BLwrote:
"I am referring to my feelings about "progressive" VP machines. I would think this would be something that any casino would want to use (exclusively?) In my view (maybe my view is distorted?), a progressive VP machine gives us all the best of both worlds. The casino does not have to install "super" pay tables and yet the player can experience a rising EV (at little or no cost to the casino?)"
···
----------------------
This is the section of your original response that got me thinking you were advocating negative games with progressives to make them positive over inherently positive games.
I apoligize if I mis-interpreted your statement.
Thanks-rob
--- On Tue, 5/12/09, bornloser1537 <bornloser1537@yahoo.com> wrote:
From: bornloser1537 <bornloser1537@yahoo.com>
Subject: [vpFREE] Re: Fiesta Rancho FPDW progressive MIA
To: vpFREE@yahoogroups.com
Date: Tuesday, May 12, 2009, 9:45 PM
--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, Rob Reid <rreid0859@...> wrote:
Someone originally postulated that players would be better off with negative expectation games with progressives to make them positive than inherently positive games.
Again, I find that to be a bad trade from a players perspective.
If you are referring to my comments, please be aware that I made no such postulation.
You should go back to see what was written. I don't believe that I said anything about replacing positive expectation games with negative expectation games with progressives.
I was opining that negative expectation games with a progressive pay table was better than what was currently available where I usually play.
...... bl
------------------------------------
vpFREE Links: http://members.cox.net/vpfree/Links.htm
Yahoo! Groups Links
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]