vpFREE2 Forums

(Fwd) Re: [vpFREE] Re: XVP: Buy stocks now and get money to pl

------- Forwarded message follows -------

···

To: vpFREE@yahoogroups.com
BCC to:
From: "pesach kremen" <royalflush2222@hotmail.com>
Date sent: Sat, 06 Nov 2004 00:46:03 -0800
Subject: Re: [vpFREE] Re: XVP: Buy stocks now and get money to play VP!

There is an interesting item here, and this should apply regardless of
party affiliation. If you are in debt, you don't cut your income until
the debt is retired. George W Bush had the chance to be a big hero and
let the federal debt be retired during his adminsistration. Once that
happened, then he could cut taxes and both democrats and republicans
would give him support.

From: John Kelly <jwkelly@flash.net>
Reply-To: vpFREE@yahoogroups.com
To: vpFREE@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [vpFREE] Re: XVP: Buy stocks now and get money to play VP!
Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2004 16:42:25 -0800

Right. But, what I've always found ironic is that all the major
recessions/depressions of the last 150 years have occured while a
Republican is in the White House. I don't have an explanation for this,
I'm just pointing out that the "party of big business" hasn't been very
good at its primary goal.

On the other hand, the Democrats might be called the "anti-war" party,
but WWI, WWII, Korea, and Vietnam all occurred on their watch. So much
for the "party of peace".

All mirth aside, a concern: aren't the ceiling-raising federal budget
deficits going to force interest rates up? (They haven't yet, so maybe
I dozed off during something relevant in ECON 101). Can really fight
two wars at the same time, rebuild Iraq, and defend the homeland, all
without raising taxes? Don't the wheels come off at some point? Just
wondering.

John, who sees "W" in a chess match with the forces of evil, and
doesn't
  like our chances.

>
> As I'm sure you're aware, the ascension to the throne of a
> Democratic administration has always been viewed by Wall street as
> bad for business, and a Republican administration, as good. This is
> particularly true now in view of Bush and Kerry's strong differences
> in attitude toward taxation, capital gains tax, and business
> regulation in general.