vpFREE2 Forums

Give it up!

#121

Sorry, you've provided no proof that Dan was an addict. I suspect
this is another in the long line of your assertions based on

nothing.

But just take a look in the mirror little dicky....you're living
proof!

> And BTW--Just as Scott Peterson was convicted totally on
> circumstancial evidence, you're more transparent in your fate

than

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@...> wrote:

> even he was. I've already discovered how much you've been losing-

-

Lie. If you had any evidence whatsoever you'd plaster it all over

the

internet. All you do by posting this garbage is demonstrate how

badly

I've beaten you in every respect.

Unlike you, I don't just 'plaster things all over the Internet'
because of the same reason that always gets your goat: I'm a name
and you're a nobody! No wonder you like to chant "I've won, I've
won!"

> Only a geek could have pride in a white-trash townhouse. People

who

> buy that crap haven't the REAL money to live in a REAL home. I

can

> imagine what kind of dump you suffer through in Minn.

A 3700 sqft dump on a 2 acre wooded lot. Now you won't have to
imagine. You can just whine and moan.

Are you serious? I don't take a second look unless the house is AT
LEAST 4500. My garage alone is 1200 to fit all the classic cars!
Besides, 90% of houses in Minn. are dumpy because they're at least
50 years old and plagued with insect festations. But lets get back
to the "Townhouse" in addict-land. I believe you agree it's a white
trash method of making believe one lives the fantasy life.

> > RUFF RUFF. Yes, but pretty much all gamblers know what a Benji
is.
> > Are you claiming you've never heard of this usage? LMAO.
>
> It's what nickel players call money they rarely see.

ROTFLMAO. You are such a dufus.

Ask any of your 'friends' and you'll wake up to yet another truth.

. Did you think you played better while drinking?

>
> As I said, I only have 2 a day, and it's because of an article

from

> the Harvard Medical Journal. And guess what--it works! Other

than

my
> foot--in which I've almost completely put the pain out of my

mind--

> I'm in almost perfect shape. Them drinks sure do the right

things!

Just to bring you up to date. There's now doubt in some

researchers'

minds that a couple of drinks does anything to help the heart. The
whole issue is back on the table. Of course, we all know why you
really drink. Although I do believe you limit yourself to at most

two

cases ... uh, bottles ...

There's always doubt, and just like we have here with your doubt
about something superior to you--me--there are idiots who say they
doubt anything just because they're jealous they didn't figure it
all out first. Tsk tsk tsk.....

> > > Wait...Wait! You don't have 'the advantage' yet you believe

you

> > will beat the odds. I wonder....is that how you play video

poker

> also?
> >
> > Nope, machines don't choke.
>
> I assume you're talking about you. A brute machine on and off

the

> court! AHAHAHAHAHA!!!! Oh, my aching side!!!!!!!!!!

You "assumed" wrong. Looks like I'll have to explain another

obvious

comment to dufus boy. The "machines" I referenced were VP machines

in

response to your statement "is that how you play video poker". The
inference was obvious and meant that YOU will choke so I don't

need

an advantage. I bet your side really aches now.

Yup, it didn't get any better with THAT hilarious rant!!

> Now I'll correct you once AGAIN! You as usual were jealous of my
> passport and education and said I lied, so I challenged you to

meet

> me on a radio show in person where I'd present the documents and
> prove to you at institutions and on the computer that they were

all

> real--first for $5k then for $20k when you complained

that "anyone

> could fake the docs with a $100 printer". You came back with a

wimp-

> out NO, and instead challenged me to play tennis (snicker

snicker).

Sorry, but everyone can go back and read what ACTUALLY happened. I
immediately said NO to the radio show. The documents were never

part

of the discussion and the tennis match was in response to your
wanting to see old and fat (this is a thread on BMI) me. Want

more?

See:

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FREEvpFREE/message/3168

Here's the highlights.

RGM said:
Or, we could meet at the bowling lanes, golf course or tennis
courts ...

Dufus replied:
I don't bowl anymore--too many degenerates hanging around those
filthy places. Esp. in LV--they gotta all be video poker local
addicts. Tennis--I play 3 times a week under the lights. Set up a
time and place ...

This is what followed in:

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FREEvpFREE/message/3176

RGM said:
The tennis match? Should be fun.

Dufus replied:
... Tennis is fine, but I'll warn you in advance. My technique

isn't

very good, but my stamina is Aces. I'd like to play best of 7. You
could win in 4 sets.

Just the facts ... again. Now, tell us again about the $10K bet?

See

anything in any of your remarks that indicated a bet would be
necessary? Nope.

So laughable yet so sad. You left out the part about the docs that
the radio appearance was all about! $5k then $20k. Now you're in a
spot that you can't slime out of and you're trying some of that
creative stuff that you know won't get by me. Live up to the fact
that you either show up with the cash or be made the laughing stock
of your own TOWN! HAHAHAHA!!

> I
> agreed to compromise

Can't compromise when there was nothing to compromise on. If I had
agreed to be on the radio show that would be different.

> by dropping the requirement for you to show up
> to back up your lies, and instead to put your money on the line

for

> the match.

Sorry, the archives don't lie. I declined the radio show and

offered

up the tennis match to give you a chance to see me in person. Now,
you're trying to lie your way out of it and I'm making you look

like

a complete fool. LMAO.

I understand you're stuck and I love to see you scrambling around
aimlessly. show up or beware....

> But as usual, as soon as you saw money involved--of which
> you have little to none--you took the loophole route once again

and

> chickened out.

Money was never in the bet.

HAHAHA! A BET without MONEY? Looks like your word-twisting's got you
tangled in your own web again!

It's the only way you think you can

escape getting whipped. It completely obvious to everyone, dufus.
You've now been backed into the corner. Accept or back out.

> It's all in the archives and will go into the article
> just as that....

Now that I've brought you up-to-date on what is really in the
archives I guess all you can do is cry in your beer.

I take it you won't play me for the money--even after saying you
KNOW you'll beat me. May Las Vegas have mercy on you when you step
out in public in a few weeks.....

> All you need do is print those magic words--I WILL PLAY YOU FOR
> $10,000! Simple as that. I'll be there either way on the 11th at
> 10am, not the 12th as you corrected. With $10k. So either way I
need
> you to identify a spot where we'll meet. You have the money we
play.
> You don't, I have fun with you in my column....you know, the one
> you "DON'T READ"!! No more fumbling with words or looking for

more

> loopholes to escape through. Act like a grown man and use one of
your
> famous loopholes to escape being an introvert for an hour or

two.

> It's all in little dicky's hands now......

The babble continues. All I can do know now is assumed you've

backed

out. I've given you many chances to accept and you've shown just

what

a complete and miserable coward will do to avoid being whipped by
what you've called a "fat old man" with "jiggling titties". Puts

it

all perspecive for everyone.

I guess you didn't read the next post. Might as well make believe it
isn't there cause it's nothing but heartburn hotel for little dicky.

#122

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@...>
wrote:

>
> Sorry, you've provided no proof that Dan was an addict. I suspect
> this is another in the long line of your assertions based on
nothing.

But just take a look in the mirror little dicky....you're living
proof!

If that's the case then you're categorically stating that Dan is NOT
and addict. That's fine by me.

>
> > And BTW--Just as Scott Peterson was convicted totally on
> > circumstancial evidence, you're more transparent in your fate
than
> > even he was. I've already discovered how much you've been

losing-

-
>
> Lie. If you had any evidence whatsoever you'd plaster it all over
the
> internet. All you do by posting this garbage is demonstrate how
badly
> I've beaten you in every respect.

Unlike you, I don't just 'plaster things all over the Internet'
because of the same reason that always gets your goat: I'm a name
and you're a nobody! No wonder you like to chant "I've won, I've
won!"

But you see, I have won. Every time you post a claim and then back
down when confronted, you are the loser. You'd think you would have
caught on by now.

>
> > Only a geek could have pride in a white-trash townhouse. People
who
> > buy that crap haven't the REAL money to live in a REAL home. I
can
> > imagine what kind of dump you suffer through in Minn.
>
> A 3700 sqft dump on a 2 acre wooded lot. Now you won't have to
> imagine. You can just whine and moan.

Are you serious? I don't take a second look unless the house is AT
LEAST 4500.

Did anyone expect anything else?

My garage alone is 1200 to fit all the classic cars!
Besides, 90% of houses in Minn. are dumpy because they're at least
50 years old and plagued with insect festations.

Please provide evidence to support this nonsense ... or, look like a
fool once again.

But lets get back
to the "Townhouse" in addict-land. I believe you agree it's a white
trash method of making believe one lives the fantasy life.

Nope, it's all the two of us need. It's not great, it's not bad. It's
adequate.

>. Did you think you played better while drinking?
> >
> > As I said, I only have 2 a day, and it's because of an article
from
> > the Harvard Medical Journal. And guess what--it works! Other
than
> my
> > foot--in which I've almost completely put the pain out of my
mind--
> > I'm in almost perfect shape. Them drinks sure do the right
things!
>
> Just to bring you up to date. There's now doubt in some
researchers'
> minds that a couple of drinks does anything to help the heart.

The

> whole issue is back on the table. Of course, we all know why you
> really drink. Although I do believe you limit yourself to at most
two
> cases ... uh, bottles ...

There's always doubt, and just like we have here with your doubt
about something superior to you--me--there are idiots who say they
doubt anything just because they're jealous they didn't figure it
all out first. Tsk tsk tsk.....

No. It was pretty much accepted until new information raised doubt.
Like many studies you have to look for associative behavior that may
be the cause. For example, if it turned out that people who had two
drinks also liked to jog, then the implication that the two drinks
were effective would be in question.

>
> > > > Wait...Wait! You don't have 'the advantage' yet you believe
you
> > > will beat the odds. I wonder....is that how you play video
poker
> > also?
> > >
> > > Nope, machines don't choke.
> >
> > I assume you're talking about you. A brute machine on and off
the
> > court! AHAHAHAHAHA!!!! Oh, my aching side!!!!!!!!!!
>
> You "assumed" wrong. Looks like I'll have to explain another
obvious
> comment to dufus boy. The "machines" I referenced were VP

machines

in
> response to your statement "is that how you play video poker".

The

> inference was obvious and meant that YOU will choke so I don't
need
> an advantage. I bet your side really aches now.

Yup, it didn't get any better with THAT hilarious rant!!

Didn't think it would. You can play dumb but you can't hide from the
facts.

>
> > Now I'll correct you once AGAIN! You as usual were jealous of

my

> > passport and education and said I lied, so I challenged you to
meet
> > me on a radio show in person where I'd present the documents

and

> > prove to you at institutions and on the computer that they were
all
> > real--first for $5k then for $20k when you complained
that "anyone
> > could fake the docs with a $100 printer". You came back with a
wimp-
> > out NO, and instead challenged me to play tennis (snicker
snicker).
>
> Sorry, but everyone can go back and read what ACTUALLY happened.

I

> immediately said NO to the radio show. The documents were never
part
> of the discussion and the tennis match was in response to your
> wanting to see old and fat (this is a thread on BMI) me. Want
more?
> See:
>
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FREEvpFREE/message/3168
>
> Here's the highlights.
>
> RGM said:
> Or, we could meet at the bowling lanes, golf course or tennis
> courts ...
>
> Dufus replied:
> I don't bowl anymore--too many degenerates hanging around those
> filthy places. Esp. in LV--they gotta all be video poker local
> addicts. Tennis--I play 3 times a week under the lights. Set up a
> time and place ...
>
> This is what followed in:
>
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FREEvpFREE/message/3176
>
> RGM said:
> The tennis match? Should be fun.
>
> Dufus replied:
> ... Tennis is fine, but I'll warn you in advance. My technique
isn't
> very good, but my stamina is Aces. I'd like to play best of 7.

You

> could win in 4 sets.
>
> Just the facts ... again. Now, tell us again about the $10K bet?
See
> anything in any of your remarks that indicated a bet would be
> necessary? Nope.

So laughable yet so sad. You left out the part about the docs that
the radio appearance was all about! $5k then $20k.

Nope. Never was and never will be. You can issue all the POTENTIAL
bets you want, but until I accept one they are meaningless. I bet you
a $100K right now that I'll be 60 years old by Saturday. What does
this mean? It means exactly the same as the bets you're referring to.

I never accepted the those bets ... you accepted the tennis
challenge. It's really that easy.

> > I
> > agreed to compromise
>
> Can't compromise when there was nothing to compromise on. If I

had

> agreed to be on the radio show that would be different.
>
> > by dropping the requirement for you to show up
> > to back up your lies, and instead to put your money on the line
for
> > the match.
>
> Sorry, the archives don't lie. I declined the radio show and
offered
> up the tennis match to give you a chance to see me in person.

Now,

> you're trying to lie your way out of it and I'm making you look
like
> a complete fool. LMAO.

I understand you're stuck and I love to see you scrambling around
aimlessly. show up or beware....

Chuckle, chuckle.

>
> > But as usual, as soon as you saw money involved--of which
> > you have little to none--you took the loophole route once again
and
> > chickened out.
>
> Money was never in the bet.

HAHAHA! A BET without MONEY? Looks like your word-twisting's got

you

tangled in your own web again!

Nope.

It's the only way you think you can
> escape getting whipped. It completely obvious to everyone, dufus.
> You've now been backed into the corner. Accept or back out.
>
> > It's all in the archives and will go into the article
> > just as that....
>
> Now that I've brought you up-to-date on what is really in the
> archives I guess all you can do is cry in your beer.

I take it you won't play me for the money--even after saying you
KNOW you'll beat me. May Las Vegas have mercy on you when you step
out in public in a few weeks.....

Yawn. You must mean the extra congrats I'll be getting for showing
you up ONE MORE TIME.

>
> > All you need do is print those magic words--I WILL PLAY YOU FOR
> > $10,000! Simple as that. I'll be there either way on the 11th

at

> > 10am, not the 12th as you corrected. With $10k. So either way I
> need
> > you to identify a spot where we'll meet. You have the money we
> play.
> > You don't, I have fun with you in my column....you know, the

one

> > you "DON'T READ"!! No more fumbling with words or looking for
more
> > loopholes to escape through. Act like a grown man and use one

of

> your
> > famous loopholes to escape being an introvert for an hour or
two.
> > It's all in little dicky's hands now......
>
> The babble continues. All I can do know now is assumed you've
backed
> out. I've given you many chances to accept and you've shown just
what
> a complete and miserable coward will do to avoid being whipped by
> what you've called a "fat old man" with "jiggling titties". Puts
it
> all perspecive for everyone.

I guess you didn't read the next post. Might as well make believe

it

isn't there cause it's nothing but heartburn hotel for little dicky.

I haven't seen your next posts but I can imagine. You'll once again
claim victory ... even in obvious defeat. What a surprise.

I tell you what little man. If you really want to bet then lets' make
it two matches. One on the bowling lanes and one on the tennis
courts. We'll take the $10K and split it $5K for each match. While I
haven't played tennis in 4 years I have managed to get in some
bowling. Although the knee is still a problem in my bowling I think
that should level the playing field. There are plenty of nice bowling
lanes in LV. New one at Southcoast, new one at Sunset, I think the
Sams Town lanes are open 24 hrs. a day.

Now you've got a real bet on your hands. Let's see Robbie scramble
now.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@> wrote:

#123

> > Sorry, you've provided no proof that Dan was an addict. I

suspect

> > this is another in the long line of your assertions based on
> nothing.
>
> But just take a look in the mirror little dicky....you're living
> proof!

If that's the case then you're categorically stating that Dan is

NOT and addict. That's fine by me.

Funny, but I never said he WAS an addict. I said he was a
loser....just like you. Will you ever be able to read with
comprehension?

> >
> > > And BTW--Just as Scott Peterson was convicted totally on
> > > circumstancial evidence, you're more transparent in your fate
> than
> > > even he was. I've already discovered how much you've been
losing-
> -
> >
> > Lie. If you had any evidence whatsoever you'd plaster it all

over

> the
> > internet. All you do by posting this garbage is demonstrate how
> badly
> > I've beaten you in every respect.
>
> Unlike you, I don't just 'plaster things all over the Internet'
> because of the same reason that always gets your goat: I'm a name
> and you're a nobody! No wonder you like to chant "I've won, I've
> won!"

But you see, I have won. Every time you post a claim and then back
down when confronted, you are the loser. You'd think you would have
caught on by now.

More funnies. "But you see, I have won". Permit me to laugh! Posting
a claim, and no ability to 'back it up'. Hmmm.... Just how much of a
farce will you become before you finally get the picture?

> >
> > > Only a geek could have pride in a white-trash townhouse.

People

> who
> > > buy that crap haven't the REAL money to live in a REAL home.

I

> can
> > > imagine what kind of dump you suffer through in Minn.
> >
> > A 3700 sqft dump on a 2 acre wooded lot. Now you won't have to
> > imagine. You can just whine and moan.
>
> Are you serious? I don't take a second look unless the house is

AT LEAST 4500.

Did anyone expect anything else?

More envy. My my my.....

> My garage alone is 1200 to fit all the classic cars!
> Besides, 90% of houses in Minn. are dumpy because they're at

least

> 50 years old and plagued with insect festations.

Please provide evidence to support this nonsense ... or, look like

a fool once again.

Minnesote? HAHA! Land of too much cold weather, too many bugs, and
too many funny-talking people who never should leave the state.

> But lets get back
> to the "Townhouse" in addict-land. I believe you agree it's a

white

> trash method of making believe one lives the fantasy life.

Nope, it's all the two of us need. It's not great, it's not bad.

It's adequate.....

.....and it's a white-trash dump.

> > Just to bring you up to date. There's now doubt in some
> researchers'
> > minds that a couple of drinks does anything to help the heart.
The
> > whole issue is back on the table. Of course, we all know why

you

> > really drink. Although I do believe you limit yourself to at

most

> two
> > cases ... uh, bottles ...
>
> There's always doubt, and just like we have here with your doubt
> about something superior to you--me--there are idiots who say

they

> doubt anything just because they're jealous they didn't figure it
> all out first. Tsk tsk tsk.....

No. It was pretty much accepted until new information raised doubt.
Like many studies you have to look for associative behavior that

may

be the cause. For example, if it turned out that people who had two
drinks also liked to jog, then the implication that the two drinks
were effective would be in question.

I like to jog little dicky. I like two drinks a day little dicky. Can
you milk me too?

> >
> > > > > Wait...Wait! You don't have 'the advantage' yet you

believe

> you
> > > > will beat the odds. I wonder....is that how you play video
> poker
> > > also?
> > > >
> > > > Nope, machines don't choke.
> > >
> > > I assume you're talking about you. A brute machine on and off
> the
> > > court! AHAHAHAHAHA!!!! Oh, my aching side!!!!!!!!!!
> >
> > You "assumed" wrong. Looks like I'll have to explain another
> obvious
> > comment to dufus boy. The "machines" I referenced were VP
machines
> in
> > response to your statement "is that how you play video poker".
The
> > inference was obvious and meant that YOU will choke so I don't
> need
> > an advantage. I bet your side really aches now.
>
> Yup, it didn't get any better with THAT hilarious rant!!

Didn't think it would. You can play dumb but you can't hide from

the facts.

All we saw was your mumble-jumble again. You're so obvious when you
get shaken and then confused. A short ramble follows that's all over
the map. You're lost somewhere between Minnetonka and Green Valley.

> >
> > > Now I'll correct you once AGAIN! You as usual were jealous of
my
> > > passport and education and said I lied, so I challenged you

to

> meet
> > > me on a radio show in person where I'd present the documents
and
> > > prove to you at institutions and on the computer that they

were

> all
> > > real--first for $5k then for $20k when you complained
> that "anyone
> > > could fake the docs with a $100 printer". You came back with

a

> wimp-
> > > out NO, and instead challenged me to play tennis (snicker
> snicker).
> >
> > Sorry, but everyone can go back and read what ACTUALLY

happened.

I
> > immediately said NO to the radio show. The documents were never
> part
> > of the discussion and the tennis match was in response to your
> > wanting to see old and fat (this is a thread on BMI) me. Want
> more?
> > See:
> >
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FREEvpFREE/message/3168
> >
> > Here's the highlights.
> >
> > RGM said:
> > Or, we could meet at the bowling lanes, golf course or tennis
> > courts ...
> >
> > Dufus replied:
> > I don't bowl anymore--too many degenerates hanging around those
> > filthy places. Esp. in LV--they gotta all be video poker local
> > addicts. Tennis--I play 3 times a week under the lights. Set up

a

> > time and place ...
> >
> > This is what followed in:
> >
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FREEvpFREE/message/3176
> >
> > RGM said:
> > The tennis match? Should be fun.
> >
> > Dufus replied:
> > ... Tennis is fine, but I'll warn you in advance. My technique
> isn't
> > very good, but my stamina is Aces. I'd like to play best of 7.
You
> > could win in 4 sets.
> >
> > Just the facts ... again. Now, tell us again about the $10K

bet?

> See
> > anything in any of your remarks that indicated a bet would be
> > necessary? Nope.
>
> So laughable yet so sad. You left out the part about the docs

that

> the radio appearance was all about! $5k then $20k.

Nope. Never was and never will be. You can issue all the POTENTIAL
bets you want, but until I accept one they are meaningless. I bet

you

a $100K right now that I'll be 60 years old by Saturday. What does
this mean? It means exactly the same as the bets you're referring

to.

Still such a confused little boy. You called me a liar which led to
the radio show invite and the bet. When you didn't have the spine to
face me and back up your nonsense you changed it around to a tennis
match--which you claimed this time that you could not lose to me. I
accepted with a $10k rider bet. Again, you chickened out via one more
of your loophole that geeks are famous for creating when they wet
their pants. Mano-a-mano or some crackpot baloney like that. Bottom
line: Be there or beware!

> > Sorry, the archives don't lie. I declined the radio show and
> offered
> > up the tennis match to give you a chance to see me in person.
Now,
> > you're trying to lie your way out of it and I'm making you look
> like
> > a complete fool. LMAO.
>
> I understand you're stuck and I love to see you scrambling around
> aimlessly. show up or beware....

Chuckle, chuckle.

> >
> > > But as usual, as soon as you saw money involved--of which
> > > you have little to none--you took the loophole route once

again

> and
> > > chickened out.
> >
> > Money was never in the bet.

Money is ALWAYS in a bet. Um, why don't you read your archives that
you spend all that time looking up hoping that they've been deleted?

>
> HAHAHA! A BET without MONEY? Looks like your word-twisting's got
you
> tangled in your own web again!

Nope.

Yup.

> It's the only way you think you can
> > escape getting whipped. It completely obvious to everyone,

dufus.

> > You've now been backed into the corner. Accept or back out.
> >
> > > It's all in the archives and will go into the article
> > > just as that....
> >
> > Now that I've brought you up-to-date on what is really in the
> > archives I guess all you can do is cry in your beer.
>
> I take it you won't play me for the money--even after saying you
> KNOW you'll beat me. May Las Vegas have mercy on you when you

step

> out in public in a few weeks.....

Yawn. You must mean the extra congrats I'll be getting for showing
you up ONE MORE TIME.

....as I bask in the glory of bloddying up another nerd over and over
again!

> >
> > > All you need do is print those magic words--I WILL PLAY YOU

FOR

> > > $10,000! Simple as that. I'll be there either way on the 11th
at
> > > 10am, not the 12th as you corrected. With $10k. So either way

I

> > need
> > > you to identify a spot where we'll meet. You have the money

we

> > play.
> > > You don't, I have fun with you in my column....you know, the
one
> > > you "DON'T READ"!! No more fumbling with words or looking for
> more
> > > loopholes to escape through. Act like a grown man and use one
of
> > your
> > > famous loopholes to escape being an introvert for an hour or
> two.
> > > It's all in little dicky's hands now......
> >
> > The babble continues. All I can do know now is assumed you've
> backed
> > out. I've given you many chances to accept and you've shown

just

> what
> > a complete and miserable coward will do to avoid being whipped

by

> > what you've called a "fat old man" with "jiggling titties".

Puts

> it
> > all perspecive for everyone.
>
> I guess you didn't read the next post. Might as well make believe
it
> isn't there cause it's nothing but heartburn hotel for little

dicky.

I haven't seen your next posts but I can imagine. You'll once again
claim victory ... even in obvious defeat. What a surprise.

Now THERE'S a post that radiates stomach acid BIG time!!

I tell you what little man. If you really want to bet then lets'

make

it two matches. One on the bowling lanes and one on the tennis
courts. We'll take the $10K and split it $5K for each match. While

I

haven't played tennis in 4 years I have managed to get in some
bowling. Although the knee is still a problem in my bowling I think
that should level the playing field. There are plenty of nice

bowling

lanes in LV. New one at Southcoast, new one at Sunset, I think the
Sams Town lanes are open 24 hrs. a day.

Now you've got a real bet on your hands. Let's see Robbie scramble
now.

Real bet for real men: Tennis first. No negotiations. $10k. I will
also bowl you for $5k on Sunday. But not at a dump like Sam's Town.
Pick somewhere else. Southcoast. I'm leaving tonight at 1am so don't
go to sleep. BTW--my balls hurt today. Does that count as a lame
excuse too?

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@...> wrote:

#124

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@...>
wrote:

>
> > > Sorry, you've provided no proof that Dan was an addict. I
suspect
> > > this is another in the long line of your assertions based on
> > nothing.
> >
> > But just take a look in the mirror little dicky....you're

living

> > proof!
>
> If that's the case then you're categorically stating that Dan is
NOT and addict. That's fine by me.

Funny, but I never said he WAS an addict. I said he was a
loser....just like you. Will you ever be able to read with
comprehension?

The dufus stated in:

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FREEvpFREE/message/3461

"Like an addict would just get up and leave out of nowhere"

LMAO! How many times have I proved you wrong?

> > >
> > > > Only a geek could have pride in a white-trash townhouse.
People
> > who
> > > > buy that crap haven't the REAL money to live in a REAL

home.

I
> > can
> > > > imagine what kind of dump you suffer through in Minn.
> > >
> > > A 3700 sqft dump on a 2 acre wooded lot. Now you won't have

to

> > > imagine. You can just whine and moan.
> >
> > Are you serious? I don't take a second look unless the house is
AT LEAST 4500.
>
> Did anyone expect anything else?

More envy. My my my.....

Not a bit. You see I plan on selling the house and buying a townhouse
in MN also. No need for that much space. Some day you'll catch on.

>
> > My garage alone is 1200 to fit all the classic cars!
> > Besides, 90% of houses in Minn. are dumpy because they're at
least
> > 50 years old and plagued with insect festations.
>
> Please provide evidence to support this nonsense ... or, look

like

a fool once again.

Minnesote? HAHA! Land of too much cold weather, too many bugs, and
too many funny-talking people who never should leave the state.

In other words ... no evidence, just another waste of space by the
dufus.

>
> > But lets get back
> > to the "Townhouse" in addict-land. I believe you agree it's a
white
> > trash method of making believe one lives the fantasy life.
>
> Nope, it's all the two of us need. It's not great, it's not bad.
It's adequate.....

.....and it's a white-trash dump.

It's 8 years old, now. Don't think that would qualify as a dump. The
association maintains the outside, the recreation center is right
across the street. It has a security system to keep the bad elements
like you away. Like I said, adequate.

>
> > > Just to bring you up to date. There's now doubt in some
> > researchers'
> > > minds that a couple of drinks does anything to help the

heart.

> The
> > > whole issue is back on the table. Of course, we all know why
you
> > > really drink. Although I do believe you limit yourself to at
most
> > two
> > > cases ... uh, bottles ...
> >
> > There's always doubt, and just like we have here with your

doubt

> > about something superior to you--me--there are idiots who say
they
> > doubt anything just because they're jealous they didn't figure

it

> > all out first. Tsk tsk tsk.....
>
> No. It was pretty much accepted until new information raised

doubt.

> Like many studies you have to look for associative behavior that
may
> be the cause. For example, if it turned out that people who had

two

> drinks also liked to jog, then the implication that the two

drinks

> were effective would be in question.

I like to jog little dicky. I like two drinks a day little dicky.

Can

you milk me too?

Every day.

> > > Just the facts ... again. Now, tell us again about the $10K
bet?
> > See
> > > anything in any of your remarks that indicated a bet would be
> > > necessary? Nope.
> >
> > So laughable yet so sad. You left out the part about the docs
that
> > the radio appearance was all about! $5k then $20k.
>
> Nope. Never was and never will be. You can issue all the

POTENTIAL

> bets you want, but until I accept one they are meaningless. I bet
you
> a $100K right now that I'll be 60 years old by Saturday. What

does

> this mean? It means exactly the same as the bets you're referring
to.

Still such a confused little boy. You called me a liar which led to
the radio show invite and the bet.

You are a liar. That has nothing to do with the radio show. You just
lied above when you said you didn't call Dan an addict. You do it all
the time. I suspect 90% of your posts contain one kind of fabrication
or another. We can all see it, either change or get over it.

....as I bask in the glory of bloddying up another nerd over and

over

again!

You mean you'd bask in cowering out of the match. Interesting.

> I tell you what little man. If you really want to bet then lets'
make
> it two matches. One on the bowling lanes and one on the tennis
> courts. We'll take the $10K and split it $5K for each match.

While

I
> haven't played tennis in 4 years I have managed to get in some
> bowling. Although the knee is still a problem in my bowling I

think

> that should level the playing field. There are plenty of nice
bowling
> lanes in LV. New one at Southcoast, new one at Sunset, I think

the

> Sams Town lanes are open 24 hrs. a day.
>
> Now you've got a real bet on your hands. Let's see Robbie

scramble

> now.

Real bet for real men: Tennis first. No negotiations. $10k. I will
also bowl you for $5k on Sunday. But not at a dump like Sam's Town.
Pick somewhere else. Southcoast. I'm leaving tonight at 1am so

don't

go to sleep. BTW--my balls hurt today. Does that count as a lame
excuse too?

Probably. I offered a bet either accept it or don't. Your choice.
Southcoast is fine for SATURDAY morning. I haven't been there yet.
Sounds like you can't take two matches in a row. Maybe all that
choking is getting to you.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@> wrote:

#125

Not a bit. You see I plan on selling the house and buying a

townhouse in MN also. No need for that much space. Some day you'll
catch on.

Why don't you just come out and say it? You're losing at such a clip
that you WILL move full time to LV because first off, you'll sell
your house and have some more gambling money in your pocket that
should last at least as long as the Queen's lasted, and secondly,
because you couldn't care less of your wife's sensitivity to the sun.
Creep. You addicts are all alike.

> >
> > > My garage alone is 1200 to fit all the classic cars!
> > > Besides, 90% of houses in Minn. are dumpy because they're at
> least
> > > 50 years old and plagued with insect festations.
> >
> > Please provide evidence to support this nonsense ... or, look
like
> a fool once again.
>
> Minnesote? HAHA! Land of too much cold weather, too many bugs,

and

> too many funny-talking people who never should leave the state.

In other words ... no evidence, just another waste of space by the
dufus.

Looks like another direct hit to the statistical genius' mid section!

> >
> > > But lets get back
> > > to the "Townhouse" in addict-land. I believe you agree it's a
> white
> > > trash method of making believe one lives the fantasy life.
> >
> > Nope, it's all the two of us need. It's not great, it's not

bad.

> It's adequate.....
>
> .....and it's a white-trash dump.

It's 8 years old, now. Don't think that would qualify as a dump.

The

association maintains the outside, the recreation center is right
across the street. It has a security system to keep the bad

elements

like you away. Like I said, adequate.

Um, OK.

> Real bet for real men: Tennis first. No negotiations. $10k. I

will

> also bowl you for $5k on Sunday. But not at a dump like Sam's

Town.

> Pick somewhere else. Southcoast. I'm leaving tonight at 1am so
don't
> go to sleep. BTW--my balls hurt today. Does that count as a lame
> excuse too?

Probably. I offered a bet either accept it or don't. Your choice.
Southcoast is fine for SATURDAY morning. I haven't been there yet.
Sounds like you can't take two matches in a row. Maybe all that
choking is getting to you.

Let me guess. You found 2 loopholes here--#1: You're making believe
you didn't read this acceptance until AFTER I left. #2: You changed
the tennis bet to $5k thereby creating an escape clause. But don't
just read this over and over again. You can read all about it in a
few weeks along with the entire gambling world!

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@...> wrote:

#126

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@...>
wrote:

> Not a bit. You see I plan on selling the house and buying a
townhouse in MN also. No need for that much space. Some day you'll
catch on.

Why don't you just come out and say it? You're losing at such a

clip

that you WILL move full time to LV because first off, you'll sell
your house and have some more gambling money in your pocket

That would be a lie. Unlike you, I tell the truth.

> > Real bet for real men: Tennis first. No negotiations. $10k. I
will
> > also bowl you for $5k on Sunday. But not at a dump like Sam's
Town.
> > Pick somewhere else. Southcoast. I'm leaving tonight at 1am so
> don't
> > go to sleep. BTW--my balls hurt today. Does that count as a

lame

> > excuse too?
>
> Probably. I offered a bet either accept it or don't. Your choice.
> Southcoast is fine for SATURDAY morning. I haven't been there

yet.

> Sounds like you can't take two matches in a row. Maybe all that
> choking is getting to you.

Let me guess. You found 2 loopholes here--#1: You're making believe
you didn't read this acceptance until AFTER I left.

You wrote it a couple of hours before you left. What did you expect?
Second, it wasn't an acceptance, it was a new bet. As of yet no one
has accepted any bet. However, only one went on and on about it. That
would be you, chicken man, be sure to add that to your column.

#2: You changed
the tennis bet to $5k thereby creating an escape clause.

I changed it from ZERO to $5K. That is the FACT. Just because you
were trying to set up a $10K bet is, once again, meaningless. That is
part of the truth I expect you to print.

But don't
just read this over and over again. You can read all about it in a
few weeks along with the entire gambling world!

Now the whining begins ... Another prediction come true. I guess
Robbie is a techno-weenie on top of everything else. Whatsa matter,
you didn't have your two year old grandkid around to help you out?
Let's see. You couldn't figure out how to use your hotels' internet
capability, you couldn't get to a public library, you couldn't ask
one of those hundreds of people you claimed you've helped to let you
borrow their computer and it appears GT doesn't have any computers in
LV you could use. This is classic. A full 48 hours you had to figure
this out and you couldn't do it. ROTFLMAO. Make sure to add that to
your column. You wouldn't want to print anything but the TRUTH.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@> wrote:

#127

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@>
wrote:
>
>
> > Not a bit. You see I plan on selling the house and buying a
> townhouse in MN also. No need for that much space. Some day

you'll

> catch on.
>
> Why don't you just come out and say it? You're losing at such a
clip
> that you WILL move full time to LV because first off, you'll sell
> your house and have some more gambling money in your pocket

That would be a lie. Unlike you, I tell the truth.

You're a male version of the Queen. It's like walking down memory
lane and hearing the same BS all over again. And the best part? I'm
always right-on when it comes to compulsive vp players. How could
anyone NOT be?

Now the bet. All your nervous words and all that dancing around the
edges won't do a thing to help you now dipstick. You had your chance
many times over to face me or look stupid and insecure, and you chose
stupid. You get what you ask for and are geeky enough to want it all.
You have at least 4 hours to read my post and you chose to read it as
soon as I wrote it and make believe you saw it after I left. Typical
yellow chicken. Typical whiner. Me, work with computers on a trip to
play for profit and enjoy my time teaching others? HAHA! I'm no weeny
nerd like you.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@...> wrote:

> --- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@> wrote:

#128

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@...>
wrote:

>
> --- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@>
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@>

wrote:

> >
> > > Not a bit. You see I plan on selling the house and buying a
> > townhouse in MN also. No need for that much space. Some day
you'll
> > catch on.
> >
> > Why don't you just come out and say it? You're losing at such a
> clip
> > that you WILL move full time to LV because first off, you'll

sell

> > your house and have some more gambling money in your pocket
>
> That would be a lie. Unlike you, I tell the truth.

You're a male version of the Queen. It's like walking down memory
lane and hearing the same BS all over again. And the best part? I'm
always right-on when it comes to compulsive vp players. How could
anyone NOT be?

Easy. When they are a habitual liar and they feel they must protect
their ego. You lost as an APer and you can't accept the fact that
others can win. By the way, did I tell you I used some of my winnings
this year to pay off the loan on my townhome? Yep, as unhappy as it
makes little Robbie, that is another truth he will have to live with.

Now the bet. All your nervous words and all that dancing around the
edges won't do a thing to help you now dipstick. You had your

chance

many times over to face me or look stupid and insecure, and you

chose

stupid. You get what you ask for and are geeky enough to want it

all.

You have at least 4 hours to read my post and you chose to read it

as

soon as I wrote it and make believe you saw it after I left.

The next morning, actually. But it didn't matter anyway did it? You
didn't accept the bet. All you had to do is say "OK". The bet would
have been on. Instead you chickened out. Facts, little Robbie. I
love 'em.

Typical
yellow chicken. Typical whiner. Me, work with computers on a trip

to

play for profit and enjoy my time teaching others? HAHA! I'm no

weeny

nerd like you.

Sorry, bonehead, but it is not nerds that are CONNECTED these days.
You're about 10 years out-of-date. It's pretty much anyone who wants
to be. From warehouse jocks to salesmen. It's the IN thing these
days. Of course, we all know where that puts Robbie, the techno-
weenie. OUT. If you need help, I can provide it for you. At my
standard rate.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@> wrote:

#129

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@...>
wrote:

>
> --- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@>
> wrote:
> >
> > Too many words little dicky means you're making it all up as

you

go!
>
> Just the facts. I expected you'd cringe a little.
>
> > Read my column in a few weeks to see how you escaped yet

another

> one with me--starting with the radio show 'moment of proof'. It's
gonna be a GAS!
>
> No problem. Just print the truth and I'll sit back and have a

good

> laugh. What? You mean Robbie would bend the truth? Say it isn't

so!

> This is such a good laugh.
>
> I sure hope I don't need to waste any time talking to the GT
> publisher about accurate reporting.

I understand how weak-kneed you're getting over what's coming, and

I

don't blame you one bit.

I'm sure that's what you think in your fantasies. The fact is your
little GT article is meaningless. I've never even picked up a copy of
GT and I have a suspicion that those who do read it skip over one
very idiotic column. YOURS.

Truth has a way of doing that to cowardly
liars who shake in their shoes when it comes time to back-up the
nonsense they say to impress themselves.

Then you must be shaking.

PS. The old saying is "shake in their boots".

>
> >
> > Now onto more important things. Early Thursday morning I played

3

> > sessions: RTT, 5-Play (both had $500 win goals) and single-play
> > ($2500 win goal). BTW little dicky, if you get too envious here
> > simply stop reading. You can read about it in it's irritating
> > entirety shortly in Gaming Today. +$520, +505, & +$14,140.

Total

> > +$15,165 (less the $500 I lost by staying the weekend for other
> > reasons). So how about doing some more simulations for me?
>
> What would you like? I've already shown that winning is possible.
> Talk to me again after another 100 sessions.

I'll probably play 30 sessions this year, and I will never play

again

upon reaching my $1million win goal. But tell me something. I

played

every game at the Venetian and of course they were all on negative

EV

machines. So what? Next time I'll probably win again on the same

type

machines. Simple individual short-term sessions. There's no long-

term

involved here. One visit at a time and one win at a time. There's

no

connecting of the dots and I won't be starting over at the $10
machines. I know I'm feeling overly confident right now because I
didn't even need the kicker to win. But that's the purpose of my
stopping play when I reach a goal--no cockiness and no greed. Why
don't you get that?

Because it has nothing to do with reality. You had a chance a few
months back to accept Cognos' bet on playing negative machines and
you backed down on that. It also required a witness and you wouldn't
go for it. I think that pretty much tells us everything we need to
know.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@> wrote:

#130

All the making-believe in the world won't save you from being
embarrassed by the truth. You see, your type pathological liar who
also coerces his wife into living one, always get stung by what comes
around. You should have stepped up to the plate like a man with me
instead of weaseling out of it through all your predicted loopholes.
NO MERCY! Just like when us cool guys spanked the geeks in high
school! This is more fun than watching you and your controlled wife
argue at the machines!!

Geeks = 24/7 computer use (so how'd you slip up the other night?).
Addicts = 24/7 video poker 'on-the-mind'. A geek-addict? Dicky the
denyer of course!

> > >
> > > > Not a bit. You see I plan on selling the house and buying a
> > > townhouse in MN also. No need for that much space. Some day
> you'll
> > > catch on.
> > >
> > > Why don't you just come out and say it? You're losing at such

a

> > clip
> > > that you WILL move full time to LV because first off, you'll
sell
> > > your house and have some more gambling money in your pocket
> >
> > That would be a lie. Unlike you, I tell the truth.
>
> You're a male version of the Queen. It's like walking down memory
> lane and hearing the same BS all over again. And the best part?

I'm

> always right-on when it comes to compulsive vp players. How could
> anyone NOT be?

Easy. When they are a habitual liar and they feel they must protect
their ego. You lost as an APer and you can't accept the fact that
others can win. By the way, did I tell you I used some of my

winnings

this year to pay off the loan on my townhome? Yep, as unhappy as it
makes little Robbie, that is another truth he will have to live

with.

>
> Now the bet. All your nervous words and all that dancing around

the

> edges won't do a thing to help you now dipstick. You had your
chance
> many times over to face me or look stupid and insecure, and you
chose
> stupid. You get what you ask for and are geeky enough to want it
all.
> You have at least 4 hours to read my post and you chose to read

it

as
> soon as I wrote it and make believe you saw it after I left.

The next morning, actually. But it didn't matter anyway did it? You
didn't accept the bet. All you had to do is say "OK". The bet would
have been on. Instead you chickened out. Facts, little Robbie. I
love 'em.

> Typical
> yellow chicken. Typical whiner. Me, work with computers on a

trip

to
> play for profit and enjoy my time teaching others? HAHA! I'm no
weeny
> nerd like you.

Sorry, bonehead, but it is not nerds that are CONNECTED these days.
You're about 10 years out-of-date. It's pretty much anyone who

wants

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@...> wrote:

to be. From warehouse jocks to salesmen. It's the IN thing these
days. Of course, we all know where that puts Robbie, the techno-
weenie. OUT. If you need help, I can provide it for you. At my
standard rate.

#131

PS. The old saying is "shake in their boots".

"Old" is right. I set the pace here, remember?

Because it has nothing to do with reality. You had a chance a few
months back to accept Cognos' bet on playing negative machines and
you backed down on that. It also required a witness and you wouldn't
go for it. I think that pretty much tells us everything we need to
know.

Translation: You're more than envious, so you're on tilt with my
session outcome and it hurts you like a wounded pussy cat. BTW--You
were invited several weeks ago to meet me at 6am at the Venetian
Thursday to witness my play. You never accepted. What happened?? Let me
guess--You're TERRIFIED of meeting me. Could it be that video poker
belly?? HAHAHAHA!!

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@...> wrote:

#132

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@...>
wrote:

All the making-believe in the world won't save you from being
embarrassed by the truth.

I've never been embarrassed by the truth.

You see, your type pathological liar who
also coerces his wife into living one, always get stung by what

comes

around.

Not.

You should have stepped up to the plate like a man with me
instead of weaseling out of it through all your predicted

loopholes.

I did, you chickened out. All you had to do is say OK. That's all,
instead you shined up that yellow streak on your back and ran away.
The bet is still available if you ever grow a set. $10K. Remember to
add that to your article ... we wouldn't want you lie. LMAO.

Geeks = 24/7 computer use (so how'd you slip up the other night?).
Addicts = 24/7 video poker 'on-the-mind'. A geek-addict? Dicky the
denyer of course!

Robbie, the techno-weenie, can't figure out how to leave his house
and get online. You are as pathetic at todays' technology as you are
at everyting else. I loved the review of your book on VPfree. It
pretty much stated all that needs to be stated about Rob Singer.
Nothing of interest.

#133

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@...>
wrote:

>
> PS. The old saying is "shake in their boots".

"Old" is right. I set the pace here, remember?

That's right ... Mr. techno-weenie sets a blistering pace ...
backwards. Maybe, if you really try, you'll be able to keep up with
Fred Flintstone.

>
> Because it has nothing to do with reality. You had a chance a few
> months back to accept Cognos' bet on playing negative machines

and

> you backed down on that. It also required a witness and you

wouldn't

> go for it. I think that pretty much tells us everything we need

to

> know.

Translation: You're more than envious, so you're on tilt with my
session outcome and it hurts you like a wounded pussy cat.

Yah, I sure wish I was as backwards as Robbie. LMAO. Maybe a little
more time with that 2 yr old will bring you up to speed.

BTW--You
were invited several weeks ago to meet me at 6am at the Venetian
Thursday to witness my play. You never accepted. What happened??

Yawn. Why would I ever get up early to watch you play?

Let me
guess--You're TERRIFIED of meeting me. Could it be that video poker
belly?? HAHAHAHA!!

Hmmmm. You had the chance to see me on the courts and on the lanes
and you backed down. I think that pretty much says who's afraid of
meeting who. Come on, Robbie, admit it. You're "terrified" of meeting
me in person. All the monkey boy bravado you can muster doesn't hide
that obvious fact.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@> wrote:

#134

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@>
wrote:
>
> All the making-believe in the world won't save you from being
> embarrassed by the truth.

I've never been embarrassed by the truth.

You will this time.

> You see, your type pathological liar who
> also coerces his wife into living one, always get stung by what
comes around.

Not.

Are.

> You should have stepped up to the plate like a man with me
> instead of weaseling out of it through all your predicted
loopholes.

I did, you chickened out. All you had to do is say OK. That's all,
instead you shined up that yellow streak on your back and ran away.
The bet is still available if you ever grow a set. $10K.

That's $20k if you know how to add. $5k for the docs on the radio
show; $10k for the tennis; and $5k for the sissy match at the bowling
joint. You're problem is all you can do is loophole the thing since
you don't have the money. Just say it and you'll be spared that part
of your dignity.

> Geeks = 24/7 computer use (so how'd you slip up the other

night?).

> Addicts = 24/7 video poker 'on-the-mind'. A geek-addict? Dicky

the

> denyer of course!

Robbie, the techno-weenie, can't figure out how to leave his house
and get online. You are as pathetic at todays' technology as you

are

at everyting else. I loved the review of your book on VPfree. It
pretty much stated all that needs to be stated about Rob Singer.
Nothing of interest.

You'd love anything the brain-washed fools say about me on vpFREE. I
do too, because two days later most of these kooks are begging me to
help them. Just like you'll be doing down the road some..... You know
why you really ran those sims and so don't I. You're failing at that
addict play the Queen talked you into playing as an 'APer' so you're
doing your exploring. They all start out on the path of truth in one
way or another. That happens to be yours.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@...> wrote:

#135

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@>
wrote:
>
> >
> > PS. The old saying is "shake in their boots".
>
> "Old" is right. I set the pace here, remember?

That's right ... Mr. techno-weenie sets a blistering pace ...
backwards. Maybe, if you really try, you'll be able to keep up with
Fred Flintstone.

Who's Fred Flintstone??
  

> Translation: You're more than envious, so you're on tilt with my
> session outcome and it hurts you like a wounded pussy cat.

Yah, I sure wish I was as backwards as Robbie. LMAO. Maybe a little
more time with that 2 yr old will bring you up to speed.

Sorry you're so upset at how much I just won. I'll bet when your
addict wife looked over your shoulder and saw that she put the steps
in motion on how and when to contact me about how she can stop her
losing with a loser. I wouldn't be surprised to see the old hag leave
you for just about anything. Who would little dicky control then? His
weeny??

> BTW--You
> were invited several weeks ago to meet me at 6am at the Venetian
> Thursday to witness my play. You never accepted. What happened??

Yawn. Why would I ever get up early to watch you play?

On one hand you moan about my never wanting to be witnessed, and on
the other you ask yourself a make-believe question about the
opportunity to do just that. See why you're a wide open book on
hypocracy and pathological problems?

> Let me
> guess--You're TERRIFIED of meeting me. Could it be that video

poker

> belly?? HAHAHAHA!!

Hmmmm. You had the chance to see me on the courts and on the lanes
and you backed down. I think that pretty much says who's afraid of
meeting who. Come on, Robbie, admit it. You're "terrified" of

meeting me in person. All the monkey boy bravado you can muster
doesn't hide that obvious fact.

Whoops! You goofed again little dicky. I invited you to meet me at a
radio station. You weaseled out while appearing frightened to be
seen. You changed every bet just enough so as not to REALLY have to
face me. Now I'll give you yet another shot at showing off that video
poker belly that grows every day from sitting like a compulsive
addict at the vp machines: March 3rd, at the Venetian, 6pm in the
Gold lounge behind the high limit area. What loophole will you
utilize this time, chubby???! Let me guess: Nerds break out in hives
when in public places that require other-than-video poker play.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@...> wrote:

> --- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@> wrote:

#136

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@...>
wrote:

>
> --- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@>
> wrote:
> >
> > All the making-believe in the world won't save you from being
> > embarrassed by the truth.
>
> I've never been embarrassed by the truth.

You will this time.

I doubt it very much and most certainly not by the truth.

>
> > You should have stepped up to the plate like a man with me
> > instead of weaseling out of it through all your predicted
> loopholes.
>
> I did, you chickened out. All you had to do is say OK. That's

all,

> instead you shined up that yellow streak on your back and ran

away.

> The bet is still available if you ever grow a set. $10K.

That's $20k if you know how to add. $5k for the docs on the radio
show;

Nope, never took that bet, moron. I've already stated that any docs
can be forged, I'd never take any bet that is easily manipulated.

$10k for the tennis;

$5K if your man enough to take me on back to back with bowling.

and $5k for the sissy match at the bowling

That's right. Now accept my terms or look like a chicken. Your choice.

joint. You're problem is all you can do is loophole the thing since
you don't have the money. Just say it and you'll be spared that

part

of your dignity.

It's so obvious you're simply trying to back out of a man-to-man bet
for $10K (your choice of amounts). I'm beginning to think you don't
even have $10K to bet. I'm beginning to think you lied about winning
this weekend. In fact, it's looking VERY obvious that you never
intended to bet anything. You are such a loser.

>
> > Geeks = 24/7 computer use (so how'd you slip up the other
night?).
> > Addicts = 24/7 video poker 'on-the-mind'. A geek-addict? Dicky
the
> > denyer of course!
>
> Robbie, the techno-weenie, can't figure out how to leave his

house

> and get online. You are as pathetic at todays' technology as you
are
> at everyting else. I loved the review of your book on VPfree. It
> pretty much stated all that needs to be stated about Rob Singer.
> Nothing of interest.

You'd love anything the brain-washed fools say about me on vpFREE.

Wrong again. Nothing was said on VPfree. Only a pointer was given to
a website where the person made an honest attempt to review your
book. That's what makes it so good. They read it and basically said
it was worthless.

I
do too, because two days later most of these kooks are begging me

to

help them.

Righto, t-w.

Just like you'll be doing down the road some.....

Don't hold your breath.

You know
why you really ran those sims and so don't I.

Couldn't have said it better myself.

You're failing at that
addict play the Queen talked you into playing as an 'APer' so

you're

doing your exploring. They all start out on the path of truth in

one

way or another. That happens to be yours.

I'm always open to new ideas. I analyze the idea and determine what
works for me. That's how I became a successful APer. That's also why
I looked into a progression to see if there was any part of it that
could be successfully applied to positive games. So far, I haven't
come across anything of merit. While it clearly increases the number
of session wins, it does this by increasing bankroll risk. Not
interesting to me. I also found out is that your approach is a very
poor one indeed. Using BP like you do buys nothing. You'd do better
using JOB or staying with all high variance games.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@> wrote:

#137

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@...>
wrote:

>
> --- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@>
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@>

wrote:

> > >
> > > PS. The old saying is "shake in their boots".
> >
> > "Old" is right. I set the pace here, remember?
>
> That's right ... Mr. techno-weenie sets a blistering pace ...
> backwards. Maybe, if you really try, you'll be able to keep up

with

> Fred Flintstone.

Who's Fred Flintstone??

Someone who possesses your technical abilities. LMAO. Tell us all
again how you grew up in the USA. Are you for real?

> > Translation: You're more than envious, so you're on tilt with

my

> > session outcome and it hurts you like a wounded pussy cat.
>
> Yah, I sure wish I was as backwards as Robbie. LMAO. Maybe a

little

> more time with that 2 yr old will bring you up to speed.

Sorry you're so upset at how much I just won.

Sure you did. You don't really think anyone believes you, do you?

I'll bet when your
addict wife looked over your shoulder and saw that she put the

steps

in motion on how and when to contact me about how she can stop her
losing with a loser. I wouldn't be surprised to see the old hag

leave

you for just about anything. Who would little dicky control then?

His

weeny??

How much would you like to bet? I don't bother my wife with petty
things like you. I knew you'd back down. You've done it before and
you're doing it again.

> > BTW--You
> > were invited several weeks ago to meet me at 6am at the

Venetian

> > Thursday to witness my play. You never accepted. What

happened??

>
> Yawn. Why would I ever get up early to watch you play?

On one hand you moan about my never wanting to be witnessed, and on
the other you ask yourself a make-believe question about the
opportunity to do just that. See why you're a wide open book on
hypocracy and pathological problems?

I never said anything about witnessing. I STILL don't give a hoot
about you. I simply pointed out the FACT that you turned down a bet
that required a witness. That tells it all.

>
> > Let me
> > guess--You're TERRIFIED of meeting me. Could it be that video
poker
> > belly?? HAHAHAHA!!
>
>
> Hmmmm. You had the chance to see me on the courts and on the

lanes

> and you backed down. I think that pretty much says who's afraid

of

> meeting who. Come on, Robbie, admit it. You're "terrified" of
meeting me in person. All the monkey boy bravado you can muster
doesn't hide that obvious fact.

Whoops! You goofed again little dicky. I invited you to meet me at

a

radio station.

Of which I have no interest. Didn't I already explain that to you?
Are you demented? A small audience and a small amount of time that
would accomplish nothing. Now, the bowling/tennis matches would
accomplish something much greater. It would determine if you have the
balls to back up your words. Wellllllll ???

You weaseled out while appearing frightened to be
seen.

ROTFLMAO. On a radio show? Interesting technology.

You changed every bet just enough so as not to REALLY have to
face me.

Nope. I've never changed a single thing. I have offered you a fair
bet. You are chicken to accept it. That is the fact.

Now I'll give you yet another shot at showing off that video
poker belly that grows every day from sitting like a compulsive
addict at the vp machines: March 3rd, at the Venetian, 6pm in the
Gold lounge behind the high limit area.

You really think I would go out of my way to see you? You're funny.
Accept the bet if you want or chicken out. That's your choice. You've
got 3 weeks to practice up and determine if you can stand up to a
REAL man. In the meantime I'll just cozy up to my VP machines and
laugh everytime I think about you cowering at home.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@> wrote:

#138

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@>
wrote:
>
> >
> > --- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > All the making-believe in the world won't save you from being
> > > embarrassed by the truth.
> >
> > I've never been embarrassed by the truth.
>
> You will this time.

I doubt it very much and most certainly not by the truth.

You lose here all the time, so one wuld expect you'd have learned to
handle it by now instead of trying to shake it all off as you do. The
truth will set you free!

> > > You should have stepped up to the plate like a man with me
> > > instead of weaseling out of it through all your predicted
> > loopholes.
> >
> > I did, you chickened out. All you had to do is say OK. That's
all,
> > instead you shined up that yellow streak on your back and ran
away.
> > The bet is still available if you ever grow a set. $10K.
>
> That's $20k if you know how to add. $5k for the docs on the radio
> show;

Nope, never took that bet, moron. I've already stated that any docs
can be forged, I'd never take any bet that is easily manipulated.

Just the point--you run away from me rather than face your fate. Docs
forged? Perhaps you ignored my statement that I'd also accompany you
to whatever agency or institution that would verify the authenticity
of my passport and diplomas, in order to 'fill in' your fantasy
loophole??

> $10k for the tennis;

$5K if your man enough to take me on back to back with bowling.

More loopholes of escape. Wouldn't it be just as easy to accept the
$10k bet? In not doing so, you either look cheap, broke, afraid,
worried, or everything all together. The difference is peanuts.
Consult with Congo and maybe that fool will come to his senses and
help you out some.

> and $5k for the sissy match at the bowling

That's right. Now accept my terms or look like a chicken. Your

choice.

No problem. A $20k package and you're the determining factor. I'm
already in. You're stuck in a loophole. Time to get out and be a man
for a change!

> joint. You're problem is all you can do is loophole the thing

since

> you don't have the money. Just say it and you'll be spared that
part
> of your dignity.

It's so obvious you're simply trying to back out of a man-to-man

bet

for $10K (your choice of amounts). I'm beginning to think you don't
even have $10K to bet. I'm beginning to think you lied about

winning

this weekend. In fact, it's looking VERY obvious that you never
intended to bet anything. You are such a loser.

Jibber-jabber in the face of being labeled a make-believe artist.
It's $20k, and if you keep whining about only betting $10k then your
fictitious story above doesn't quite fit....get it yet? Stop the
crying and be a man instead of the same ol' nerd for a change!!

> You'd love anything the brain-washed fools say about me on

vpFREE.

Wrong again. Nothing was said on VPfree. Only a pointer was given

to

a website where the person made an honest attempt to review your
book. That's what makes it so good. They read it and basically said
it was worthless.

Oh, a pointer to what one loser said. That explains your philosophy
in a nutshell. Selective criticism. Next, go on over to GT or GBC
tomorrow (if you can possibly fit it in between local dump casino
visits) and ask their opinions. Then lets see how you handle that
here.

> I
> do too, because two days later most of these kooks are begging me
to
> help them.

Righto, t-w.

> Just like you'll be doing down the road some.....

Don't hold your breath.

> You know
> why you really ran those sims and so don't I.

Couldn't have said it better myself.

> You're failing at that
> addict play the Queen talked you into playing as an 'APer' so
you're
> doing your exploring. They all start out on the path of truth in
one
> way or another. That happens to be yours.

I'm always open to new ideas. I analyze the idea and determine what
works for me. That's how I became a successful APer. That's also

why

I looked into a progression to see if there was any part of it that
could be successfully applied to positive games. So far, I haven't
come across anything of merit. While it clearly increases the

number

of session wins, it does this by increasing bankroll risk. Not
interesting to me. I also found out is that your approach is a very
poor one indeed. Using BP like you do buys nothing. You'd do better
using JOB or staying with all high variance games.

Just like every critic, you fear the bankroll risk. That's why you
hide at the 25c machines and make believe you'll die a 1% winner.
That's gotta be REALLY interesting. Bankroll risk only terrifies
those who aren't prepared. People who make a lot of money playing
video poker like I do don't use the grocery money to play with like
you do.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@...> wrote:

> --- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@> wrote:

#139

> > That's right ... Mr. techno-weenie sets a blistering pace ...
> > backwards. Maybe, if you really try, you'll be able to keep up
with
> > Fred Flintstone.
>
> Who's Fred Flintstone??

Someone who possesses your technical abilities. LMAO. Tell us all
again how you grew up in the USA. Are you for real?

I thought it was a child's vitamin brand.

>
> > > Translation: You're more than envious, so you're on tilt with
my
> > > session outcome and it hurts you like a wounded pussy cat.
> >
> > Yah, I sure wish I was as backwards as Robbie. LMAO. Maybe a
little
> > more time with that 2 yr old will bring you up to speed.
>
> Sorry you're so upset at how much I just won.

Sure you did. You don't really think anyone believes you, do you?

One thing's for certain: YOU do, which is also why you're so
irritated by it.

> I'll bet when your
> addict wife looked over your shoulder and saw that she put the
steps
> in motion on how and when to contact me about how she can stop

her

> losing with a loser. I wouldn't be surprised to see the old hag
leave
> you for just about anything. Who would little dicky control then?
His
> weeny??

How much would you like to bet? I don't bother my wife with petty
things like you. I knew you'd back down. You've done it before and
you're doing it again.

I'm on your mind 24/7, and I'm the only thing you two addicts have in
common other than the machines. The reason I'm an obsession with you
is because I ridicule you to the point of actually telling you what
your geeky little life's been like while you've been trying to hide
from it all. I'm your nightmare come true little dicky. Don't ever
forget that!

> > > BTW--You
> > > were invited several weeks ago to meet me at 6am at the
Venetian
> > > Thursday to witness my play. You never accepted. What
happened??
> >
> > Yawn. Why would I ever get up early to watch you play?
>
> On one hand you moan about my never wanting to be witnessed, and

on

> the other you ask yourself a make-believe question about the
> opportunity to do just that. See why you're a wide open book on
> hypocracy and pathological problems?

I never said anything about witnessing. I STILL don't give a hoot
about you. I simply pointed out the FACT that you turned down a bet
that required a witness. That tells it all.

I 'turned down a bet that required a witness' yet you were invited
bet-free to watch me play last week, and what tells it all? You kind
of got'cher tongue in a twister there, little dicky.

> >
> > > Let me
> > > guess--You're TERRIFIED of meeting me. Could it be that video
> poker
> > > belly?? HAHAHAHA!!
> >
> >
> > Hmmmm. You had the chance to see me on the courts and on the
lanes
> > and you backed down. I think that pretty much says who's afraid
of
> > meeting who. Come on, Robbie, admit it. You're "terrified" of
> meeting me in person. All the monkey boy bravado you can muster
> doesn't hide that obvious fact.
>
> Whoops! You goofed again little dicky. I invited you to meet me

at

a
> radio station.

Of which I have no interest. Didn't I already explain that to you?

Let's see....Not afraid to meet me, but has 'no interest' in meeting
me. Do you ever talk straight?

> Are you demented? A small audience and a small amount of time that

would accomplish nothing.

....except meeting the man who drives you nuts! The one whom you say
doesn't want to meet YOU! HAHAHA!!

Now, the bowling/tennis matches would

accomplish something much greater. It would determine if you have

the

balls to back up your words. Wellllllll ???

> You weaseled out while appearing frightened to be
> seen.

ROTFLMAO. On a radio show? Interesting technology.

> You changed every bet just enough so as not to REALLY have to
> face me.

Nope. I've never changed a single thing. I have offered you a fair
bet. You are chicken to accept it. That is the fact.

> Now I'll give you yet another shot at showing off that video
> poker belly that grows every day from sitting like a compulsive
> addict at the vp machines: March 3rd, at the Venetian, 6pm in the
> Gold lounge behind the high limit area.

You really think I would go out of my way to see you?

Lat's see.....your twisted in knots once again, right? You say "I'm
afraid of meeting with you" yet you don't seem to want to meet
anywhere! And when I accept the bowling & tennis for just a few
dollars more, you use 'just a few dollars more' as an escape thru
your usual maze of loopholes. Now do you get why us cool guys made
constant fun of and whacked around the geeks?

You're funny.

Accept the bet if you want or chicken out. That's your choice.

You've

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@...> wrote:

got 3 weeks to practice up and determine if you can stand up to a
REAL man. In the meantime I'll just cozy up to my VP machines and
laugh everytime I think about you cowering at home.

#140

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@...>
wrote:

> > > > All the making-believe in the world won't save you from

being

> > > > embarrassed by the truth.
> > >
> > > I've never been embarrassed by the truth.
> >
> > You will this time.
>
> I doubt it very much and most certainly not by the truth.

You lose here all the time, so one wuld expect you'd have learned

to

handle it by now instead of trying to shake it all off as you do.

The

truth will set you free!

I'm already free. Free to make you look like an impotent fraud. Free
to prove you've lied 100s of times. Free to challenge you to a bet
you'll never accept out of fear. Ahhhhhhhhhh, it's good to be free.

>
> > $10k for the tennis;
>
> $5K if your man enough to take me on back to back with bowling.

More loopholes of escape. Wouldn't it be just as easy to accept the
$10k bet?

It is a $10K bet. Let me explain it to you ... 5+5 = 10. If you need
more help check with your grandkids.

In not doing so, you either look cheap, broke, afraid,
worried, or everything all together. The difference is peanuts.

If it were peanuts to you, you would have accepted the challenge.
Instead, you attempt to weasel out. This is so funny. Poor Robbie
scambles and babbles but when all is said and done, he backs out.

>
> > and $5k for the sissy match at the bowling
>
> That's right. Now accept my terms or look like a chicken. Your
choice.

No problem. A $20k package and you're the determining factor. I'm
already in. You're stuck in a loophole. Time to get out and be a

man

for a change!

No. You're the one stuck. YOU ORIGINALLY came up with the $10K
number. I often said that everytime anyone takes one of your bets YOU
just come back and raise the ante. You've never stuck with a bet yet.
Now, you're backed into a corner. YOU set the amount. If YOU don't
stick with it then YOU have proved to everyone that YOU are a fraud.

>
> > joint. You're problem is all you can do is loophole the thing
since
> > you don't have the money. Just say it and you'll be spared that
> part
> > of your dignity.
>
> It's so obvious you're simply trying to back out of a man-to-man
bet
> for $10K (your choice of amounts). I'm beginning to think you

don't

> even have $10K to bet. I'm beginning to think you lied about
winning
> this weekend. In fact, it's looking VERY obvious that you never
> intended to bet anything. You are such a loser.

Jibber-jabber in the face of being labeled a make-believe artist.
It's $20k, and if you keep whining about only betting $10k then

your

fictitious story above doesn't quite fit....get it yet? Stop the
crying and be a man instead of the same ol' nerd for a change!!

I tell you what. AFTER the $10K bowling/tennis match we can set up
$20K matches. No more excuses. YOU set the original amount of $10K.
Either stick with it or run away like a slimy coward. I really don't
care.

> > You'd love anything the brain-washed fools say about me on
vpFREE.
>
> Wrong again. Nothing was said on VPfree. Only a pointer was given
to
> a website where the person made an honest attempt to review your
> book. That's what makes it so good. They read it and basically

said

> it was worthless.

Oh, a pointer to what one loser said. That explains your philosophy
in a nutshell. Selective criticism. Next, go on over to GT or GBC
tomorrow (if you can possibly fit it in between local dump casino
visits) and ask their opinions. Then lets see how you handle that
here.

Give me a name and an address. While I'm there I can see if they have
internet access ... you know, the thing you couldn't handle while you
were in LV. If they do, I can help you out next time or you can
always ask your grandkids.