It seems some of my posts get some of the regulars here irritated.
I'm sorry. It was not my intention to cause any of that. I guess I
have views that differ from those of most.
First of all, let me say I do read a lot of these messages, I own
WinPoker and Frugal, I read other VP message boards and it is all
very educational. I even enjoy some of the messages from people that
later use strong language against me. I don't take any of that
personally. I'm not here to insult or fight anyone, but to get good
tips on VP.
I believe there are different gambling styles. Before I played Video
Poker, I used to play slots, and sometimes had some good hits. I
started enjoying Video Poker once I realized I could generally play
longer on VP machines than in slots, with the same amount of money.
So I learned strategies, paytables, and all that. Now I find it fun.
I respect the people that do it full time and are dedicated to it,
the big names, as well as the aficionados.
Now, there is, let us call it, the "orthodox" video poker gambling
style. The prescription here is to go to the casino that offers FPDW
(usually in quarters, they have discontinued the higher denomination
of these machines, it seems) or KBJW or other machines that with the
other perks become a positive situation. Then you play a lot, really
a lot. The long term is better approached after a million hands or
more. On this system, some people end up making more money than
others but, in the long term, it is believed all should profit. This
system is fine. I don't have a gripe with it. I even find it fun to
see all the different possible holds with penalty cards, and see how
I can improve my chances of winning at some games an extra penny a
century. The people that practice this style tend to be regulars, and
play VP almost exclusively.
There is, let us call it, the "slot" video poker gambling style. You
treat the video poker machine as just another slot machine. Ah! But
it is a slot machine of which you know a lot. Its theoretical
payback, the system that will make you win more money in the long
term, etc. The people that practice this style -human beings that
like to gamble, let me stress- do not study "positive situations"
carefully, but just pay tables, strategy, general facts about
machines. The people that use this strategy tend to be relatively
infrequent visitors of casinos, maybe on a few trips a year, and tend
to play other games too, games like blackjack, craps and, why not?,
even slots.
For a while lately I thought I was on the wrong message board. I
thought this board was just for "orthodox" players. Then I realized
there are more styles than the two I mentioned, and I'm intrigued
about that. A very famous Video Poker player -let me not mention his
name because that might be another headache for me- is a very able
analyst of the VP games. He likes to play the best games and the most
accurate strategy; but he made a lot of money venturing into a $100
VP machine. A Royal worth almost half a million dollars. Now, was
this "orthodox" playing? Was this the best situation? Was this
sensible bankroll management? No. Was it "slot" style playing? Well,
this person is very good and very serious about his play.
I can't afford to go to a $100 machine, but I will go to one on an
evening in a casino if I am having that unusual experience some
gamblers have had: an incredible streak of good luck.
I respect the VP professionals, but I don't want to spend hours
toiling. I think slot players can be fun, but I can't afford to take
the huge losses they often take. I want to explore the middle of the
road, something in between the "orthodox" style and the "slot"
style.
So, what do you think? Should I give up on my dream of making half a
million at VP?
I have my umbrella open, and my hard hat on. Start banging.
E.
