vpFREE2 Forums

Euros hiding under our skirt again

#101

Robbie, the monkey boy, Singer originally wrote:

   " ... while I have $200k, you certainly don't."

I don't see any reference to cash. Then he followed it with:

Typical spin from someone so desperate to get out of it. So tell me,
where did I say "I have $200k in portfolio investments" or "I have
$200k in green stamps"? And just who is it in your clique that bets
anything other than CASH? See how stupid you continue to look??

   "... And then we'll bet $500k that I DO have it. So that's a

cool $700k ... "

Still no reference to cash ... Now the monkey boy says:

There you go again with the same foolishness.

> Um, the challenge was that you produce the cash. No amount of

your chicken-laced jibber-jabber will change that.

Which of course make him a liar all over again. And then he also

adds:

> I'm the one calling the shots and willing to pay if I'm wrong. So

I require to see CASH. Portfolios don't mean squat. I have a house on

> the island of Hawaii that I have over $400k equity in, but it
doesn't mean a thing if I was required to show cash tomorrow. If

you continue to squirm and wiggle your way out of the bet then who
will ever be able to trust a nerd ever again?? At least try to save
the butts of your fellow geeks! And Stop embarrassing yourself.

All this wordy gobbledegook in order to hide that fact that I've
proven him wrong again. Typical of a wannabee geek.

You're looking dumber every word. Really, what do you think the
typical, normal reader would think of you after such antics?

Rob, your challenge was that I didn't have the money and, in fact,
the challenge was that I didn't have $200K. However, it now appears
you MUST be admitting that I do have the money since you are
unwilling to look at my proof.

The show the cash. It's THAT simple.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...> wrote:

#102

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...>

wrote:

>
> Robbie, the monkey boy, Singer originally wrote:
>
> " ... while I have $200k, you certainly don't."

> I don't see any reference to cash. Then he followed it with:

Typical spin from someone so desperate to get out of it.

Your words ... not mine. Do see "cash" anywhere?

So tell me,
where did I say "I have $200k in portfolio investments" or "I have
$200k in green stamps"? And just who is it in your clique that bets
anything other than CASH? See how stupid you continue to look??

I can't help it if you make idiotic bets. If you want to bet that I
don't have a set amount of money, that's YOUR problem not mine. I
have the money and, now, you're unwilling to see the proof. You are
such a coward and mama's boy.

>
> "... And then we'll bet $500k that I DO have it. So that's a
cool $700k ... "
>
> Still no reference to cash ... Now the monkey boy says:

There you go again with the same foolishness.

More proof that facts are viewed as foolishness by the monkey boy.
Are these or are these not your EXACT words?

>
> > Um, the challenge was that you produce the cash. No amount of
your chicken-laced jibber-jabber will change that.
>
> Which of course make him a liar all over again. And then he also
adds:
>
> > I'm the one calling the shots and willing to pay if I'm wrong.

So

I require to see CASH. Portfolios don't mean squat. I have a house

on

> > the island of Hawaii that I have over $400k equity in, but it
> doesn't mean a thing if I was required to show cash tomorrow. If
you continue to squirm and wiggle your way out of the bet then who
will ever be able to trust a nerd ever again?? At least try to save
the butts of your fellow geeks! And Stop embarrassing yourself.
>
> All this wordy gobbledegook in order to hide that fact that I've
> proven him wrong again. Typical of a wannabee geek.

You're looking dumber every word.

Since these were mostly YOUR words everyone can see you are
the "dumber" one.

Really, what do you think the
typical, normal reader would think of you after such antics?

If you haven't already figured this out there probably aren't any
other readers. However, I'm sure, if a few are still hanging around,
they are saying "Well, Rob, it's your words. Are you going to back
them up or act like a coward?"

>
> Rob, your challenge was that I didn't have the money and, in

fact,

> the challenge was that I didn't have $200K. However, it now

appears

> you MUST be admitting that I do have the money since you are
> unwilling to look at my proof.

The show the cash. It's THAT simple.

Tell you what. You bring $700K cash to my house and we can go put it
in escrow, then and only then will I consider turning my assets into
cash at that time. Until then, either back up your monkey boy
challenge or go crying back to your mama, again.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "deadin7" <deadin7@y...> wrote:

#103

> > I don't see any reference to cash. Then he followed it with:
>
> Typical spin from someone so desperate to get out of it.

Your words ... not mine. Do see "cash" anywhere?

When's the last time you bet a stock portfolio, dufus?

> So tell me,
> where did I say "I have $200k in portfolio investments" or "I

have $200k in green stamps"? And just who is it in your clique that
bets anything other than CASH? See how stupid you continue to look??

I can't help it if you make idiotic bets. If you want to bet that I
don't have a set amount of money, that's YOUR problem not mine. I
have the money and, now, you're unwilling to see the proof. You are
such a coward and mama's boy.

Such a wussy there never has been. Weasel-wording isn't at all going
to cover your being afraid to make a bet you can't win.

> > "... And then we'll bet $500k that I DO have it. So that's a
> cool $700k ... "
> >
> > Still no reference to cash ... Now the monkey boy says:
>
> There you go again with the same foolishness.

More proof that facts are viewed as foolishness by the monkey boy.
Are these or are these not your EXACT words?

I must have said a thousand time to SHOW ME THE MONEY. To people with
a mind, that means cash. To weasels, that means an out because money
isn't cash?? Huh??....See how stupid you look time after time?

   
> Really, what do you think the
> typical, normal reader would think of you after such antics?

If you haven't already figured this out there probably aren't any
other readers.

That's what you would like to think because I'm sure by now you've
lost credibility even with the geeks out there.

> Show the cash. It's THAT simple.

Tell you what. You bring $700K cash to my house and we can go put

it in escrow, then and only then will I consider turning my assets
into cash at that time. Until then, either back up your monkey boy

challenge or go crying back to your mama, again.

So now you resort to changing the groundrules YET AGAIN because you
haven't a spare dime. You've said all I need to know. Show me the
cash or you have made believe once again about yet another issue.
Otherwise, issue closed now. You can whine all you want and make
yourself feel good with confidence-building phony statements about
the bet. But you've begged out and my point about you and your
phoniness have been well-made and documented right here for all geeks
to see.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...> wrote:

#104

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...>

wrote:

>
> > > I don't see any reference to cash. Then he followed it with:
> >
> > Typical spin from someone so desperate to get out of it.
>
> Your words ... not mine. Do see "cash" anywhere?

When's the last time you bet a stock portfolio, dufus?

The money was the SUBJECT of the bet. Not the AMOUNT of the bet. Are
you really this stupid or do you try harder than anyone else.

>
> > So tell me,
> > where did I say "I have $200k in portfolio investments" or "I
have $200k in green stamps"? And just who is it in your clique that
bets anything other than CASH? See how stupid you continue to look??
>
> I can't help it if you make idiotic bets. If you want to bet that

I

> don't have a set amount of money, that's YOUR problem not mine. I
> have the money and, now, you're unwilling to see the proof. You

are

> such a coward and mama's boy.

Such a wussy there never has been. Weasel-wording isn't at all

going

to cover your being afraid to make a bet you can't win.

None of your poor english can change the fact that I have accepted
your bet and am waiting for you to look at the proof.

>
> > > "... And then we'll bet $500k that I DO have it. So that's

a

> > cool $700k ... "
> > >
> > > Still no reference to cash ... Now the monkey boy says:
> >
> > There you go again with the same foolishness.
>
> More proof that facts are viewed as foolishness by the monkey

boy.

> Are these or are these not your EXACT words?

I must have said a thousand time to SHOW ME THE MONEY.

And I've said just as many times I'm more than willing.

To people with
a mind, that means cash. To weasels, that means an out because

money

isn't cash?? Huh??....See how stupid you look time after time?

LMAO. Your words, my acceptance, your failure to respond. Your
silly "that means cash" change to your original challenge is getting
as tiresome as the rest of your idiotic responses. Either admit you
are a low-life coward or come look at the proof.

>
> > Really, what do you think the
> > typical, normal reader would think of you after such antics?
>
> If you haven't already figured this out there probably aren't any
> other readers.

That's what you would like to think because I'm sure by now you've
lost credibility even with the geeks out there.

It's not what I think, it's what I know. You haven't a clue.

> > Show the cash. It's THAT simple.
>
> Tell you what. You bring $700K cash to my house and we can go put
it in escrow, then and only then will I consider turning my assets
into cash at that time. Until then, either back up your monkey boy
> challenge or go crying back to your mama, again.

So now you resort to changing the groundrules YET AGAIN because you
haven't a spare dime.

I was trying to help you out of your predicament by giving you
another option. Never mind.

You've said all I need to know. Show me the
cash or you have made believe once again about yet another issue.
Otherwise, issue closed now. You can whine all you want and make
yourself feel good with confidence-building phony statements about
the bet. But you've begged out and my point about you and your
phoniness have been well-made and documented right here for all

geeks

to see.

More worthless words. You can't hide from the EXACT quote I provided.
Your attempts are getting more panicy all the time. Now, the two or
three folks still reading this thread know you are the a complete
phony. You make challenges and then try to change them in mid-bet.
Won't work. Either put up or shut up.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "deadin7" <deadin7@y...> wrote:

#105

> > Your words ... not mine. Do see "cash" anywhere?
>
> When's the last time you bet a stock portfolio, dufus?

The money was the SUBJECT of the bet. Not the AMOUNT of the bet.

Are you really this stupid or do you try harder than anyone else.

Cash was both the SUBJECT AND the AMOUNT, dummy. I don't talk in ones
and zeroes like you make believe you do. It's a straighforward and
normal bet. Your weasel-wording only makes you look like the fool
that i know you already are.

>
> Such a wussy there never has been. Weasel-wording isn't at all
going
> to cover your being afraid to make a bet you can't win.

> I must have said a thousand time to SHOW ME THE MONEY.

And I've said just as many times I'm more than willing.

Which means you will actually show me the M-O-N-E-Y....as in money?
Or are you going to wiggle out of it again by saying 'money' that you
show me really isn't 'money' that you can spend at the store or put
into your machines you gamble too often with.

> To people with
> a mind, that means cash. To weasels, that means an out because
money
> isn't cash?? Huh??....See how stupid you look time after time?

LMAO. Your words, my acceptance, your failure to respond. Your
silly "that means cash" change to your original challenge is

getting as tiresome as the rest of your idiotic responses. Either
admit you are a low-life coward or come look at the proof.

Wiggle ans weasel all you want. All you're really saying is you can't
do it.

     
> > > Really, what do you think the
> > > typical, normal reader would think of you after such antics?
> >
> > If you haven't already figured this out there probably aren't

any

> > other readers.
>
> That's what you would like to think because I'm sure by now

you've lost credibility even with the geeks out there.

It's not what I think, it's what I know. You haven't a clue.

Wrong. Nerds know nothing.. They live in a theoterical world of
things that haven't happened yet so they can make believe they'll do
everything successfully.

>
> > > Show the cash. It's THAT simple.
> >
> > Tell you what. You bring $700K cash to my house and we can go

put

> it in escrow, then and only then will I consider turning my

assets

> into cash at that time. Until then, either back up your monkey

boy

> > challenge or go crying back to your mama, again.
>
> So now you resort to changing the groundrules YET AGAIN because

you

> haven't a spare dime.

I was trying to help you out of your predicament by giving you
another option. Never mind.

> You've said all I need to know. Show me the
> cash or you have made believe once again about yet another issue.
> Otherwise, issue closed now. You can whine all you want and make
> yourself feel good with confidence-building phony statements

about

> the bet. But you've begged out and my point about you and your
> phoniness have been well-made and documented right here for all
geeks
> to see.

More worthless words. You can't hide from the EXACT quote I

provided.

Your attempts are getting more panicy all the time. Now, the two or
three folks still reading this thread know you are the a complete
phony. You make challenges and then try to change them in mid-bet.
Won't work. Either put up or shut up.

Let's see....I changed 'money' to 'cash'. I upped the bet with a fool
like you from $200k to $700k. You come back with a thousand words
trying to say you have some sort of theoretical portfolio
with 'money' in it, but you won't SHOW ME THAT MONEY! Just like in
your video poker world, you try to make believe everything is on
paper when the rest of the world requires they feel it in their
hands. That's what a bet about having or not having money is. It's
not about words on papers. Just like math models say nothing about
successful video poker play. Solidify your nerd-world and get the
money ready to be counted.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...> wrote:

#106

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...>

wrote:

>
> > > Your words ... not mine. Do see "cash" anywhere?
> >
> > When's the last time you bet a stock portfolio, dufus?
>
> The money was the SUBJECT of the bet. Not the AMOUNT of the bet.
Are you really this stupid or do you try harder than anyone else.

Cash was both the SUBJECT AND the AMOUNT, dummy. I don't talk in

ones

and zeroes like you make believe you do. It's a straighforward and
normal bet. Your weasel-wording only makes you look like the fool
that i know you already are.

YOUR subject (cash not mentioned), monkey boy, and YOUR amount. So,
all I have to do is look at the proof and YOU lose on the subject and
then YOU can send me the AMOUNT. It's really very simple. Either put
up or shut up.

> >
> > Such a wussy there never has been. Weasel-wording isn't at all
> going
> > to cover your being afraid to make a bet you can't win.
>
> > I must have said a thousand time to SHOW ME THE MONEY.
>
> And I've said just as many times I'm more than willing.

Which means you will actually show me the M-O-N-E-Y....as in money?

Which I've agree to many times. It's all the same to any bank and
would be fine for you if you weren't such a cowardly, mamas' boy who
has already backed out of two separate bets we have made.

>
> > To people with
> > a mind, that means cash. To weasels, that means an out because
> money
> > isn't cash?? Huh??....See how stupid you look time after time?
>
> LMAO. Your words, my acceptance, your failure to respond. Your
> silly "that means cash" change to your original challenge is
getting as tiresome as the rest of your idiotic responses. Either
admit you are a low-life coward or come look at the proof.

Wiggle ans weasel all you want. All you're really saying is you

can't

do it.

No, I said I'm NOT going to do it for a lying, two-faced coward who
uses so many names that it gets hard to keep them straight. IF you
want to see it I've offered you many, many times. Either put up or
shut up.

>
> > > > Really, what do you think the
> > > > typical, normal reader would think of you after such antics?
> > >
> > > If you haven't already figured this out there probably aren't
any
> > > other readers.
> >
> > That's what you would like to think because I'm sure by now
you've lost credibility even with the geeks out there.
>
> It's not what I think, it's what I know. You haven't a clue.

Wrong. Nerds know nothing.. They live in a theoterical world of
things that haven't happened yet so they can make believe they'll

do

everything successfully.

More ridiculous bravado to hide the fact you are a coward and a
mamas' boy. Either put up or shut up.

>
> >
> > > > Show the cash. It's THAT simple.
> > >
> > > Tell you what. You bring $700K cash to my house and we can go
put
> > it in escrow, then and only then will I consider turning my
assets
> > into cash at that time. Until then, either back up your monkey
boy
> > > challenge or go crying back to your mama, again.
> >
> > So now you resort to changing the groundrules YET AGAIN because
you
> > haven't a spare dime.
>
> I was trying to help you out of your predicament by giving you
> another option. Never mind.
>
> > You've said all I need to know. Show me the
> > cash or you have made believe once again about yet another

issue.

> > Otherwise, issue closed now. You can whine all you want and

make

> > yourself feel good with confidence-building phony statements
about
> > the bet. But you've begged out and my point about you and your
> > phoniness have been well-made and documented right here for all
> geeks
> > to see.
>
> More worthless words. You can't hide from the EXACT quote I
provided.
> Your attempts are getting more panicy all the time. Now, the two

or

> three folks still reading this thread know you are the a complete
> phony. You make challenges and then try to change them in mid-

bet.

> Won't work. Either put up or shut up.

Let's see....I changed 'money' to 'cash'. I upped the bet with a

fool

like you from $200k to $700k. You come back with a thousand words
trying to say you have some sort of theoretical portfolio
with 'money' in it, but you won't SHOW ME THAT MONEY! Just like in
your video poker world, you try to make believe everything is on
paper when the rest of the world requires they feel it in their
hands. That's what a bet about having or not having money is. It's
not about words on papers. Just like math models say nothing about
successful video poker play. Solidify your nerd-world and get the
money ready to be counted.

If you had even half a brain you'd know that it would be EASIER for
me to get a loan and show you 700K in cash ... even if I didn't
actually have it, then for me you actually show you that I have a net
worth well over 700K.

If I got a loan there is no way I could lose the bet. The risk would
be zero. Instead I've offered to show you actual proof positive. The
only possible reason you could have for insisting on cash is that you
have no intention of honoring the bet. That's why I know you are a
coward and a mamas' boy and it would be waste of my time. So, either
put up or shut up.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "deadin7" <deadin7@y...> wrote:

#107

> Cash was both the SUBJECT AND the AMOUNT, dummy. I don't talk in
ones and zeroes like you make believe you do. It's a straighforward

and normal bet. Your weasel-wording only makes you look like the fool

> that I know you already are.

YOUR subject (cash not mentioned), monkey boy, and YOUR amount. So,
all I have to do is look at the proof and YOU lose on the subject

and then YOU can send me the AMOUNT. It's really very simple. Either
put up or shut up.

In a bet about how much money one has, the only way to prove it is by
showing the money, moron. Paper means nothing. You can keep on saying
the word 'cash' wasn't specifically mentioned, but all you're doing
is making yourself look even more stupid as each day goes by. And at
your age the grave just isn't that far away for you to be making
things up and wasting your own time.

> > > Such a wussy there never has been. Weasel-wording isn't at

all going to cover your being afraid to make a bet you can't win.

> >
> > > I must have said a thousand time to SHOW ME THE MONEY.
> >
> > And I've said just as many times I'm more than willing.
>
> Which means you will actually show me the M-O-N-E-Y....as in

money?

Which I've agree to many times. It's all the same to any bank and
would be fine for you if you weren't such a cowardly, mamas' boy

who has already backed out of two separate bets we have made.

> >
> > > To people with
> > > a mind, that means cash. To weasels, that means an out

because money isn't cash?? Huh??....See how stupid you look time
after time?

> >
> > LMAO. Your words, my acceptance, your failure to respond. Your
> > silly "that means cash" change to your original challenge is
> getting as tiresome as the rest of your idiotic responses. Either
> admit you are a low-life coward or come look at the proof.
>
> Wiggle and weasel all you want. All you're really saying is you
can't do it.

No, I said I'm NOT going to do it for a lying, two-faced coward who
uses so many names that it gets hard to keep them straight. IF you
want to see it I've offered you many, many times. Either put up or
shut up.

So now you agree that you've been required all along to show cash
(money to you) but you've found yet another reason not to do it. Big
surprise. And you make believe you're a successful quarter's
gambler??? What a hoot!!! Try putting a paper printout into the
machines the next time you have one of your daily uncontrollable
urges to gamble!!!!!!!!!

     
> > It's not what I think, it's what I know. You haven't a clue.
>
> Wrong. Nerds know nothing.. They live in a theoterical world of
> things that haven't happened yet so they can make believe they'll
do everything successfully.

More ridiculous bravado to hide the fact you are a coward and a
mamas' boy. Either put up or shut up.

Thank you for verifying my statement.

It's the cash--as in ANY bet requiring proof by looksee--or you'll
forever be known as one who makes believe in more ways than phony
video poker prowess. (OK, so it won't be THAT long since you've
already got one foot in the grave and the other one ain't that far
away since you just love to inhale casino smoke for hours on end).

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...> wrote:

#108

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...>

wrote:

>
> > Cash was both the SUBJECT AND the AMOUNT, dummy. I don't talk

in

> ones and zeroes like you make believe you do. It's a

straighforward

and normal bet. Your weasel-wording only makes you look like the

fool

> > that I know you already are.
>
> YOUR subject (cash not mentioned), monkey boy, and YOUR amount.

So,

> all I have to do is look at the proof and YOU lose on the subject
and then YOU can send me the AMOUNT. It's really very simple.

Either

put up or shut up.

In a bet about how much money one has, the only way to prove it is

by

showing the money, moron. Paper means nothing.

Paper means everything to those of us who have moved on from the 60s
and 70s and don't put our money in tin cans. It's unbelieveable in
this day and age that someone could be as backwards as you exhibit.
Are you sure you haven't been in prison or a coma for the last 30
years?

You can keep on saying
the word 'cash' wasn't specifically mentioned, but all you're doing
is making yourself look even more stupid as each day goes by.

I think it's pretty obvious you're looking like a prehistoric money
manager. By the way, it's the 21st century, join the party.

And at
your age the grave just isn't that far away for you to be making
things up and wasting your own time.

You just can't help looking like a fool, can you? I've got my money
working for me. In fact, I've gained well over 100K in the last year
alone. Beats the hell out that tin can you use, monkey boy. Now, if
you want to see how a 21st century MAN handles money, my offer still
stands. Put up or shut up.

>
> > > > Such a wussy there never has been. Weasel-wording isn't at
all going to cover your being afraid to make a bet you can't win.
> > >
> > > > I must have said a thousand time to SHOW ME THE MONEY.
> > >
> > > And I've said just as many times I'm more than willing.
> >
> > Which means you will actually show me the M-O-N-E-Y....as in
money?
>
> Which I've agree to many times. It's all the same to any bank and
> would be fine for you if you weren't such a cowardly, mamas' boy
who has already backed out of two separate bets we have made.
>
> > >
> > > > To people with
> > > > a mind, that means cash. To weasels, that means an out
because money isn't cash?? Huh??....See how stupid you look time
after time?
> > >
> > > LMAO. Your words, my acceptance, your failure to respond.

Your

> > > silly "that means cash" change to your original challenge is
> > getting as tiresome as the rest of your idiotic responses.

Either

> > admit you are a low-life coward or come look at the proof.
> >
> > Wiggle and weasel all you want. All you're really saying is you
> can't do it.
>
> No, I said I'm NOT going to do it for a lying, two-faced coward

who

> uses so many names that it gets hard to keep them straight. IF

you

> want to see it I've offered you many, many times. Either put up

or

> shut up.

So now you agree that you've been required all along to show cash

Nope. Never will. However, if you think you can understand the real
financial world I'll to take you on a tour. Although I realize you
are a small insignificant worm in the vast world I inhabit, it will
be a fun to see your jaw dragging on the floor.

(money to you) but you've found yet another reason not to do it.

Big

surprise. And you make believe you're a successful quarter's
gambler??? What a hoot!!! Try putting a paper printout into the
machines the next time you have one of your daily uncontrollable
urges to gamble!!!!!!!!!
>
> > > It's not what I think, it's what I know. You haven't a clue.
> >
> > Wrong. Nerds know nothing.. They live in a theoterical world of
> > things that haven't happened yet so they can make believe

they'll

> do everything successfully.
>
> More ridiculous bravado to hide the fact you are a coward and a
> mamas' boy. Either put up or shut up.

Thank you for verifying my statement.

If that statement was the sound of your slithering body, then you are
most welcome.

It's the cash--as in ANY bet requiring proof by looksee--or you'll
forever be known as one who makes believe in more ways than phony
video poker prowess. (OK, so it won't be THAT long since you've
already got one foot in the grave and the other one ain't that far
away since you just love to inhale casino smoke for hours on end).

You have my offer, prehistoric worm. Now, put up or slither back into
the ancient hole from whence you came.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "deadin7" <deadin7@y...> wrote:

#109

> In a bet about how much money one has, the only way to prove it

is by showing the money, moron. Paper means nothing.

Paper means everything to those of us who have moved on from the

60s and 70s and don't put our money in tin cans. It's unbelieveable
in this day and age that someone could be as backwards as you
exhibit. Are you sure you haven't been in prison or a coma for the
last 30 years?

Hey, you sure do get back in from the casino a little on the angry
side! Last time I heard, if someone bets another that they don't have
X amount of money, they produce the money and not some obscure
methodology that may or may not be true....and definitely cannot be
verified as absolute by the challenger. And on a $700k bet, I'd say
(as well as common sense says) that absolute proof is needed.
Therefore, the only logical way to satisfy both parties is by
producing the actual money. Are you that far out of touch with
reality not to see such a truth---or are you really trying to get out
of it by continuing on with your illogic?

> And at
> your age the grave just isn't that far away for you to be making
> things up and wasting your own time.

You just can't help looking like a fool, can you? I've got my money
working for me. In fact, I've gained well over 100K in the last

year alone.

Just how impressive is THAT supposed to be? I made six figures for
the first time in 1985. I guess you beat me to the blab! And if you
call 'working for you' the inate ability to fire bills into the poker
machine feeders in a frenzy, you're in a class of your own with that
one.

Beats the hell out that tin can you use, monkey boy. Now, if you

want to see how a 21st century MAN handles money, my offer still
stands. Put up or shut up.

A 21st century 'man'? HAHA! You're old, you're fat, and you're
stupid. I sure hope mankind has a much better future than the one you
blazed.

> So now you agree that you've been required all along to show cash

Nope. Never will. However, if you think you can understand the real
financial world I'll to take you on a tour. Although I realize you
are a small insignificant worm in the vast world I inhabit, it will
be a fun to see your jaw dragging on the floor.

Tell me, how can you expect anyone to believe you know ANYTHING about
finances when you paint a picture that says you have a significant
gambling problem? No, you don't and won't see it, but it's there.
clear as an Arizona sunny day....it's there.

> It's the cash--as in ANY bet requiring proof by looksee--or

you'll

> forever be known as one who makes believe in more ways than phony
> video poker prowess. (OK, so it won't be THAT long since you've
> already got one foot in the grave and the other one ain't that

far away since you just love to inhale casino smoke for hours on end).

You have my offer, prehistoric worm. Now, put up or slither back

into the ancient hole from whence you came.

I guess you're lost for effective words. You always are when I expose
your inner demons with gambling.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...> wrote:

#110

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...>

wrote:

>
> > In a bet about how much money one has, the only way to prove it
is by showing the money, moron. Paper means nothing.
>
> Paper means everything to those of us who have moved on from the
60s and 70s and don't put our money in tin cans. It's unbelieveable
in this day and age that someone could be as backwards as you
exhibit. Are you sure you haven't been in prison or a coma for the
last 30 years?

Hey, you sure do get back in from the casino a little on the angry
side! Last time I heard, if someone bets another that they don't

have

X amount of money, they produce the money and not some obscure
methodology that may or may not be true....and definitely cannot be
verified as absolute by the challenger.

Of course it can be easily verified. Do I need to educated you in how
to use the Interent too? Just another excuse for the master of
excuses. Now, either put up or shut up.

And on a $700k bet, I'd say
(as well as common sense says) that absolute proof is needed.
Therefore, the only logical way to satisfy both parties is by
producing the actual money. Are you that far out of touch with
reality not to see such a truth---or are you really trying to get

out

of it by continuing on with your illogic?

I already explained to you that cash really IS NOT a good indication.
Getting a risk free loan would provide the cash without the person
actually having the funds. Your excuses keep getting lamer every
time. Come out of your prehistoric den and join the rest of us,
monkey boy, as a side benefit I'll explain to you how some of the
other techinical advances have made life better.

>
> > And at
> > your age the grave just isn't that far away for you to be

making

> > things up and wasting your own time.
>
> You just can't help looking like a fool, can you? I've got my

money

> working for me. In fact, I've gained well over 100K in the last
year alone.

Just how impressive is THAT supposed to be? I made six figures for
the first time in 1985.

And you only have $700K to show for it? That's the problem with tin
cans. The money doesn't grow. For this $100K (actually closer to
$200K) all I did was sit back and watch it grow.

> > So now you agree that you've been required all along to show

cash

>
> Nope. Never will. However, if you think you can understand the

real

> financial world I'll to take you on a tour. Although I realize

you

> are a small insignificant worm in the vast world I inhabit, it

will

> be a fun to see your jaw dragging on the floor.

Tell me, how can you expect anyone to believe you know ANYTHING

about

finances when you paint a picture that says you have a significant
gambling problem? No, you don't and won't see it, but it's there.
clear as an Arizona sunny day....it's there.

The sun in Arizona has nothing to do with your old fashioned way of
handling money. You are such the fool. Now, either put up or shut up.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "deadin7" <deadin7@y...> wrote:

#111

> Hey, you sure do get back in from the casino a little on the

angry side! Last time I heard, if someone bets another that they
don't have X amount of money, they produce the money and not some
obscure methodology that may or may not be true....and definitely
cannot be verified as absolute by the challenger.

Of course it can be easily verified. Do I need to educated you in

how to use the Interent too? Just another excuse for the master of

excuses. Now, either put up or shut up.

Here's a clue, Mr. Genius--Internet sites can be manipulated by
someone with half a brain....and that includes the likes of you. And
if you were in-line to receive $700k by being able to show some
numbers that you made up, you'd go thru whatever hoops possible and
spend whatever you had to in order to make it so. CASH is the ONLY
indisputable proof. It's becoming more and more clear that you'd say
anything in order not to have to go thru with this. all you're doing
is becoming weaker by the minute with your song and dance. And all
this--for a bet that I have zero chance of collecting on when I prove
you don't have a dime. You must be nuts.

> And on a $700k bet, I'd say
> (as well as common sense says) that absolute proof is needed.
> Therefore, the only logical way to satisfy both parties is by
> producing the actual money. Are you that far out of touch with
> reality not to see such a truth---or are you really trying to get
out
> of it by continuing on with your illogic?

I already explained to you that cash really IS NOT a good

indication. Getting a risk free loan would provide the cash without
the person actually having the funds. Your excuses keep getting lamer
every time. Come out of your prehistoric den and join the rest of us,

monkey boy, as a side benefit I'll explain to you how some of the
other techinical advances have made life better.

A "risk-free" loan? HAHAHA!! What an imbecile you are! Does your
imagination have no limits? As I said, you must be nuts oif you shy
away from and make excuse-after-excuse about presenting the cash. And
I'll tell you what--I won't care if you get one of those (hehehe!)
LOANS or not! That'll mean you have a portfolio strong enough to
withstand that kind of cash loan. Just show up with the cash and
we'll dance.

> > You just can't help looking like a fool, can you? I've got my
money working for me. In fact, I've gained well over 100K in the

last year alone.

>
> Just how impressive is THAT supposed to be? I made six figures

for the first time in 1985.

And you only have $700K to show for it? That's the problem with tin
cans. The money doesn't grow. For this $100K (actually closer to
$200K) all I did was sit back and watch it grow.

Nope. My 401k is 7 figures, my 3600 sq. ft. house here is 85% paid,
and my $550k home in Kona, Hawaii is 65% paid. And none of that
includes what my wife has accumulated from her 26 years as an
engineer at a major aerospace company in town. So if I'm willing to
grab $700k with a 10% penalty from my account to pay you off, you're
nothing but stupid if you keep running away from it all. And I'll
tell you what. You show up here and I might even let you stay
overnight FOR FREE in my guest house....sort of like a comp, only not
in one of the dumps you're used to when you play video poker.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...> wrote:

#112

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...>

wrote:

>
> > Hey, you sure do get back in from the casino a little on the
angry side! Last time I heard, if someone bets another that they
don't have X amount of money, they produce the money and not some
obscure methodology that may or may not be true....and definitely
cannot be verified as absolute by the challenger.
>
> Of course it can be easily verified. Do I need to educated you in
how to use the Interent too? Just another excuse for the master of
> excuses. Now, either put up or shut up.

Here's a clue, Mr. Genius--Internet sites can be manipulated by
someone with half a brain....and that includes the likes of you.

Not sites using secure sockets and HTTPS (SECURE hypertext transfer
protocol). All financial institutions use these protocols. You are
way, way out of your league here, monkey boy.

And
if you were in-line to receive $700k by being able to show some
numbers that you made up, you'd go thru whatever hoops possible and
spend whatever you had to in order to make it so.

Yep, but I already know you're a liar and a fraud. Just admit I'm too
smart for you and move on.

CASH is the ONLY
indisputable proof. It's becoming more and more clear that you'd

say

anything in order not to have to go thru with this. all you're

doing

is becoming weaker by the minute with your song and dance. And all
this--for a bet that I have zero chance of collecting on when I

prove

you don't have a dime. You must be nuts.

More worthless excuses. Does anyone else in the civilized world keep
all their money in CASH (except Robbie, the prehistoric investor)?
Now, either put up or shut up.

>
> > And on a $700k bet, I'd say
> > (as well as common sense says) that absolute proof is needed.
> > Therefore, the only logical way to satisfy both parties is by
> > producing the actual money. Are you that far out of touch with
> > reality not to see such a truth---or are you really trying to

get

> out
> > of it by continuing on with your illogic?
>
> I already explained to you that cash really IS NOT a good
indication. Getting a risk free loan would provide the cash without
the person actually having the funds. Your excuses keep getting

lamer

every time. Come out of your prehistoric den and join the rest of

us,

> monkey boy, as a side benefit I'll explain to you how some of the
> other techinical advances have made life better.

A "risk-free" loan? HAHAHA!! What an imbecile you are! Does your
imagination have no limits?

Facts have "no limits". Do you want me to explain it to you again. If
someone were to loan someone $700K on a bet that is automatically won
by the presence of the $700K, they couldn't lose. That's about as
risk free as it gets. A homeless person could win a cash bet. Now,
please stop with the brain farts, it's starting to smell up the
thread.

>
> > > You just can't help looking like a fool, can you? I've got my
> money working for me. In fact, I've gained well over 100K in the
last year alone.
> >
> > Just how impressive is THAT supposed to be? I made six figures
for the first time in 1985.
>
> And you only have $700K to show for it? That's the problem with

tin

> cans. The money doesn't grow. For this $100K (actually closer to
> $200K) all I did was sit back and watch it grow.

Nope. My 401k is 7 figures, my 3600 sq. ft. house here is 85% paid,
and my $550k home in Kona, Hawaii is 65% paid. And none of that
includes what my wife has accumulated from her 26 years as an
engineer at a major aerospace company in town. So if I'm willing to
grab $700k with a 10% penalty from my account to pay you off,

you're

nothing but stupid if you keep running away from it all. And I'll
tell you what. You show up here and I might even let you stay
overnight FOR FREE in my guest house....sort of like a comp, only

not

in one of the dumps you're used to when you play video poker.

More BS from the BS master. However, I have now learned that your
wife is supporting you. No wonder you have so much time for your
internet addiction. In addition, everyone now knows who wears the
pants in the Singer household. I suspect she'd probably go crazy if
she had to spend any time with you. All that chest beating and brain
farting ...

Now, either back up your challenge or slither away.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "deadin7" <deadin7@y...> wrote:

#113

> Here's a clue, Mr. Genius--Internet sites can be manipulated by
> someone with half a brain....and that includes the likes of you.

Not sites using secure sockets and HTTPS (SECURE hypertext transfer
protocol). All financial institutions use these protocols. You are
way, way out of your league here, monkey boy.

You're so naive. You're so full of yourself and all that useless,
geeky computer baloney that my clue went flying way over your head.
Here's a BIG hint: MONEY TALKS, and anyone with half-a-brain knows
that, bazookahead.

> And
> if you were in-line to receive $700k by being able to show some
> numbers that you made up, you'd go thru whatever hoops possible

and spend whatever you had to in order to make it so.

Yep, but I already know you're a liar and a fraud.

You know nothing, and you say that just to try to get out of the bet.
So many excuses....so easy to see.

Just admit I'm too smart for you and move on.

Gee Mr. Wizard, can I try that too???

> CASH is the ONLY
> indisputable proof. It's becoming more and more clear that you'd
say anything in order not to have to go thru with this. All you're
doing is becoming weaker by the minute with your song and dance.

And all this--for a bet that I have zero chance of collecting on when
I prove you don't have a dime. You must be nuts.

More worthless excuses. Does anyone else in the civilized world

keep all their money in CASH (except Robbie, the prehistoric
investor)? Now, either put up or shut up.

HELLO McFLY? ANYBODY HOME??? You can turn any asset into cash, and
to get my $700k I'd think you'd do whatever it takes. Wonder why you
won't…

> > > And on a $700k bet, I'd say
> > > (as well as common sense says) that absolute proof is needed.
> > > Therefore, the only logical way to satisfy both parties is by
> > > producing the actual money. Are you that far out of touch

with reality not to see such a truth---or are you really trying to

get out of it by continuing on with your illogic?
> >
> > I already explained to you that cash really IS NOT a good
> indication. Getting a risk free loan would provide the cash

without

> the person actually having the funds. Your excuses keep getting
lamer
> every time. Come out of your prehistoric den and join the rest of
us,
> > monkey boy, as a side benefit I'll explain to you how some of

the

> > other techinical advances have made life better.
>
> A "risk-free" loan? HAHAHA!! What an imbecile you are! Does your
> imagination have no limits?

Facts have "no limits". Do you want me to explain it to you again.

If someone were to loan someone $700K on a bet that is automatically
won by the presence of the $700K, they couldn't lose. That's about as

risk free as it gets. A homeless person could win a cash bet. Now,
please stop with the brain farts, it's starting to smell up the
thread.

Here's a million dollar (excuse me, a $700,000) hint: DO IT!!!

  
> > > > You just can't help looking like a fool, can you? I've got

my

> > money working for me. In fact, I've gained well over 100K in

the

> last year alone.
> > >
> > > Just how impressive is THAT supposed to be? I made six

figures for the first time in 1985.

> >
> > And you only have $700K to show for it? That's the problem with
tin cans. The money doesn't grow. For this $100K (actually closer

to $200K) all I did was sit back and watch it grow.

>
> Nope. My 401k is 7 figures, my 3600 sq. ft. house here is 85%

paid, and my $550k home in Kona, Hawaii is 65% paid. And none of that

> includes what my wife has accumulated from her 26 years as an
> engineer at a major aerospace company in town. So if I'm willing

to grab $700k with a 10% penalty from my account to pay you off,

you're nothing but stupid if you keep running away from it all. And

I'll tell you what. You show up here and I might even let you stay

> overnight FOR FREE in my guest house....sort of like a comp, only
not in one of the dumps you're used to when you play video poker.

More BS from the BS master. However, I have now learned that your
wife is supporting you. No wonder you have so much time for your
internet addiction. In addition, everyone now knows who wears the
pants in the Singer household. I suspect she'd probably go crazy if
she had to spend any time with you. All that chest beating and

brain farting ...

Seems like you love to believe what you create out of what you're
told. I'm working you like a dishcloth. The reason I have so much
time is found on my site--because I do only what you fantasize about.
I won my '04 goal by 9/5/04, and I won't be playing (I know it hurts
you to even have to READ about this type of thing) until sometime in
Feb. again. Yes, that's FEBRUARY, Mr. problem gambler. Imagine that!

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...> wrote:

#114

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...>

wrote:

>
> > Here's a clue, Mr. Genius--Internet sites can be manipulated by
> > someone with half a brain....and that includes the likes of you.
>
> Not sites using secure sockets and HTTPS (SECURE hypertext

transfer

> protocol). All financial institutions use these protocols. You

are

> way, way out of your league here, monkey boy.

You're so naive. You're so full of yourself and all that useless,
geeky computer baloney that my clue went flying way over your head.
Here's a BIG hint: MONEY TALKS, and anyone with half-a-brain knows
that, bazookahead.

Me thinks you've been watching too much TV. We're not talking
anything complicated here. It's simply looking at SECURE financial
records online. This is nothing mysterious. It's done everyday.
Neither you nor I have the resources to bribe major financial
institutions. In any event, it would be FAR less costly to get that
old cash loan. Your excuses are getting more idiotic every time.

>
> > And
> > if you were in-line to receive $700k by being able to show some
> > numbers that you made up, you'd go thru whatever hoops possible
and spend whatever you had to in order to make it so.
>
> Yep, but I already know you're a liar and a fraud.

You know nothing, and you say that just to try to get out of the

bet.

So many excuses....so easy to see.

Just admit I'm too smart for you and move on.

Gee Mr. Wizard, can I try that too???

No, it would be a lie if you tried it.

>
> > CASH is the ONLY
> > indisputable proof. It's becoming more and more clear that

you'd

> say anything in order not to have to go thru with this. All

you're

> doing is becoming weaker by the minute with your song and dance.
And all this--for a bet that I have zero chance of collecting on

when

I prove you don't have a dime. You must be nuts.
>
> More worthless excuses. Does anyone else in the civilized world
keep all their money in CASH (except Robbie, the prehistoric
investor)? Now, either put up or shut up.

HELLO McFLY? ANYBODY HOME??? You can turn any asset into cash, and
to get my $700k I'd think you'd do whatever it takes. Wonder why

you

won't.....

Let's see ... Rob, now knows everything about me (see addiction
thread) and yet still bets I don't have the funds. This presents a
bit of a dichotomy. If he really knew everthing about me then he'd
know I HAVE the funds, but since he's still here mouthing off, I
guess that means he really doesn't know a thing about me. I'm feeling
pretty good about that $15K right now.

>
> > > > And on a $700k bet, I'd say
> > > > (as well as common sense says) that absolute proof is

needed.

> > > > Therefore, the only logical way to satisfy both parties is

by

> > > > producing the actual money. Are you that far out of touch
with reality not to see such a truth---or are you really trying to
> get out of it by continuing on with your illogic?
> > >
> > > I already explained to you that cash really IS NOT a good
> > indication. Getting a risk free loan would provide the cash
without
> > the person actually having the funds. Your excuses keep getting
> lamer
> > every time. Come out of your prehistoric den and join the rest

of

> us,
> > > monkey boy, as a side benefit I'll explain to you how some of
the
> > > other techinical advances have made life better.
> >
> > A "risk-free" loan? HAHAHA!! What an imbecile you are! Does

your

> > imagination have no limits?
>
> Facts have "no limits". Do you want me to explain it to you

again.

If someone were to loan someone $700K on a bet that is

automatically

won by the presence of the $700K, they couldn't lose. That's about

as

> risk free as it gets. A homeless person could win a cash bet.

Now,

> please stop with the brain farts, it's starting to smell up the
> thread.

Here's a million dollar (excuse me, a $700,000) hint: DO IT!!!

Since you know so much about me (you must know I HAVE THE FUNDS) and
you obviously want me to have the money, let's skip the minor
details, just send it to me. (He already knows my address too).

>
> > > > > You just can't help looking like a fool, can you? I've

got

my
> > > money working for me. In fact, I've gained well over 100K in
the
> > last year alone.
> > > >
> > > > Just how impressive is THAT supposed to be? I made six
figures for the first time in 1985.
> > >
> > > And you only have $700K to show for it? That's the problem

with

> tin cans. The money doesn't grow. For this $100K (actually closer
to $200K) all I did was sit back and watch it grow.
> >
> > Nope. My 401k is 7 figures, my 3600 sq. ft. house here is 85%
paid, and my $550k home in Kona, Hawaii is 65% paid. And none of

that

> > includes what my wife has accumulated from her 26 years as an
> > engineer at a major aerospace company in town. So if I'm

willing

to grab $700k with a 10% penalty from my account to pay you off,
> you're nothing but stupid if you keep running away from it all.

And

I'll tell you what. You show up here and I might even let you stay
> > overnight FOR FREE in my guest house....sort of like a comp,

only

> not in one of the dumps you're used to when you play video poker.
>
> More BS from the BS master. However, I have now learned that your
> wife is supporting you. No wonder you have so much time for your
> internet addiction. In addition, everyone now knows who wears the
> pants in the Singer household. I suspect she'd probably go crazy

if

> she had to spend any time with you. All that chest beating and
brain farting ...

Seems like you love to believe what you create out of what you're
told. I'm working you like a dishcloth.

Was this an attempt to sound smart? A dishcloth? Oh my God, not the
deadly dishcloth. And working it too. What a man. Of course, now that
we know you do all the housework (esp. dishes) it's not too
surprising you'd use that subject matter. This is the best one yet.
My ribs are hurting again.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "deadin7" <deadin7@y...> wrote:

#115

> > > Here's a clue, Mr. Genius--Internet sites can be manipulated

by someone with half a brain....and that includes the likes of you.

> >
> > Not sites using secure sockets and HTTPS (SECURE hypertext
transfer protocol). All financial institutions use these protocols.

You are way, way out of your league here, monkey boy.

>
> You're so naive. You're so full of yourself and all that useless,
> geeky computer baloney that my clue went flying way over your

head. Here's a BIG hint: MONEY TALKS, and anyone with half-a-brain
knows that, bazookahead.

Me thinks you've been watching too much TV. We're not talking
anything complicated here. It's simply looking at SECURE financial
records online. This is nothing mysterious. It's done everyday.
Neither you nor I have the resources to bribe major financial
institutions.

Well then you're not the total geek I thought you were. When one of
your geek-guru heroes sent me a virus from another identity at their
place of work because they couldn't take the criticizm I dished out,
I had some 'people' come over here, they plugged some gadget into my
computer line, and they had all his private information within an
hour. I embarrassed the hell out of this idiot. I would expect you
should be able to get into ANY system if you're as smart as you think
you are. Teenage kids can hack a financial institution--esp. just for
manipulating transferred records without making any actual
transactions. That's why CASH is the only safe way---via loan or not!

> > > And
> > > if you were in-line to receive $700k by being able to show

some

> > > numbers that you made up, you'd go thru whatever hoops

possible

> and spend whatever you had to in order to make it so.
> >
> > Yep, but I already know you're a liar and a fraud.
>
> You know nothing, and you say that just to try to get out of the
bet. So many excuses....so easy to see.
>
> > > CASH is the ONLY
> > > indisputable proof. It's becoming more and more clear that
you'd say anything in order not to have to go thru with this. All
you're doing is becoming weaker by the minute with your song and

dance. And all this--for a bet that I have zero chance of collecting
on when I prove you don't have a dime. You must be nuts.

> >
> > More worthless excuses. Does anyone else in the civilized world
> keep all their money in CASH (except Robbie, the prehistoric
> investor)? Now, either put up or shut up.
>
> HELLO McFLY? ANYBODY HOME??? You can turn any asset into cash,

and to get my $700k I'd think you'd do whatever it takes. Wonder why

you won't.....

Let's see ... Rob, now knows everything about me (see addiction
thread) and yet still bets I don't have the funds. This presents a
bit of a dichotomy. If he really knew everthing about me then he'd
know I HAVE the funds, but since he's still here mouthing off, I
guess that means he really doesn't know a thing about me. I'm

feeling pretty good about that $15K right now.

Then whatcha got to lose by presenting the cash, Mr. Genius? It's
your only way out of the corner you've painted yourself into, in case
you haven't taken the time to look.

  
> Here's a million dollar (excuse me, a $700,000) hint: DO IT!!!

Since you know so much about me (you must know I HAVE THE FUNDS)

and you obviously want me to have the money, let's skip the minor

details, just send it to me. (He already knows my address too).

More change-the-subject small talk. Agree to showing me the CASH or
look stupider every second!

   
> > More BS from the BS master. However, I have now learned that

your

> > wife is supporting you. No wonder you have so much time for

your

> > internet addiction. In addition, everyone now knows who wears

the

> > pants in the Singer household. I suspect she'd probably go

crazy

if
> > she had to spend any time with you. All that chest beating and
> brain farting ...
>
> Seems like you love to believe what you create out of what you're
> told. I'm working you like a dishcloth.

Was this an attempt to sound smart? A dishcloth? Oh my God, not the
deadly dishcloth. And working it too. What a man. Of course, now

that we know you do all the housework (esp. dishes) it's not too

surprising you'd use that subject matter. This is the best one yet.
My ribs are hurting again.

I enjoy doing the dishes, I love to babysit my granddaughter, and I
enjoy putting in a 455 into my '70 GTO. Hold onto your ribs, cause
there's more. I get a kick out of taking out the garbage, and I like
tuning my new Dodge Magnum's Nitrous Oxide's system. It's fun here
going out when it rains, and my Harley never gets wet. Ribs hanging
in there? I'm good at cooking for my wife, and I like to rebuild my
SHO's supercharger. Now let's here it from Dicky the addict: "I LOVE
TO BE IN CASINOS"! Guess who the fool is!!!???!!

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...> wrote:

#116

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...>

wrote:

>
> > > > Here's a clue, Mr. Genius--Internet sites can be

manipulated

by someone with half a brain....and that includes the likes of you.
> > >
> > > Not sites using secure sockets and HTTPS (SECURE hypertext
> transfer protocol). All financial institutions use these

protocols.

You are way, way out of your league here, monkey boy.
> >
> > You're so naive. You're so full of yourself and all that

useless,

> > geeky computer baloney that my clue went flying way over your
head. Here's a BIG hint: MONEY TALKS, and anyone with half-a-brain
knows that, bazookahead.
>
> Me thinks you've been watching too much TV. We're not talking
> anything complicated here. It's simply looking at SECURE

financial

> records online. This is nothing mysterious. It's done everyday.
> Neither you nor I have the resources to bribe major financial
> institutions.

Well then you're not the total geek I thought you were. When one of
your geek-guru heroes sent me a virus from another identity at

their

place of work because they couldn't take the criticizm I dished

out,

I had some 'people' come over here, they plugged some gadget into

my

computer line, and they had all his private information within an
hour. I embarrassed the hell out of this idiot. I would expect you
should be able to get into ANY system if you're as smart as you

think

you are. Teenage kids can hack a financial institution--esp. just

for

manipulating transferred records without making any actual
transactions. That's why CASH is the only safe way---via loan or

not!

Simply not true, Robese one. The hackers only have success when
things like firewalls are not used. EVERY financial institution now
uses them (normally several of them). I sure hope you have one
installed on your computer. The other mechanism is email, for that
there are virus detection programs. With your bad experience I sure
hope you have one of those installed.

Get with the 21st century.

>
> Let's see ... Rob, now knows everything about me (see addiction
> thread) and yet still bets I don't have the funds. This presents

a

> bit of a dichotomy. If he really knew everthing about me then

he'd

> know I HAVE the funds, but since he's still here mouthing off, I
> guess that means he really doesn't know a thing about me. I'm
feeling pretty good about that $15K right now.

Then whatcha got to lose by presenting the cash, Mr. Genius? It's
your only way out of the corner you've painted yourself into, in

case

you haven't taken the time to look.

The point is, oh Robese one, I have nothing to gain.

>
> > Here's a million dollar (excuse me, a $700,000) hint: DO IT!!!
>
> Since you know so much about me (you must know I HAVE THE FUNDS)
and you obviously want me to have the money, let's skip the minor
> details, just send it to me. (He already knows my address too).

More change-the-subject small talk. Agree to showing me the CASH or
look stupider every second!

Now, the Robese one is starting to back off. Where's that "I know
everything about you" bravado? LMAO.

> >
> > Seems like you love to believe what you create out of what

you're

> > told. I'm working you like a dishcloth.
>
> Was this an attempt to sound smart? A dishcloth? Oh my God, not

the

> deadly dishcloth. And working it too. What a man. Of course, now
that we know you do all the housework (esp. dishes) it's not too
> surprising you'd use that subject matter. This is the best one

yet.

> My ribs are hurting again.

I enjoy doing the dishes, ... I'm good at cooking for my wife ...

Of course you do, Robese one, what else can an unemployable loser
say. I just wonder what your wife gets out of all this ... (besides
the free maid, cook and nanny).

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "deadin7" <deadin7@y...> wrote:

#117

> Well then you're not the total geek I thought you were. When one

of

> your geek-guru heroes sent me a virus from another identity at
their
> place of work because they couldn't take the criticizm I dished
out,
> I had some 'people' come over here, they plugged some gadget into
my
> computer line, and they had all his private information within an
> hour. I embarrassed the hell out of this idiot. I would expect

you

> should be able to get into ANY system if you're as smart as you
think
> you are. Teenage kids can hack a financial institution--esp. just
for
> manipulating transferred records without making any actual
> transactions. That's why CASH is the only safe way---via loan or
not!

Simply not true, Robese one. The hackers only have success when
things like firewalls are not used. EVERY financial institution now
uses them (normally several of them). I sure hope you have one
installed on your computer. The other mechanism is email, for that
there are virus detection programs. With your bad experience I sure
hope you have one of those installed.

Get with the 21st century.

Like you said before, we're leagues apart. I'm no computer fairy, but
the people I'm associated with are. And they're Government. So many
leagues apart....

The rest of your blabber is unimportant compared to this. But you
lucked out again. We're leaving until Monday to the coast. and no,
I'm not a geek and I don't take some stupid laptop with me. But next
week I'll be glad to work you over some more.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...> wrote:

#118

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...>

wrote:

>
> > Well then you're not the total geek I thought you were. When

one

of
> > your geek-guru heroes sent me a virus from another identity at
> their
> > place of work because they couldn't take the criticizm I dished
> out,
> > I had some 'people' come over here, they plugged some gadget

into

> my
> > computer line, and they had all his private information within

an

> > hour. I embarrassed the hell out of this idiot. I would expect
you
> > should be able to get into ANY system if you're as smart as you
> think
> > you are. Teenage kids can hack a financial institution--esp.

just

> for
> > manipulating transferred records without making any actual
> > transactions. That's why CASH is the only safe way---via loan

or

> not!
>
> Simply not true, Robese one. The hackers only have success when
> things like firewalls are not used. EVERY financial institution

now

> uses them (normally several of them). I sure hope you have one
> installed on your computer. The other mechanism is email, for

that

> there are virus detection programs. With your bad experience I

sure

> hope you have one of those installed.
>
> Get with the 21st century.

Like you said before, we're leagues apart. I'm no computer fairy,

but

the people I'm associated with are. And they're Government. So many
leagues apart....

Just why do you think the gov't tried to block 64 bit encryption?
Because, that locked out their access to encrypted information. Oh,
by the way, I use 128 bit encryption and a firewall. Let me know when
you move out of the minor leagues.

>
The rest of your blabber is unimportant compared to this. But you
lucked out again. We're leaving until Monday to the coast. and no,
I'm not a geek and I don't take some stupid laptop with me. But

next

week I'll be glad to work you over some more.

Run, run little rabbit. I suspect you'd have a laptop with you if
only your wife would let you. She probably doesn't want to go to all
the effort of showing you how to open it up.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "deadin7" <deadin7@y...> wrote:

#119

I just returned from signing a book contract for my 3rd installment
to the UNDENIABLE TRUTH series. Hope continues to be on the way.

Gee, I know I missed Addict Dick's words of wisdom which I won't be
reading now that I'm back -- along with John 'no-royals' aimless
blabbering about liberals, sour grapes, cowardice, and made-up
interpretations of the news. I'm also going to delete my membership
to this forum as soon as I finish this, because I have to get the
book moving, and with so many players writing me daily (because I
have the fame in video poker you long for, Dicky) I'll be a bit too
busy.

One thing I've learned about old geeks frim all this: They have zero
tolerance for common sense if it goes against the grain of their make-
believe, theoretical paper-based world. Another is that they are no
different from the run-of-the-mill video-poker-playing addict out
there. Getting out to play ALWAYS transcends all that is sacred,
DENIAL is a huge part of their lives--which becomes even more visible
when he who denies can come back with no response to any truth other
than to repititiously claim the writer is looking into a mirror when
painting Addict Dick's true picture, and the driving need to get
others to agree with them in order that they can continue to justify
their out-of-control gambling problem very likely comes before
family. Case in point? Who here thinks for a split second that The
Dicker hasn't ruined his life by way of never being able to enjoy
anything other than the intermittent satisfaction obtained from his
compulsion to play? When there becomes no such thing as a normal
vacation any longer....when video poker play is habitually tossed in
to every trip in any direction....and when the pathological gambler
constantly posts to every video poker forum on the Internet in an
attempt to get approval of his on-paper-only playing prowess that's
unwittingly backed up by the creation of success.

I'm hoping Dicky has learned not to re-invent bets in the future. If
you don't have it you SAY you don't have it and move on. Typical of
nerds who've been the butt of jokes their entire life, mealy-mouthed
double-talk and nebulous interpretations of words that are clear to
the rest of the world only serve to create self-humiliation.

When I see such a sad story as the one Dicky lives, it makes me want
to terminate my play. The desire to play alongside such pathetic
addicts as well as the ultra-low-class of video poker's mainstream
players, i.e., "Life's Leftovers" has prompted me to think about it
between now and Jan.

I'll be terminating as soon as i send this, but I'm sure the geek
will be compelled to write something anyway in order that he clear
his mind of the truths I've presented about him. What's a geek
without self-confidence building??

And don't forget who the "Man of the Year" was named this weekend:
That's right--GWB!!!

#120

I just returned from signing a book contract for my 3rd installment
to the UNDENIABLE TRUTH series. Hope continues to be on the way.

Suckers beware ....

Gee, I know I missed Addict Dick's words of wisdom which I won't be
reading now that I'm back -- along with John 'no-royals' aimless
blabbering about liberals, sour grapes, cowardice, and made-up
interpretations of the news. I'm also going to delete my membership
to this forum as soon as I finish this, because I have to get the
book moving, and with so many players writing me daily (because I
have the fame in video poker you long for, Dicky) I'll be a bit too
busy.

The BS master never quits. LMAO.

One thing I've learned about old geeks frim all this: They have

zero

tolerance for common sense if it goes against the grain of their

make-

believe, theoretical paper-based world. Another is that they are no
different from the run-of-the-mill video-poker-playing addict out
there. Getting out to play ALWAYS transcends all that is sacred,
DENIAL is a huge part of their lives--which becomes even more

visible

when he who denies can come back with no response to any truth

other

than to repititiously claim the writer is looking into a mirror

when

painting Addict Dick's true picture, and the driving need to get
others to agree with them in order that they can continue to

justify

their out-of-control gambling problem very likely comes before
family. Case in point? Who here thinks for a split second that The
Dicker hasn't ruined his life by way of never being able to enjoy
anything other than the intermittent satisfaction obtained from his
compulsion to play?

I really enjoyed my 18th hole today, sinking an 8' birdie putt. I
guess that doesn't qualify as "satisfaction" for someone who thinks
everyone who gambles for a profit is addicted.

When there becomes no such thing as a normal
vacation any longer....when video poker play is habitually tossed

in

to every trip in any direction....and when the pathological gambler
constantly posts to every video poker forum on the Internet in an
attempt to get approval of his on-paper-only playing prowess that's
unwittingly backed up by the creation of success.

As I sit here on a mini vacation with no casino in site ... By the
way, I can take my computer with me unlike Robese who can't figure
out how to open a notebook computer.

I'm hoping Dicky has learned not to re-invent bets in the future.

Everyone knows Robese is the coward and reneging fool. Probably one
of the big reasons he has departed.

If
you don't have it you SAY you don't have it and move on. Typical of
nerds who've been the butt of jokes their entire life, mealy-

mouthed

double-talk and nebulous interpretations of words that are clear to
the rest of the world only serve to create self-humiliation.

When I see such a sad story as the one Dicky lives, it makes me

want

to terminate my play. The desire to play alongside such pathetic
addicts as well as the ultra-low-class of video poker's mainstream
players, i.e., "Life's Leftovers" has prompted me to think about it
between now and Jan.

A little insight here. I wonder if Rob got caught in some fools'
endeaver and is really heading to prison. Wouldn't suprise me for
someone who was claiming identity theft as a hobby.

I'll be terminating as soon as i send this, but I'm sure the geek
will be compelled to write something anyway in order that he clear
his mind of the truths I've presented about him. What's a geek
without self-confidence building??

Just trying to keep the record straight. Robese was hoping that by
writing these words I would not reply. As happened so many times, he
was wrong.

And don't forget who the "Man of the Year" was named this weekend:
That's right--GWB!!!

History will be the final word ... Check back in a few years.

With tail firmly tucked between his legs, the "legend in his own
mind" departs. He will not be missed.

All I can say now is Happy Holidays to all. I know it will be
brighter for many advantage players.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "deadin7" <deadin7@y...> wrote: