vpFREE2 Forums

Following Scot's footsteps; Fiesta Rancho's 5-play 5c progressive

#1

In a message dated 6/16/2003 9:54:33 PM Pacific Standard Time,
elti1040@yahoo.com writes:

BTW, speaking of that same Spinpoker, which dealt you
a base RF -- a few weeks ago, I made four of nine
RF's (from 4 to a RF) and got only $200 X 4 = $800.

I don't believe that four is a possible number. If the missing card is the
center card, you could get five (if the correct card hits in the middle row) or
two (if the correct card falls top or bottom). If the missing card is anywhere
else, starting with a RF4, you get three Royals.

This all assumes that SpinPoker has not undergone a fundamental change in the
paylines in the past couple of years, since I last played it.

Brian

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

#2

You're absolutely right. Three RF's was more like it.
I assumed automatically that it was four since I
collected more than $800. My original bet plus the
accumulated small wins was the main reason for the sum
being worth more than four RF's.

Elito

ยทยทยท

--- BJayGold@aol.com wrote:

In a message dated 6/16/2003 9:54:33 PM Pacific
Standard Time,
elti1040@yahoo.com writes:

>
> BTW, speaking of that same Spinpoker, which dealt
you
> a base RF -- a few weeks ago, I made four of
nine
> RF's (from 4 to a RF) and got only $200 X 4 =
$800.

I don't believe that four is a possible number. If
the missing card is the
center card, you could get five (if the correct card
hits in the middle row) or
two (if the correct card falls top or bottom). If
the missing card is anywhere
else, starting with a RF4, you get three Royals.

This all assumes that SpinPoker has not undergone a
fundamental change in the
paylines in the past couple of years, since I last
played it.

Brian

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
http://sbc.yahoo.com