INDIAN CASINOS

[Howard_Stern]

Not talking about VP but BJ. Since two deck games are being dealt from automatic but not continuous shufflers the game is very likely honest. (Also won at all three casinos at that game last month.) Two deck games had the disadvantage of dealer hitting soft 17 but could double on any two cards and also after splitting. One of the casinos allowed respliting except aces. Penetration was only a little better than one deck in these games.

···

----- Original Message -----
From: MHS
To: vpFREE@yahoogroups.com
Sent: 9/13/2003 4:27:28 PM
Subject: RE: [vpFREE] INDIAN CASINOS

Howard Stern wrote:
"At least in Wisconsin these games are roughly as good as LV."

That statement has to entirely unverifiable unless certified audits are
produced.

Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT

vpFREE Links: http://www.west-point.org/users/usma1955/20228/VP/Links.htm

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[MHS1]

Howard Stern wrote: "Not talking about VP but BJ. Since two deck games are
being dealt from automatic but not continuous shufflers the game is very
likely honest."

Maybe. But it is notable that Mohegan Sun, either the largest or second
largest casino in the world, cannot answer a simple question as to what is
the mandatory side bet at $5 and $10 tables called Bonanza Blackjack.
Neither can the blackjack newsgroup nor other so-called experts, and the
apparent originator of the game has no information on it. Talk about
pathetic.