vpFREE2 Forums

Fair games poll

Private email to Administrator:

------- Forwarded message follows -------

Date sent: Mon, 18 Oct 2004 17:07:33 -0000

I mostly trust the vp in Las Vegas - especially the old IGT machines, but I
have never played in any "seedy" establishments not on the strip or downtown.
A high ranking casino employee told me that old IGT machines like FPDW are
often replaced because they are no longer made, and thus cannot be
maintained, not just because of pay tables. Casinos simply order new ones
often with different pay scheds. Is this true?

I no longer trust the VP in Atlantic City. I feel the triple play machines @
Bally's = .25 8/5 Bonus progs and $1 machines in the gold room do not play
the same since they were converted to TITO - also comps and CB are now less
since the connection card went national. The newer $1 9/6 progs seem better.

The Taj $1 9/6, and 8/6 bonus machines never played right to me.

9/6's @ the Borgatta seem correct.

···

To: vpFREE@Cox.net
Subject: Fair games poll

Private email to Administrator:
I no longer trust the VP in Atlantic City. I feel the triple play

machines @

Bally's = .25 8/5 Bonus progs and $1 machines in the gold room do

not play

the same since they were converted to TITO - also comps and CB are

now less

since the connection card went national. The newer $1 9/6 progs

seem better.

The Taj $1 9/6, and 8/6 bonus machines never played right to me.

9/6's @ the Borgatta seem correct.

I would like to disagree here:
I normally do not play Bally's .25 8/5 progressive, but decided to
invest $20 once and hit a royal in 3 minutes.
$1 machines in the gold room were reducing our bankroll for 8 month
prior to TITO and than, repay all of it back, once TITO was installed.
We never had a royal in Borgata, at least five royal cycles, had
other pretty decent paydays.

What I am trying to say is that machines are as (honest or dishonest)
as they been before, however they seem to produce random and
sometimes disastrous results.

···

--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "vpFREE" <vpFREE@C...> wrote: