Greetings from Las Vegas, Home of Positive ER Video Poker:
Positive comments on HOF nominees are appropriate, welcomed and
encouraged during the election.
Negative comments on HOF nominees are discouraged during the election.
Demeaning comments on anyone at anytime aren't tolerated on vpFREE.
vpFREE Administrator
How would the administrator suggest that members discuss the candidates
if they can't disagree on this to some degree?
Scot
-----Original Message-----
From: vp_FREE [mailto:vpF…@…net]
Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2003 7:20 PM
To: vpFREE
Subject: [vpFREE] HOF Electioneering
Greetings from Las Vegas, Home of Positive ER Video Poker:
Positive comments on HOF nominees are appropriate, welcomed and
encouraged during the election.
Negative comments on HOF nominees are discouraged during the election.
Demeaning comments on anyone at anytime aren't tolerated on vpFREE.
vpFREE Administrator
vpFREE Links: http://tinyurl.com/a7ga
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Factual, non-demeaning (whatever that means) negative comments are
discouraged, not prohibited. But, IMO the whole HOF process is best
served by emphasizing the worthiness of one's favorites.
FREEvpFREE, the free speech adjunct of vpFREE, is an appropriate
place to post any negative comments on HOF nominees.
http://www.smartgroups.com/groups/freevpfree
<a href="http://www.smartgroups.com/groups/freevpfree">
http://www.smartgroups.com/groups/freevpfree</a>
If there are any such posts (haven't been any posts on FREEvpFREE
for over three months), I'll advise vpFREE.
vpFREE Administrator
On 23 Jul 2003 at 19:36, Scot Krause wrote:
How would the administrator suggest that members discuss the
candidates if they can't disagree on this to some degree?
Just a little difficult to separate I guess. Sometimes, unfortunately,
facts ("Factual") ARE demeaning and negative. We aren't discussing a
strategy, but we are discussing "people." Just as opinions are
presented about any candidate from sports to politics, there will plenty
of commentary, and not always positive. Just my opinion.
Scot
-----Original Message-----
From: vp_FREE [mailto:vpF…@…net]
Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2003 8:07 PM
To: vpFREE
Subject: [vpFREE] RE: HOF Electioneering
On 23 Jul 2003 at 19:36, Scot Krause wrote:
How would the administrator suggest that members discuss the
candidates if they can't disagree on this to some degree?
Factual, non-demeaning (whatever that means) negative comments are
discouraged, not prohibited. But, IMO the whole HOF process is best
served by emphasizing the worthiness of one's favorites.
FREEvpFREE, the free speech adjunct of vpFREE, is an appropriate
place to post any negative comments on HOF nominees.
http://www.smartgroups.com/groups/freevpfree
<a href="http://www.smartgroups.com/groups/freevpfree">
http://www.smartgroups.com/groups/freevpfree</a>
If there are any such posts (haven't been any posts on FREEvpFREE
for over three months), I'll advise vpFREE.
vpFREE Administrator
vpFREE Links: http://tinyurl.com/a7ga
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
I applaud you Tom! I think we would all be much better off if our
politicians adopted a similar guideline. Imagine what an election
would be like if the candidates has to actually present ideas instead
of just bashing their opposition at every chance. I'm a dreamer,
right?
Sal
--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "vp_FREE" <vpFREE@C...> wrote:
Factual, non-demeaning (whatever that means) negative comments are
discouraged, not prohibited. But, IMO the whole HOF process is best
served by emphasizing the worthiness of one's favorites.