vpFREE2 Forums

Fiesta Rancho FPDW progressive MIA

#1

I think a trade of inherently positive game for one that is inherently negative but becomes positive with progressives is a bad trade.

It goes back to the underlying problem with progressives. You can't be in all the seats, all the time.

···

--- On Tue, 5/12/09, bornloser1537 <bornloser1537@yahoo.com> wrote:

From: bornloser1537 <bornloser1537@yahoo.com>
Subject: [vpFREE] Re: Fiesta Rancho FPDW progressive MIA
To: vpFREE@yahoogroups.com
Date: Tuesday, May 12, 2009, 4:26 PM

--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "bobbartop" <bobbartop@...> wrote:

... that particular bank had a progressive on top of an already positive base game ...

-Bob Bartop

Yes, I hear you about this specific one. But, my comments were meant to be more general. For me, the base pay table would not have to be "super", just "reasonable", leaving the progressive nature of the machine to drive up the EV, sometimes even to more "interesting" levels.

...... bl

------------------------------------

vpFREE Links: http://members.cox.net/vpfree/Links.htm

Yahoo! Groups Links

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

#2

Not to argue, since we are opining here. I (and it is my opinion) do not see the underlying problem. After all, we are "gambling".

And, you are never "required" to play. Certainly a seat must be available, but, other than that, one can come and go whenever one pleases.

..... bl

···

--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, Rob Reid <rreid0859@...> wrote:

It goes back to the underlying problem with progressives. You can't be in all the seats, all the time.

#3

I disagree. Progressives in any form are extremely popular with the gaming public the are not compatible with current casino "Loser's Only" policy. Casinos just can't stand the thought of even one player getting away a winner. If I owned a casino I'd bring back games like 8/5 jacks with a 2% meter and other fun games for players and winners overall for the house.

···

--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, Rob Reid <rreid0859@...> wrote:

I think a trade of inherently positive game for one that is inherently negative but becomes positive with progressives is a bad trade.
�
It goes back to the underlying problem with progressives.� You can't be in all the seats, all the time.�

--- On Tue, 5/12/09, bornloser1537 <bornloser1537@...> wrote:

From: bornloser1537 <bornloser1537@...>
Subject: [vpFREE] Re: Fiesta Rancho FPDW progressive MIA
To: vpFREE@yahoogroups.com
Date: Tuesday, May 12, 2009, 4:26 PM

--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "bobbartop" <bobbartop@> wrote:
>
> ... that particular bank had a progressive on top of an already positive base game ...
>
> -Bob Bartop

Yes, I hear you about this specific one.� But, my comments were meant to be more general.� For me, the base pay table would not have to be "super", just "reasonable", leaving the progressive nature of the machine to drive up the EV, sometimes even to more "interesting" levels.

...... bl

------------------------------------

vpFREE Links: http://members.cox.net/vpfree/Links.htm

Yahoo! Groups Links

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]