eating away at you in

order

> to
> > > make
> > > > a stretch out of this. Are you able to say the words
> ALLEGATIONS
> > > > RETRACTED & EXPUNGED? Then figure out what exactly that
means,
> > > even
> > > > if it means pulling out that dictionary you haven't used

in

40
> > > years.
> > > > >
> > > > > --- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "deadin7"

<deadin7@y...>

> > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "John"
> > > <three2theroyal@y...>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > What the sex offender has to say is of little
import
> to
> > > me.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I thought you dealt specifically in facts? You

provide

> the
> > > same
> > > > > > > type of cloud cover over your posts that Dicky does.

I

> take
> > > > > you're
> > > > > > > > accusing O'Reily of being some kind of sex

offender.

> Why
> > > > don't
> > > > > > you go to the Internet and pull up that story, and

show

> the
> > > > > complete
> > > > > > > issue from start to finish. Then we'll see who

besides

> you
> > > > > labels
> > > > > > him as one of those offenders.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I understand you're agony at my truthful replies
about
> > > your
> > > > > sour
> > > > > > > > grapes. Please do keep showing your irritability.

It

> only
> > > > adds
> > > > > to
> > > > > > > my satisfaction that a coward like you is getting

his

> due
> > > BIG
> > > > > > > TIME!!!! HAHAHAHA!!!!
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Old news about a sad pervert but ask and you shall
> receive.
> > > > > Here's
> > > > > > a brief description. The rest can be accessed at:
> > > > > > >
http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/1013043mackris1.html
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I told you to post the facts in their entirety, and I
also
> > > > expeted
> > > > > > you'd fudge it up by trying to be incomplete and
nebulous.
> > You
> > > > > chose
> > > > > > the latter--as if that wasn't expected of a liberal
> without a
> > > > > > paddle. "It appears a safe bet that conversations were
> > > recorded"
> > > > > is
> > > > > > supposed to be reality? You also conveniently left out
the
> > > part
> > > > > where
> > > > > > the entire issue was dropped and all allegations were
> > > expunged.
> > > > > Leave
> > > > > > it to a critic to not recognize all aspects in order

to

> > > continue
> > > > > on
> > > > > > in his make-believe world. And to add to your misery,
> > O'Reilly
> > > is
> > > > > the
> > > > > > most watched newscaster on the tube in history. Guess
your
> > > > > liberals
> > > > > > friends--and the slut who tried and failed to get

money

> from
> > > him--
> > > > > > have one more reason to play follow-the-leader and

take a

> > self-
> > > > > > inflicted bullet in the head at ground zero. God Bless
> > > redemption!
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > O'Reilly Hit With Sex Harass Suit
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Female Fox coworker details lewd behavior of cable

TV

> star
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > OCTOBER 13--Hours after Bill O'Reilly accused her of

a

> > > > > multimillion
> > > > > > > dollar shakedown attempt, a female Fox News producer
> fired
> > > back
> > > > > at
> > > > > > > the TV star today, filing a lawsuit claiming that he
> > > subjected
> > > > > her
> > > > > > > to repeated instances of sexual harassment and spoke
> often,
> > > and
> > > > > > > explicitly, to her about phone sex, vibrators,
> threesomes,
> > > > > > > masturbation, the loss of his virginity, and sexual
> > > fantasies.
> > > > > > Below
> > > > > > > you'll find a copy of Andrea Mackris's complaint, an
> > > incredible
> > > > > > page-
> > > > > > > turner that quotes O'Reilly, 55, on all sorts of

lewd

> > > matters.
> > > > > > Based
> > > > > > > on the extensive quotations cited in the complaint,

it

> > > appears
> > > > a
> > > > > > > safe bet that Mackris, 33, recorded some of

O'Reilly's

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "deadin7" <deadin7@y...> wrote:

> more
> > > > > steamy
> > > > > > > soliloquies. For example, we direct you to his
Caribbean
> > > shower
> > > > > > > fantasies. While we suggest reading the entire
document,
> > TSG
> > > > > will
> > > > > > > point you to interesting sections on a Thailand sex
> show,
> > Al
> > > > > > > Franken, and the climax of one August 2004 phone
> > > conversation.
> > > > > (22
> > > > > > > pages)

#18

I'll make it easy for the Robese one. I was bowling.

Of course, John doesn't need my help. He's outclassed you several
times over by using facts, yes, those things you avoid like the
plague.

In addition, I suspect John isn't the least little bit surprised that
your wife brings home the bacon and rules the Singer household.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "deadin7" <deadin7@y...> wrote:

Oh, and your buddy Dicky can't attempt to help you out of this one
right now. Guess where he is??

#19

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...>
wrote:

> Oh, and your buddy Dicky can't attempt to help you out of this

one

> right now. Guess where he is??

I'll make it easy for the Robese one. I was bowling.

Of course, John doesn't need my help. He's outclassed you several
times over by using facts, yes, those things you avoid like the
plague.

In addition, I suspect John isn't the least little bit surprised

that

your wife brings home the bacon and rules the Singer household.

Actually, that warms my heart.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "deadin7" <deadin7@y...> wrote:

#20

> Oh, and your buddy Dicky can't attempt to help you out of this

one

> right now. Guess where he is??

I'll make it easy for the Robese one. I was bowling.

So I don't laugh TOO hard, who won the bet??

Of course, John doesn't need my help. He's outclassed you several
times over by using facts, yes, those things you avoid like the
plague.

In addition, I suspect John isn't the least little bit surprised

that

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...> wrote:

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "deadin7" <deadin7@y...> wrote:
your wife brings home the bacon and rules the Singer household.