--- In vpFREE_Reno@yahoogroups.com, "William Canevari"
<wcanevari@...> wrote:
they are refering to the IGT blackjack game on the VP machines that
had a payout of 100.3% or so due to the paytable being set at 99.7%
(BJ pays 5for2, double down on 10 & 11, split aces, dealer stands on
soft 17), but there was a flaw in the chip that allowed a player to
split aces, and then if dealt another ace, split again.
My sources got back to me on this game. First, (a) re-splitting aces
to four hands adds at MOST something like 4 basis points (0.04%) to
the return, (b) composition dependent hands -- excluding 6 card
autowinner -- added at most another 3 basis points (.03%), and (c)
the 6-card autowinner added another 5 basis points (.05%) at most.
That is at most 12 basis points (0.12%) in the player's favor.
By the way, the GAME was HIT SOFT 17, which is about 17 basis points
(0.17%) AGAINST the player. That H17 rule negated all the benefits
from the previous paragraph. Also, keep in mind there was no soft
doubling.
Lastly, the 99.7% return ALREADY included (a) the Double after split
on 10 and 11 and (b) split aces catch paint pays 5 for 2 that was
never stated as rules.
Basically, William Canevari is double counting some of the rules and
perpetuating an "urban legend." There was a WMS video blackjack that
had a return over 100% and many people have confused the IGT game
with the WMS game. People who kept detailed records knows WMS and
Bally's have a history of making mistakes in games. For example,
Bally's created a video poker game where a player could hit a royal
flush in as little as 12,000 hands (Bally's also made a mistake
calculating the return for Pick'em). WMS has so many mistakes when
it came to calculating returns in video poker -- Multi-Pay, Money
Fever, etc.