In a message dated 9/23/2007 9:07:12 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
krallison416@aol.com writes:
That is not the basis on which they make their decisions - that's how we
make ours 
They decide on the basis of whether it is a an over 100% game
or
not without the progressive.
OK, got it, I think. At any rate, we should have to join an AP union in
order to be allowed to play. The rules would be don't look ostentatious [I don't
even know what that word means but it sounds cool and I hope I spelled it
right] It used to be the AP's at the Boulder Deuces progressive endured the
Karoake. Maybe the play got killed from all the bright orange airport grade ear
mufflers with speakers inserted and the vest pockets stuffed with plastic
laminated progressive strategy cards. The fact that we never smile or seem to be
having fun like the ploopies is a factor. If the casino wants to cut paytables
to save bucks all they have to do is look for us.
It's all over for me. Boulder was the straw that broke the camels back. It's
"Hold'em for me now and I'm waiting until the dealerless tables hit Vegas. A
resurgence in poker will sweep the nation and the world. A card room manager
told me privately that "tens of thousands of online players will swoop down
on Vegas. Bingo size card rooms will appear." I wonder why nobody else is
excited about this. Nothing in the card magazines at all. Video Poker will
supply me with unlimited free meals but not much else. Wait... maybe there is
something to the strategy of covering up my credit meter with a pack of
cigarettes.
Drain
************************************** See what's new at http://www.aol.com
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]