No you are right. I am just trying to say that there CAN be a balance betwwen the two. You just need to try to accomplish it.
···
----- Original Message -----
Subject: RE: [vpFREE] First One...
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 18:09:27
From: Chandler <chandler_re@comcast.net>
To: <vpFREE@yahoogroups.com>
You're right, you are not a gambler. You do it because you are either, A)
Having fun, or B) Playing at an advantage. In the best of all possible
worlds it is both.
Chandler
-----Original Message-----
From: vpFREE@yahoogroups. com [mailto: vpFREE@yahoogroups. com ]On Behalf Of
WOLVES
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2008 11:45 AM
To: vpfree@yahoogroups. com
Subject: FW: [vpFREE] First One...
I guess I am not a gambler so I will try to understand. After winning a
sports bet, getting dealt 4 of a kind AND a full house on a hundred play,
where is the rational to continue?
----- Original Message -----
Subject: [vpFREE] First One...
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 16:15:38
From: Jason Pawloski < jpawloski@gmail. com >
To: < vpFREE@yahoogroups. com >
I put 100 on the Celtics money line last night. After the game I
went in to
collect my $280 and decided to play some 100 play video. For the first time
in my life, I got a dealt 4 of a kind. I was playing all hands and betting
max. Pretty nice.
Literally like 10 hands later I got a dealt full house.
I ended up giving both of these wins back though.
I worked out the odds of getting a dealt 4 of a kind and only got every
4,165 games or so. This is surprising, assuming I did my math right.
Intuitively I would expect it to be further, to the order of 10,000 games or
so.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
------------ --------- --------- ------
vpFREE Links: http://members. cox.net/vpfree/ Links.htm
Yahoo! Groups Links