vpFREE2 Forums

History Proves The Mouths and Geeks Are Afraid of Singer.

AS consistent as the sun rising in the desert, there's always someone
out there SAYING they want to challenge me to a bet about my ability
to win with my Play Strategy. The problem is, it's exclusively been
the "talk the talk" and never the "walk the walk" syndrome. Examples:

-----In 2001 Bob Dancer was the first to make a big mistake with me.
Convinced I did not win as I said I did, he offered a bet of $20,000
that he would win more than me in the following 12 months. Although
proof on either side was difficult for a 12-month period, we worked
out a set of reasonable parameters that were agreed to so an accurate
final decision could be made. He was serious in that he wanted me to
come to LV with the cash for both of us to deposit. Because he was
belittling me in subsequent articles about how I could easily lose a
$57,200 bankroll in a single session, I was out to prove him wrong.
So I upped the stakes to $57,200--hardly unreachable for someone who
constantly gave the perception that he was made of gambling money.
There was an agreement, and I was to meet him at midnight at the
cashier's cage at the Aladdin with our cash. I waited 2 hours, and
when I returned home he had a concessionary e-mail awaiting me. Smart
move.

-----In 2005 loud-mouthed 'You Can Bet On It' LV radio personality
Fezzik, a sportsbettor with a jealous streak--ran his mouth on his
show how I was a liar & a fraud when I said I had won over $640,000
in the previous 8 years of playing my strategy in Nevada. HUGE
mistake. Little did he realize that I was the wrong person to take
on. In response to his baseless attack, I publicly offered a $640,000
bet that I could prove I had won exactly what and how I said I did
(essentially the same bet dicky here weaseled out of with his baloney
about proving other things didn't happen--totally nonsensical) and I
posted the challenge in Gaming Today. I told of my posting my escrow
at a local casino--which I already did by the time he read it--and
how he needed to do the same. After a round of embarrassing face-
saving excuses (something Dick is VERY familiar with) he declined. My
follow-up article kept the humiliation of this radio clown to a
bearable minimum. Fezzik then, in some sort of attempt to save face,
agreed with me to bet me on a session that he said I would not win. I
accepted, and then he decided to include 3 stipulations which I also
accepted. But when I added in one simple stipulation of my own
afterwards--that upon my winning, he announce on his radio show that
my play strategy is all I said it was, and he would have to take
defeat like a man. Naturally, he declined, and in the process let out
one gigantic sigh of relief for not having to go up against me. When
I look back this was my mistake though. I should have left it alone
because it was ME who gave this bazooka a way out. I was not kind to
him in an ensuing GT article, one that the staff at GT said was the
most revealing of its kind against those who claim I'm a liar.

-----There have been various challenges/bets over the years, and each
and every time the other party ends up wiggling out with a bow to the
Singer superiority. It isn't that I'm trying to make fools of these
people--they just can't combat simple common sense. I do what I say I
do, I post extremely accurate gaming results as they occur, and
others become infuriated by my success - let alone by the fact that I
diss, with solid reasoning, their long-term strategy crap. Dick &
Congo recently got a taste of their own envy of me. Bets with moving
targets (Dick's favorite), bets with 7:1 odds in their favor, and
bets purposely made with unclear parameters just in case I clarified
them into being fair so that they could squeeze out of following thru
on them. These people aren't stupid. they know what they're doing
when setting up bets with escape clauses, and the bets really aren't
up to the Bob Dancer level of authenticity anyway. These clowns do
not have the money or the gonads to bet me, and they prove it over
and over again. If Congo did, for instance, he wouldn't still be
harping on a fictitional $2million dollar bet, and rather, would step
up to the plate like a man not in need of HA! 7:1 odds to bet with
me, instead of a squealy little mouse ready to run and hide if I came
out and accepted.

These are 'advantage players'? HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!! ADVANTAGE
SINGER!!

<<bets with 7:1 odds in their favor>>

If you're only willing to lay even money that you'll win a single session,
that's proof enough that you are a charlatan, who doesn't even believe in
his own snake oil, rather than a quack, who does.

Tell you what. Here's bet for you: $250,000 that you'll lose money over the
next 50 sessions of your system, played exclusively on games with optimal
payback less than 99.2%.

<<If Congo did, for instance, he wouldn't still be harping on a fictitional
$2million dollar bet>>

I mean, how can you lie about something that is trivial to verify?

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FREEvpFREE/message/2165
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FREEvpFREE/message/2175
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FREEvpFREE/message/2177
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FREEvpFREE/message/2180
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FREEvpFREE/message/2183
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FREEvpFREE/message/2215
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FREEvpFREE/message/2217

Cogno

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "Cogno Scienti"
<cognoscienti@g...> wrote:

<<bets with 7:1 odds in their favor>>

If you're only willing to lay even money that you'll win a single

session,

that's proof enough that you are a charlatan, who doesn't even

believe in

his own snake oil, rather than a quack, who does.

Who cares about that? You call me a liar, I accept your offer to bet
that I'm not in a one-session sitting, and then you change it around
and around along with wanting ODDS. HA! What a coward! It's a bit
different mouthing off all the time that I'm a liar, then when it
comes time to back it up you reach for the escape clauses.......

Tell you what. Here's bet for you: $250,000 that you'll lose money

over the next 50 sessions of your system, played exclusively on games
with optimal payback less than 99.2%.

Let me guess what your escape clause is here....OK, I got it. Since
you know I'll win regardless of the pay tables, duh, you know the
logistics of verifying I do what you want is impossible. So that's
how you'll sneak away this time. Last time it was odds, then it was
wanting me to play with less of a bankroll than I always do, and now
this. Go ahead. Spank yourself with that slide rule you guys carry
around right next to that stupid laptop you depend on to see how much
gas you saved driving that piece of crap around from casino to casino.

<<If Congo did, for instance, he wouldn't still be harping on a

fictitional

$2million dollar bet>>

I mean, how can you lie about something that is trivial to verify?

You still don't get it. As a puppet of mine I can get you to do
virtually ANYTHING I want, and this time I wanted you to waste time
and make a bigger fool of yourself. And guess what?

···

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FREEvpFREE/message/2165
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FREEvpFREE/message/2175
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FREEvpFREE/message/2177
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FREEvpFREE/message/2180
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FREEvpFREE/message/2183
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FREEvpFREE/message/2215
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FREEvpFREE/message/2217

Cogno

<<I accept your offer to bet that I'm not in a one-session sitting, and then
you change it around and around along with wanting ODDS.>>

I've now offered you four different bets, all of which you've chickened out
of.

Tell you what. Here's bet for you: $250,000 that you'll lose money

over the next 50 sessions of your system, played exclusively on games with
optimal payback less than 99.2%.

<<you know the logistics of verifying I do what you want is impossible>>

Not at all. We just have to set up a time and place and get a referee. Any
sessions you play that are not observed by the referee don't count, but the
bet continues. Do you accept?

<<You still don't get it. As a puppet of mine I can get you to do virtually
ANYTHING I want, and this time I wanted you to waste time and make a bigger
fool of yourself. And guess what?>>

You...er...got your puppet to prove you're a fraud, liar, and welsher once
again? Good job puppet master!

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FREEvpFREE/message/2165
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FREEvpFREE/message/2175
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FREEvpFREE/message/2177
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FREEvpFREE/message/2180
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FREEvpFREE/message/2183
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FREEvpFREE/message/2215
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FREEvpFREE/message/2217

Cogno

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "Cogno Scienti"
<cognoscienti@g...> wrote:

<<I accept your offer to bet that I'm not in a one-session sitting,

and then

you change it around and around along with wanting ODDS.>>

I've now offered you four different bets, all of which you've

chickened out of.

Sure, according to the Congo definition of 'bets' and chickening
out'. Did you ever think about offering a bet that made sense? Get
back with me when you have something valid to offer, WITHOUT adding
in after-the-fact stipulations or ridiculous odds for the sole
purpose of making it easier for you to win. You certainly have been
sissified by littly dicky!

Not at all. We just have to set up a time and place and get a

referee. Anysessions you play that are not observed by the referee
don't count, but the bet continues. Do you accept?

A referee? 50 times in 50 places? Guess why you can't do that,
Einstein. I don't even know what time of day or night I'll be in LV,
Laughlin, Tahoe or Reno or even when until the day before I leave--
and this 'referee' is supposed to be on call 24 hours a day all over
the state for over a year? HA! That's not even a nice try. And
besides, unlike you where you play to feed an addiction, I play for a
living. That means No Bozos. Now let's see if all that self-
proclaimed intellect can come up with something real, and leave the
theories and sissification at home.

<<You still don't get it. As a puppet of mine I can get you to do

virtually

ANYTHING I want, and this time I wanted you to waste time and make

a bigger

fool of yourself. And guess what?>>

You...er...got your puppet to prove you're a fraud, liar, and

welsher once again? Good job puppet master!

I kinda like where I said you made a bigger fool of yourself, and at
my beckoning. That seems to fit you much better, and it fits me in
that I'm usually telling you morons what to do, how to do it and
when.

···

>
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FREEvpFREE/message/2165
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FREEvpFREE/message/2175
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FREEvpFREE/message/2177
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FREEvpFREE/message/2180
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FREEvpFREE/message/2183
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FREEvpFREE/message/2215
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FREEvpFREE/message/2217

Cogno

<<A referee? 50 times in 50 places? Guess why you can't do that,
Einstein. I don't even know what time of day or night I'll be in LV,
Laughlin, Tahoe or Reno or even when until the day before I leave--
and this 'referee' is supposed to be on call 24 hours a day all over
the state for over a year? HA! That's not even a nice try. And
besides, unlike you where you play to feed an addiction, I play for a
living. That means No Bozos.>>

That's why I said you could play all the unobserved sessions you want and
they wouldn't count for the bet. Just let us know when and where and, if the
referee can be there, the session will count for the bet. If not, we'll just
go to the next one. Eventually we'll get 50. If you chicken out and stop
playing you lose the bet. So now we're down to your last-ditch objection,
that your system doesn't work if anyone is watching. So how about it? Are
you willing to put your money where your mouth is?

Cogno

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "Cogno Scienti"
<cognoscienti@g...> wrote:

<<A referee? 50 times in 50 places? Guess why you can't do that,
Einstein. I don't even know what time of day or night I'll be in

LV, Laughlin, Tahoe or Reno or even when until the day before I leave-
-and this 'referee' is supposed to be on call 24 hours a day all over

the state for over a year? HA! That's not even a nice try. And
besides, unlike you where you play to feed an addiction, I play for

a living. That means No Bozos.>>

That's why I said you could play all the unobserved sessions you

want andthey wouldn't count for the bet. Just let us know when and
where and, if thereferee can be there, the session will count for the
bet. If not, we'll just go to the next one. Eventually we'll get 50.

OK, let's give it a try. I'll be in Laughlin at the Colorado Belle
tomorrow (Thurs.) overnight - as I typically travel overnight -
somewhere around 2-3am IF I don't stop to sleep somewhere along the
way. If I do then I have no idea when I'll get there. And even if I
don't, if I'm tired when I arrive I'll take a nap first, then play if
I'm not hungry. And I may even feel like playing next door first at
the Edgewater, or across the street at the Ramada--all depends on how
I feel whenever it is that I'm ready to play. Many times I start off
in Laughlin then go somewhere in LV or even up to Reno. Depends how I
feel. If you read my strategy, SCHEDULE is not a part of it, and I
never fly on such trips. Make sure you're verifier has a car that'll
be able to travel at a moment's notice. So who you got to handle
this....and the trips are all similar, regardless of which end of the
state I decide to start in. Name & number and I'll give him or her a
call right now to get started. $250k over 50 trips. No skipping
trips, and I have one year to complete them. If the verifier doesn't
show then too bad--you take my word for it. So if I were you I'd be
prepared to be that verifier at such sessions. Winner take all if I'm
$1 ahead by the end. I suggest you also be there tomorrow
night/morning with someone mutually agreeable and with a
recognizeable name that'll take the cash from both of us--which I can
get tomorrow during the day. I'll forego the objection of having
someone watching me play because I know that person will be far more
uncomfortable than I am. If you accept you will send me your tel.
number by private e-mail, and I will write an article for GT as soon
as you accept putting it up in public so there will be no
misunderstanding. It will be written up exactly as we have here. I
will also get Channel 3 LV to cover the bet story if you agree. If it
goes the same as the Fezzik bet, we'll both need to be there for
filming at the beginning, when we sign papers--which will be
tomorrow. I say let's do it! Game EV doesn't matter to me.

<<OK, let's give it a try.>>

Wonderful.

Let's get the cash and the referee taken care of before we start talking
about 2 a.m. anything.

<<Make sure you're verifier has a car that'll be able to travel at a
moment's notice.>>

If it's too last-minute, we'll just skip it and go on to the next session.

<<$250k over 50 trips.>>

The bet is $250k that you will lose money playing exclusively games with an
optimal return of 99.2% at most over 50 sessions of your system, where you
must win $2500 or lose $57,200.

<<No skipping trips, and I have one year to complete them. If the verifier
doesn't show then too bad--you take my word for it.>>

Nope. That wasn't the bet. I explicitly said 50 verified sessions, and if
one isn't verified we go on to the next one.

<< So if I were you I'd be prepared to be that verifier at such sessions.>>

We will have a mutually acceptable referee whose decision will be final.

<< Winner take all if I'm
$1 ahead by the end.>>

Yes.

<< I suggest you also be there tomorrow night/morning with someone mutually
agreeable and with a recognizeable name that'll take the cash from both of
us--which I can get tomorrow during the day. I'll forego the objection of
having someone watching me play because I know that person will be far more
uncomfortable than I am. If you accept you will send me your tel.
number by private e-mail, and I will write an article for GT as soon as you
accept putting it up in public so there will be no misunderstanding. It will
be written up exactly as we have here. I will also get Channel 3 LV to cover
the bet story if you agree. If it goes the same as the Fezzik bet, we'll
both need to be there for filming at the beginning, when we sign
papers--which will be tomorrow. I say let's do it! Game EV doesn't matter to
me. >>

There will be no unverified sessions in the bet. Do you agree to that?

Cogno

------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> Get
fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page
http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/E0TolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~->

vpFREE Links: http://members.cox.net/vpfree/Links.htm

Yahoo! Groups Links

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "Cogno Scienti"
<cognoscienti@g...> wrote:

<<OK, let's give it a try.>>

Wonderful.

Let's get the cash and the referee taken care of before we start

talking about 2 a.m. anything.

I already said I'm taking care of that tomorrow in time for the
session and the signing. There's no reason to hold this up, and i
want my first session to be this trip.

<<Make sure you're verifier has a car that'll be able to travel at a
moment's notice.>>

If it's too last-minute, we'll just skip it and go on to the next

session.

<<$250k over 50 trips.>>

The bet is $250k that you will lose money playing exclusively games

with an optimal return of 99.2% at most over 50 sessions of your
system, where you must win $2500 or lose $57,200.

I play BP and then 10/7 DB, SDB, TBP+, DDB, or Super Aces in that
order, and I don't care who has what. I just sit down where I'm
comfortable, and whatever game is there is the one I play. You don't
have to worry about the higher limits because few places carry

99.2%, and I'm not gonna fuss over noise-level percentages. Next, I

never lose $57,200 in a session because of the cashouts along the
way. My strategy says that when I'm done I'm done, and I go home win
or lose--however much over the $2500 I am or however much the loss
amount is. It could be $57,200 but it hasn't happened in 250
sessions.

<<No skipping trips, and I have one year to complete them. If the

verifier doesn't show then too bad--you take my word for it.>>

Nope. That wasn't the bet. I explicitly said 50 verified sessions,

and if one isn't verified we go on to the next one.

That's peanuts and you know it. Don't tell me you're reaching for
your book of escape clauses again. If we're going to do this and I'm
the one playing and travelling, then you'll find a verifier that can
keep up with me for 50 straight sessions/trips. Pick a young guy,
because that's the only type that could handle it.

<< I suggest you also be there tomorrow night/morning with someone

mutually

agreeable and with a recognizeable name that'll take the cash from

both of

us--which I can get tomorrow during the day. I'll forego the

objection of

having someone watching me play because I know that person will be

far more

uncomfortable than I am. If you accept you will send me your tel.
number by private e-mail, and I will write an article for GT as

soon as you

accept putting it up in public so there will be no

misunderstanding. It will

be written up exactly as we have here. I will also get Channel 3 LV

to cover

the bet story if you agree. If it goes the same as the Fezzik bet,

we'll

both need to be there for filming at the beginning, when we sign
papers--which will be tomorrow. I say let's do it! Game EV doesn't

matter to

me. >>

There will be no unverified sessions in the bet. Do you agree to

that?

Read above, and if you don't agree with it and come up with a
reasonable explanation that does service to this bet, I'll give it
serious thought. Do you agree with the TV station being there? With
GT, either way I've already begun an article. I'm just awaiting your
number, etc. because I already know who you are. Do I have permission
to print your name in my column?

<<I already said I'm taking care of that tomorrow in time for the
session and the signing. There's no reason to hold this up, and i
want my first session to be this trip.>>

In the first place, I'm not going to Laughlin at all or to anywhere at 2
a.m. You'll need to have the $250k on deposit with someone I trust, along
with a signed agreement, before I believe you're serious about the bet. You
already welshed on a $2 million bet with me so obviously you cannot be
trusted. Beyond that, you've already started your game of modifying my offer
and then claiming it's I who am weaseling out. I have very little confidence
that you will ever accept this bet.

<<I play BP and then 10/7 DB, SDB, TBP+, DDB, or Super Aces in that
order, and I don't care who has what. I just sit down where I'm
comfortable, and whatever game is there is the one I play. You don't
have to worry about the higher limits because few places carry

99.2%, and I'm not gonna fuss over noise-level percentages. Next, I

never lose $57,200 in a session because of the cashouts along the
way. My strategy says that when I'm done I'm done, and I go home win
or lose--however much over the $2500 I am or however much the loss
amount is. It could be $57,200 but it hasn't happened in 250
sessions. >>

The bet was all negative games with optimal paybacks under 99.2%.

I'm OK with keeping the cashouts as long as you follow the strategy of going
to higher denomination machines when you lose and stopping when you lose 400
credits at $25 or $100, as your strategy dictates.

<<If we're going to do this and I'm
the one playing and travelling, then you'll find a verifier that can
keep up with me for 50 straight sessions/trips.>>

That was not the bet, and I'm not willing to accept that change.

There will be no unverified sessions in the bet. Do you agree to

that?

<<Read above, and if you don't agree with it and come up with a
reasonable explanation that does service to this bet, I'll give it
serious thought.>>

Since the bet is largely about calling you out as a liar and fraud, taking
your word for your results simply wouldn't work. If you were on the
up-and-up, we could actually have a schedule. Your midnight-express story is
just an excuse to keep from being easily verified.

<< Do you agree with the TV station being there? With
GT, either way I've already begun an article. I'm just awaiting your
number, etc. because I already know who you are. Do I have permission
to print your name in my column? >>

No.

Cogno

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "Cogno Scienti"
<cognoscienti@g...> wrote:

<I already said I'm taking care of that tomorrow in time for the
session and the signing. There's no reason to hold this up, and I
want my first session to be this trip.>>

In the first place, I'm not going to Laughlin at all or to anywhere

at 2a.m. You'll need to have the $250k on deposit with someone I
trust, along with a signed agreement, before I believe you're serious
about the bet. You already welshed on a $2 million bet with me so
obviously you cannot be trusted. Beyond that, you've already started
your game of modifying my offer and then claiming it's I who am
weaseling out. I have very little confidence that you will ever
accept this bet.

Ahhhh....The cowardly side of you already is popping out. So
you're "not going to Laughlin or anywhere else at 2am"? Funny, you
know that's my playing time for nearly every session, and now that
I'm accepting your bet to test MY play strategy, you're suddenly
discomforted by it all. Tough love. You've got until noon today to
confirm that you or your agent will be at the Belle at 2am'ish, with
the cash, or my article will call you out for what you are--a yellow-
bellied coward with the fear of Rob Singer within. I've got a GT
photographer scheduled and I'm playing my session that will count
towards the 50. There has been no modification of your offer--you
said I am to play MY play strategy and I will not modify any aspect
of it one bit. If you insert modifications to MY strategy then they
will not be accepted because we are betting on MY strategy and MY
strategy only. If you're truly worried about trusting me, just show
up. What'cha got to lose? You can belittle me all you like if
I 'welsh'. When I make a public bet and write a column in GT about
it, they'd have no part of it or me if it weren't as real as the
Fezzik bet.

<<I play BP and then 10/7 DB, SDB, TBP+, DDB, or Super Aces in that
order, and I don't care who has what. I just sit down where I'm
comfortable, and whatever game is there is the one I play. You

don't

have to worry about the higher limits because few places carry
>99.2%, and I'm not gonna fuss over noise-level percentages. Next,

I

never lose $57,200 in a session because of the cashouts along the
way. My strategy says that when I'm done I'm done, and I go home

win

or lose--however much over the $2500 I am or however much the loss
amount is. It could be $57,200 but it hasn't happened in 250
sessions. >>

The bet was all negative games with optimal paybacks under 99.2%.

I'm OK with keeping the cashouts as long as you follow the strategy

of going to higher denomination machines when you lose and stopping
when you lose 400 credits at $25 or $100, as your strategy dictates.

That's a bit comical, don't you think? As stated above, I'm playing
my strategy to the letter without change. That's the bet, plain &
simple. So you're wasting your time trying to dictate changes that
make no sense to this bet.

<<If we're going to do this and I'm
the one playing and travelling, then you'll find a verifier that

can keep up with me for 50 straight sessions/trips.>>

That was not the bet, and I'm not willing to accept that change.

> There will be no unverified sessions in the bet. Do you agree to
that?

<<Read above, and if you don't agree with it and come up with a
reasonable explanation that does service to this bet, I'll give it
serious thought.>>

Since the bet is largely about calling you out as a liar and fraud,

takingyour word for your results simply wouldn't work. If you were on
theup-and-up, we could actually have a schedule. Your midnight-
express story is just an excuse to keep from being easily verified.

I'm ready to accept the challenge, I'm ready to publicize the bet for
validation purposes, I'm ready with the cash tomorrow night, I'm
ready to play my first of 50 sessions while being watched (which is
against my better judgement) and I'm ready with my verifier. This
isn't some stupid war of words for "millions" while I'm pulling your
leg on an Internet forum. THIS IS REAL, AND FOR YOU AS REAL AS IT
GETS. You're all mouth BEFORE I call you on your bet, and now you
look like a scared little boy running away sucking on his thumb. I
see below you don't want your name printed or the TV cameras present.
Too late. Either back up your words with actions or YOU WILL be
called out in the paper. Maybe you'll be able to spend some of that
cash you say you have suing me, and we'll see who's got the most
money then because that's the person who always prevails--esp. in
gambling-related cases. Get with me by NOON Thursday and we can stop
with the foolishness and get on with the bet. After that, I will not
have time to get the $250k in cash, and I won't waste my time any
more. And what's this about being squirmish about my middle-of-the-
night play? that's when I always start play and you know it. That's
when I drive from here to Nv. and you know that too. Time of day
should be of NO ISSUE when there's all that money at stake. To show
worry over that trivial point is akin to running scared. You have
your chance--make the right decision. Remember, it's also your chance
to break away from being sissified by dicky.

<< Do you agree with the TV station being there? With
GT, either way I've already begun an article. I'm just awaiting

your

number, etc. because I already know who you are. Do I have

permission

···

to print your name in my column? >>

No.

Cogno

<<You've got until noon today to confirm that you or your agent will be at
the Belle at 2am'ish, with the cash>>

Uh...no. My bet said nothing about going anywhere at 2 a.m. to sign an
agreement. Before anything is signed, you must agree to the original bet:
<99.2% machines only and only verified sessions count. Once we select a
mutually acceptable referee, I will have an attorney draw up an iron-clad
agreement, which we will give to an escrow company along with the $250,000
each. If you are unreasonable about giving advance notice, that can only be
interpreted as weaseling out of the bet. I will find someone who is willing
to go to Laughlin in the middle of the night, but with at least a day's
notice. Only verified sessions count, so you can't get out of the bet or
cheat by making it difficult for the verifier to find you.

<<my article>>

I suggest you consult an attorney about libel laws before publication.

<<There has been no modification of your offer--you said I am to play MY
play strategy and I will not modify any aspect of it one bit. If you insert
modifications to MY strategy then they will not be accepted because we are
betting on MY strategy and MY strategy only.>>

You just posted two modifications to my bet and now you lie and say there
was no modification. Shall I assume that means you are declining the bet?

<< If you're truly worried about trusting me, just show up. What'cha got to
lose? You can belittle me all you like if I 'welsh'. When I make a public
bet and write a column in GT about it, they'd have no part of it or me if it
weren't as real as the Fezzik bet. >>

You've already welshed and I've already belittled you. I have no interest in
going to Laughlin ever or anywhere at 2 a.m. Clearly you're awake during the
day since you spend so much of it making a fool of yourself on this forum.
I'm not worried about trusting you; I have no trust in you whatsoever.

<<I'm playing my strategy to the letter without change. That's the bet,
plain & simple.>>

No. The bet has always been games under 99.2%.

<<I'm ready to accept the challenge, I'm ready to publicize the bet for
validation purposes, I'm ready with the cash tomorrow night, I'm ready to
play my first of 50 sessions while being watched (which is against my better
judgement) and I'm ready with my verifier.>>

You haven't even agreed to the bet yet, so I don't see how you can say
you're ready for anything.

<< This isn't some stupid war of words for "millions" while I'm pulling your
leg on an Internet forum.>>

You're referring to the $2 million bet that you welshed on?

<<Maybe you'll be able to spend some of that cash you say you have suing me,
and we'll see who's got the most money>>

What would I sue you for? Backing out of a bet? I knew you were going to do
that before I started.

<<Time of day should be of NO ISSUE when there's all that money at stake.>>

Great. We'll do all the sessions in Las Vegas at 10 a.m. then.

<< To show worry over that trivial point is akin to running scared.>>

Glad you agree.

Cogno

No more nonsense. You have until noon today to confirm, and I will
not change one thing about the play strategy that you seem so sure
does not and cannot win. That's your bet. Confirm it or be humiliated
in GT.

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "Cogno Scienti"
<cognoscienti@g...> wrote:

<<You've got until noon today to confirm that you or your agent

will be at

the Belle at 2am'ish, with the cash>>

Uh...no. My bet said nothing about going anywhere at 2 a.m. to sign

an

agreement. Before anything is signed, you must agree to the

original bet:

<99.2% machines only and only verified sessions count. Once we

select a

mutually acceptable referee, I will have an attorney draw up an

iron-clad

agreement, which we will give to an escrow company along with the

$250,000

each. If you are unreasonable about giving advance notice, that can

only be

interpreted as weaseling out of the bet. I will find someone who is

willing

to go to Laughlin in the middle of the night, but with at least a

day's

notice. Only verified sessions count, so you can't get out of the

bet or

cheat by making it difficult for the verifier to find you.

<<my article>>

I suggest you consult an attorney about libel laws before

publication.

<<There has been no modification of your offer--you said I am to

play MY

play strategy and I will not modify any aspect of it one bit. If

you insert

modifications to MY strategy then they will not be accepted because

we are

betting on MY strategy and MY strategy only.>>

You just posted two modifications to my bet and now you lie and say

there

was no modification. Shall I assume that means you are declining

the bet?

<< If you're truly worried about trusting me, just show up.

What'cha got to

lose? You can belittle me all you like if I 'welsh'. When I make a

public

bet and write a column in GT about it, they'd have no part of it or

me if it

weren't as real as the Fezzik bet. >>

You've already welshed and I've already belittled you. I have no

interest in

going to Laughlin ever or anywhere at 2 a.m. Clearly you're awake

during the

day since you spend so much of it making a fool of yourself on this

forum.

I'm not worried about trusting you; I have no trust in you

whatsoever.

<<I'm playing my strategy to the letter without change. That's the

bet,

plain & simple.>>

No. The bet has always been games under 99.2%.

<<I'm ready to accept the challenge, I'm ready to publicize the bet

for

validation purposes, I'm ready with the cash tomorrow night, I'm

ready to

play my first of 50 sessions while being watched (which is against

my better

judgement) and I'm ready with my verifier.>>

You haven't even agreed to the bet yet, so I don't see how you can

say

you're ready for anything.

<< This isn't some stupid war of words for "millions" while I'm

pulling your

leg on an Internet forum.>>

You're referring to the $2 million bet that you welshed on?

<<Maybe you'll be able to spend some of that cash you say you have

suing me,

and we'll see who's got the most money>>

What would I sue you for? Backing out of a bet? I knew you were

going to do

that before I started.

<<Time of day should be of NO ISSUE when there's all that money at

stake.>>

Great. We'll do all the sessions in Las Vegas at 10 a.m. then.

<< To show worry over that trivial point is akin to running

scared.>>

···

Glad you agree.

Cogno

<<No more nonsense. You have until noon today to confirm, and I will not
change one thing about the play strategy that you seem so sure does not and
cannot win. That's your bet. Confirm it or be humiliated in GT.>>

Games under 99.2% only, unverified sessions don't count.

Cogno

Tick, tick, tick.....

<<No more nonsense. You have until noon today to confirm, and I will

not

change one thing about the play strategy that you seem so sure does

not and

···

cannot win. That's your bet. Confirm it or be humiliated in GT.>>

Games under 99.2% only, unverified sessions don't count.

Cogno

2 hours and 21 minutes from now, my fingers will begin the humiliation
of Congo. 2 hours and 21 minutes! That's how much time you have to save
face, geek.

No Rob,once again you disingenously change the terms of a
straightforward bet, then claim victory when your absurd counteroffer
is not accepted.
Mission Accomplished in the same way that your hero claims victory.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "aces_hii" <aces_hii@y...> wrote:

2 hours and 21 minutes from now, my fingers will begin the humiliation
of Congo. 2 hours and 21 minutes! That's how much time you have to save
face, geek.

1 hour, 20 minutes for confirmation of the bet Congo proposed, and now
squeals away from. 1 hour, 20 minutes before the destruction of this
wimp begins. 1 hour, 20 minutes for him to come out of his shell and
admit he's the most jealous person the world has even seen when it
comes to Rob Singer, and 1 hour, 20 minutes until he's exposed in
Gaming Today as the biggest squirming weasel of all time....next to
Fezzik, that is. 1 hour, 20 minutes..... Tick, trick, tick.......

No Rob,once again you disingenously change the terms of a
straightforward bet, then claim victory when your absurd counteroffer
is not accepted. I've lost count of the number of times this has
happened, but Cogno should add it to his FAQ.
Mission Accomplished in the same way that your hero claims victory.
Now back to you, the Energizer bunny of pathological liars.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "aces_hii" <aces_hii@y...> wrote:

1 hour, 20 minutes for confirmation of the bet Congo proposed, and now
squeals away from. 1 hour, 20 minutes before the destruction of this
wimp begins. 1 hour, 20 minutes for him to come out of his shell and
admit he's the most jealous person the world has even seen when it
comes to Rob Singer, and 1 hour, 20 minutes until he's exposed in
Gaming Today as the biggest squirming weasel of all time....next to
Fezzik, that is. 1 hour, 20 minutes..... Tick, trick, tick.......

A humma humma..... Next time say it in ONE post. Obviously, you're
just another weeny who loves to hate to love me. Love it!

Explain 'counteroffer'. &Your hero continuously comes out and says my
strategy is a fraud, then when faced with actually betting me on
backing up his weasel words, wants me to CHANGE the rules of my Play
Strategy?? Yo stupido, you get it yet?

For Congo: Tick, tick, tick.... Not much longer before his nerdy
world of statistics and theory comes crashing down upon him. Not much
longer before he pees his pants. Not much longer before all that self-
proclaimed intellect is rendered useless as he scrambles to tell his
friends " hey, it's not MY fault...That Rob singer guy just has got
too much intelligence to be steamrolled by a geek like me!" Tick,
tick, tick.....

No Rob,once again you disingenously change the terms of a
straightforward bet, then claim victory when your absurd

counteroffer

is not accepted. I've lost count of the number of times this has
happened, but Cogno should add it to his FAQ.
Mission Accomplished in the same way that your hero claims victory.
Now back to you, the Energizer bunny of pathological liars.

>
> 1 hour, 20 minutes for confirmation of the bet Congo proposed,

and now

> squeals away from. 1 hour, 20 minutes before the destruction of

this

> wimp begins. 1 hour, 20 minutes for him to come out of his shell

and

> admit he's the most jealous person the world has even seen when

it

> comes to Rob Singer, and 1 hour, 20 minutes until he's exposed in
> Gaming Today as the biggest squirming weasel of all time....next

to

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "vpbob_2000" <vpbob1@c...> wrote:

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "aces_hii" <aces_hii@y...> wrote:
> Fezzik, that is. 1 hour, 20 minutes..... Tick, trick, tick.......
>