vpFREE2 Forums

(Fwd) Highly-Desirable Progressives

#1

In a message dated 1/7/2005 9:24:02 A.M. Pacific Standard Time, dds6@cox.net
writes:

Well, since its not 20 or 30 minutes, what is the time frame are you
suggesting?

Actually it wasn't my posting about the time limit - I was appending my own
thoughts about health clubs. I wouldn't limit time unless it was a goodly
limit like four hours. All I would do is insist that when a seat became
available, someone from the list be seated, rather than a tag team match.

Karen

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

#2

In a message dated 1/7/2005 9:24:02 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,

dds6@c...

writes:

Well, since its not 20 or 30 minutes, what is the time frame are

you

suggesting?

Actually it wasn't my posting about the time limit - I was

appending my own

thoughts about health clubs. I wouldn't limit time unless it was

a goodly

limit like four hours. All I would do is insist that when a seat

became

available, someone from the list be seated, rather than a tag team

match.

Karen

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

IMO, merely requiring that the machine go to the "next in line",
without any limitation upon the duration of current occupant's play,
creates too much scope for "tag team" play. If A and C are team
members, but B is "next in line" for a machine, A and C can make it
clear, to B, that A will continue to play until B becomes tired of
waiting and leaves.

Enforcement of a definite time limit would forestall such tactics.

ยทยทยท

--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, krallison416@a... wrote: