vpFREE2 Forums

Higher Theo for Privileges

In a message dated 12/14/2007 4:23:09 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,
mel3dmd@yahoo.com writes:

I spoke to my host today regarding Sachem and she told me that
even for VP players it has not been raised to 2000. It is still at
1500. All other info she has given me has always been correct so I
assume this is also.

Makes sense. If they have lowered the theos in the 9/6 JB, it would have
been a double hit to increase the theo daily requirement. Not that they
wouldn't have done it. :smiley:

**************************************See AOL's top rated recipes
(http://food.aol.com/top-rated-recipes?NCID=aoltop00030000000004)

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

My wife has just been re-instated as Sachem. It took six months of
disciplined play keeping theo above $1500/day. On the two trips prior
to re-instatement she did a good chunk of her action on the evil evil
9/5 JB $1 Multistrike (~98.5% EV). But the machine was good to us
with a dealt royal on level 2. I remember a thread speaking to
several inputs to determine Sachem. Its a lot of work doing $1500/day
theo on $1 machines.
Reno for 5 days end of January. Thanks Harrahs.
Just got an offer for junket to AC from Harrahs - No thanks but
thanks for providing competition to Fox and the SUN (not to mention
Twin Rivers :-))
David and Teresa in Boston

In a message dated 12/14/2007 4:23:09 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,
mel3dmd@... writes:

I spoke to my host today regarding Sachem and she told me that
even for VP players it has not been raised to 2000. It is still at
1500. All other info she has given me has always been correct so I
assume this is also.

Makes sense. If they have lowered the theos in the 9/6 JB, it

would have

been a double hit to increase the theo daily requirement. Not

that they

ยทยทยท

--- In vpFREE_NewEngland@yahoogroups.com, vp1040@... wrote:

wouldn't have done it. :smiley:

**************************************See AOL's top rated recipes
(http://food.aol.com/top-rated-recipes?NCID=aoltop00030000000004)

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]