vpFREE2 Forums

Goodbye

Dan Paymar wrote:

I am sad to have to say that it is longer possible for me to
contribute to this forum. There is no value in participating where I
am not allowed to respond directly after another member posts lies
about me and goes undisciplined and only very mildly chastised.

As I've told Dan Paymar several times, he is welcome to respond
to posts as long as he doesn't make negative personal comments.

The facts are:

1. I rejected a post by Dan Paymar that contained negative
personal comments about another member. In so doing
I advised him that he could repost on vpFREE without the
negative comments or he could post the message as is on
FREEvpFREE.

2. In a subsequent private email he complained that he wasn't
allowed to respond to the post on vpFREE, ignoring that I had
already told him it was OK to respond to the post if he didn't
include negative personal comments. I replied:

"As I told you, you're welcome to factually defend your post on
vpFREE as long as it doesn't contain negative comments about
Dancer. Any negative comments belong on FREEvpFREE."

3. In yet another private email he once again ignored what I had
previously told him and once again complained that he wasn't
allowed to respond to the post. I replied:

"Of course you are/were allowed to respond, if you keep it
non-personal ..."

vpFREE Administrator

I couldn't agree more!
If Dan P. can't even follow the Rules or a simple request from the
Administrator about "not making negative personal comments" and at
the same time still trying to advertise his product(s) in almost all
his posts/replies, we should hold the door wide open for him and
say "Goodbye".
He asked for volunteers to test/check out his new vp software. You
responded and said "I'm interested.". Does he even know how to
say "Thank you" for at least trying to show you you wanted to help
out in the early testing stage? Of course not. (ooops...negative)
sorry.....the end.

--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, vpFREE Administrator <vp_free@y...>
wrote:

Dan Paymar wrote:

> I am sad to have to say that it is longer possible for me to
> contribute to this forum. There is no value in participating

where I

> am not allowed to respond directly after another member posts

lies

···

> about me and goes undisciplined and only very mildly chastised.

As I've told Dan Paymar several times, he is welcome to respond
to posts as long as he doesn't make negative personal comments.

The facts are:

1. I rejected a post by Dan Paymar that contained negative
personal comments about another member. In so doing
I advised him that he could repost on vpFREE without the
negative comments or he could post the message as is on
FREEvpFREE.

2. In a subsequent private email he complained that he wasn't
allowed to respond to the post on vpFREE, ignoring that I had
already told him it was OK to respond to the post if he didn't
include negative personal comments. I replied:

"As I told you, you're welcome to factually defend your post on
vpFREE as long as it doesn't contain negative comments about
Dancer. Any negative comments belong on FREEvpFREE."

3. In yet another private email he once again ignored what I had
previously told him and once again complained that he wasn't
allowed to respond to the post. I replied:

"Of course you are/were allowed to respond, if you keep it
non-personal ..."

vpFREE Administrator

Confrintation is good. Negative is not.

gilbert_616 <gilbert_616@yahoo.com> wrote: I couldn't agree more!
If Dan P. can't even follow the Rules or a simple request from the
Administrator about "not making negative personal comments" and at
the same time still trying to advertise his product(s) in almost all
his posts/replies, we should hold the door wide open for him and
say "Goodbye".
He asked for volunteers to test/check out his new vp software. You
responded and said "I'm interested.". Does he even know how to
say "Thank you" for at least trying to show you you wanted to help
out in the early testing stage? Of course not. (ooops...negative)
sorry.....the end.

--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, vpFREE Administrator <vp_free@y...>
wrote:

Dan Paymar wrote:

> I am sad to have to say that it is longer possible for me to
> contribute to this forum. There is no value in participating

where I

> am not allowed to respond directly after another member posts

lies

> about me and goes undisciplined and only very mildly chastised.

As I've told Dan Paymar several times, he is welcome to respond
to posts as long as he doesn't make negative personal comments.

The facts are:

1. I rejected a post by Dan Paymar that contained negative
personal comments about another member. In so doing
I advised him that he could repost on vpFREE without the
negative comments or he could post the message as is on
FREEvpFREE.

2. In a subsequent private email he complained that he wasn't
allowed to respond to the post on vpFREE, ignoring that I had
already told him it was OK to respond to the post if he didn't
include negative personal comments. I replied:

"As I told you, you're welcome to factually defend your post on
vpFREE as long as it doesn't contain negative comments about
Dancer. Any negative comments belong on FREEvpFREE."

3. In yet another private email he once again ignored what I had
previously told him and once again complained that he wasn't
allowed to respond to the post. I replied:

"Of course you are/were allowed to respond, if you keep it
non-personal ..."

vpFREE Administrator

vpFREE Links: http://members.cox.net/vpfree/Links.htm

  SPONSORED LINKS
        Online gambling Outdoor recreation Recreation software Gambling

···

---------------------------------
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS

    Visit your group "vpFREE" on the web.
    
    To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
vpFREE-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
    
    Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

---------------------------------
  
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]