actually, with disclosed dual agency a broker (and therefore his/her agent)
cannot represent both sides of a transaction unless the seller has agreed to
this possibility up front, and even then he/she cannot negotiate for both
sides, but must remain neutral.
In a message dated 11/4/2005 3:31:20 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,
a-p@sympatico.ca writes:
How about a real estate broker.
···
----- Original Message -----
From: worldbefree22001
To: vpFREE@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, November 04, 2005 2:41 PM
Subject: [vpFREE] Re: I attended a Bob Dancer/ Fleas
Anyone have a good analogy for playing both sides of the
fence here? Lawyer, doctor, consulting engineer, priest,
none of these seems to have the same dynamic as this
situation. I can't think of another situation where someone
simotaneously; advises the house, actively and agressively
tries to exploit the house and competing players, sells other
services to the house and sells products to other players
(fleas). Somehow the relationship seems wrong, but I'm not
judging just looking for a good comparison.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~-->
Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page
_Click Here!_ (http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/E0TolB/TM)
--------------------------------------------------------------------~->
vpFREE Links: http://members.cox.net/vpfree/Links.htm
Yahoo! Groups Links
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]