jw776655 wrote:
His posts here have tried to make the point that he is
simultaneously helping the casino and players. Based on his
presentation, nothing could be farther from the truth. <<<
jw776655 also wrote:
The context was : Dancer explained a $1 full pay vp machine may
yield, for example, $30/hour to the minority of disciplined players
who can play perfect strategy.
This is not desirable. However, the same machine can be allowed to
remain at the 25 cent level. It may yield $7.50/hour profit to those
players with discipline and the ability to play perfect strategy.
However, these are [laughing] "fleas".
I don't see anything in your report that contradicts "His posts here
have tried to make the point that he is simultaneously helping the
casino and players" nor do I see anything that adequately supports
"Based on his presentation, nothing could be farther from the truth".
Also I don't see anything particularly offensive or inaccurate in
referring to 25c advantage players as fleas.
FWIW, I don't begrudge anyone using their knowledge and experience
as a casino video poker consultant, even if it works to my disadvantage
- which isn't a given. In theory, I prefer having a guru who is a
player and a marketer of video poker products for players, as a casino
consultant over someone who isn't a player or a marketer. The both
sides of the fence worker/player has a much greater vested interest in
preserving and promoting advantage plays than someone with fewer
irons in the fire.
I'm hopeful (but not holding my breath) that enlightened video poker
consultants may advise casinos to install and aggressively market
positive games and thereby fill some of those empty video poker seats.
They could use us fleas as loss leaders (winning players to be
emulated) to greatly expand the video poker universe, and be happy
with us fleas having a small piece of a much bigger pie.
vpFae