missdeuces wrote:
I totally agree with you but unfortunately there are many players
out there that are on ly interested in what they can get for
themselves and ruin for all.
Classic economics, combined with a little game theory, suggests that
"play it 'til we kill it off" is a rational strategy, unfortunate as
it is.
The formation of a card carrying "players union" that would formulate
and enforce rules for prudent consumption of a strong play isn't in
the offing.
- H.
Is someone actually saying that it appears that Wynn management may
be applying a bit of
reasoanable logic here?
Wow! I better look out my window to see the pigs flying by. LOL
One of those pigs really pissed me off last week. He killed a great
play by slamming several different cards through a machine. I don't
want to get into the details, but I really want to strangle the guy.
If the clown only went 80% all out instead of 100%, he would have been
fine. But this is the nature of Vegas VP-if you don't burn it down,
someone else will.
I've had women offer to drop the panties for me in return for the
location of $1 FPDW games (neither is so not happening). There's at
least one left in Clark County. I may pop into Wynn and give a
courtesy play, but certainly not pound away like an idiot. I hear the
mail is ok.
There are two 99.96 Deuces paytables-the old "fake full pay", which I
forget right now, because it's an obsolete paytable, and the newer
15-11-4-4, which is available only on IGT multi-line machines.
For my money, I'd think they should put in all wild card games-99.92
Joker 2 pair, 99.97 Double Joker, 99.98 or 100.28 OEJ. The FPDW is
just too easy to play and too high a payout; slots should have
realized this.
--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "bornloser1537" <bornloser1537@y...> wrote:
It's just another version of the prisoner's dilemma ie. where the
collective maximum benefit is achieved only with 100% participation of
each individual and each individual believing that every other
individual will independently decide to participate.
The "Men from Target" are not a good subset wherein this is likely to
occur.
vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "Harry Porter" <harry.porter@v...> wrote:
missdeuces wrote:
> I totally agree with you but unfortunately there are many players
> out there that are on ly interested in what they can get for
> themselves and ruin for all.Classic economics, combined with a little game theory, suggests that
"play it 'til we kill it off" is a rational strategy, unfortunate as
it is.The formation of a card carrying "players union" that would formulate
and enforce rules for prudent consumption of a strong play isn't in
the offing.- H.