[Regarding the Silver Legacy no longer mailing bonus cash offers to
video poker players:]
"nightoftheiguana2000" <nightoftheiguana2000@...> wrote:
There's no reason for them to bring back the bonuses if you
continue to play without them.
We can be certain that Silver Legacy will decide whether or not bring
back bonuses based on somewhat rational criteria. Isn't it quite
possible that if their profits rise, they'll be happy with their no-
bonus policy, but if profits fall, they'll be unhappy and know they
need to do something different and perhaps try bringing bonus back?
If that's the case, shouldn't it be our goal to "punish" S-L for
their no bonus decision, by pushing their profits down, inducing them
to change their ways?
And if all this makes sense so far... then logic demands that
skillful players *should* continue to play at Silver Legacy's full
pay Deuces Wild and Joker Poker machines. The more that skilled
players play these machines, the worse it is for S-L's bottom line,
the worse they'll be "punished," and the more likely they'll be
incented to change their ways.
Once they bring the bonuses back, THEN we can reward them by playing
at their casino less.
Stuart (RandomStu)
http://home.comcast.net/~sresnick2/fungames.htm