> Ha! A guy like you doing the weight bench! Who spots for
you....the old lady next door!!?
I don't do the heavy weights. I use weights for muscle tone and
general fitness.
Then you're saying you can bench press that withering old lady.
--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...> wrote:
--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...>
wrote:
> > -----------------------------------------------------------
> > I'll let you know right up front that you are as chicken about
> > making bets with me & then backing out of them after I up the
ante
> > as all vp 'advantage players' have been with me. Welcome to the
> > group of losers and cowards! Don't bother saying anything else
> > unless it's "Yes, Rob, I will bet you the $700k--fully knowing
that
> > I'm the only one here who can walk away with the other guy's
money
> > because if I lose that means I don't really have the money to
pay
> > you anyway!! How pathetic.
> > -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Good try monkey boy, but everyone already knows you've reneged on
the 200K bet and would do EXACTLY the same on a 700K bet. You're
immense ego is trying to find a place to hide. Good Luck.What a sissy's way out you take. You've got a chance at a one-way
bet, and all you have to do is show what a BIG man you are, and you
scamper away once again in the face of a strong opponent. Reminds
me
of what Dancer did. Instead of that geek conjecture, why don't you
just give it a go? You've got nothing to lose and everything to
gain?.
It's clear to everyone who the coward is monkey boy. Didn't I name
you the Princess of Cowards for similar acctions in the past. I doubt
you even have 200K to bet. Your approach is to continue to raise the
ante whenever anyone challenges you. I've stood my ground but you
waver at every turn. And, I see below you've finally RENEGEd. Who's
the "sissy" now?
>
> > > Not the "sole result" moron, there's always other parameters
as
> > well.
> >
> > Hold it! One more fine example of the Dick trying to look
> > intelligent but mysteriously leaves out all the 'other'
parameters.
>
> When doing market analysis, oh immense moron, there are always
> parameters unique to a given industry. Pick an industry and we
can
> discuss potential factors.
That's baloney and you SHOULD know it. Market analysis is
determined
by a common set of parameters across business, and if you don't
know
them you are full of it. So let's have them, genius.
This really demonstates that there is no way you could ever have an
MBA. For example, when selling large computers the manufacturers
could care less about individual buying trends and would never factor
in TV advertising for sales. On the other hand a company selling PCs
would.
>
> > Where's your intellect again? $200k is peanuts compared to
$700k.
>
> Still not peanuts, bigL.Then that confirms my suspicion of just how low class you really
are.
I guess if the belief that $200K is REAL money makes one low class
then I definitely fit the classification ... along with >99.9999% of
the rest of the population. I know that includes you too, but your
immense ego makes you write idiotic statements like the one above.
>
> Are you willing to go ahead with the 200K bet now, or is your
RENEGE still in force??? I'll show up there with my 200K just as
soon as you give the word.How's this? I RENEGE on the $200k bet in favor of the $700k bet.
It's
now or never, peanut boy.
Well, finally the monkey boy admits he can't come up with the $200K.
I accept your RENEGE as proof that your word is worthless. Now,
explain to me why I would now trust your $700K bet? Obviously, I'm
not going to go out of my way. So, I will provide evidence I have
OVER $700K but will never turn it into cash when dealing with a
proven reneger.
--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "deadin7" <deadin7@y...> wrote:
> > > -----------------------------------------------------------
> > > I'll let you know right up front that you are as chicken
about
> > > making bets with me & then backing out of them after I up the
> ante
> > > as all vp 'advantage players' have been with me. Welcome to
the
> > > group of losers and cowards! Don't bother saying anything
else
> > > unless it's "Yes, Rob, I will bet you the $700k--fully
knowing
> that
> > > I'm the only one here who can walk away with the other guy's
> money
> > > because if I lose that means I don't really have the money to
pay
> > > you anyway!! How pathetic.
> > > -----------------------------------------------------------
> What a sissy's way out you take. You've got a chance at a one-way
> bet, and all you have to do is show what a BIG man you are, and
you scamper away once again in the face of a strong opponent. Reminds
me of what Dancer did. Instead of that geek conjecture, why don't
you just give it a go? You've got nothing to lose and everything to
gain?.
It's clear to everyone who the coward is monkey boy. Didn't I name
you the Princess of Cowards for similar acctions in the past. I
doubt you even have 200K to bet. Your approach is to continue to
raise the ante whenever anyone challenges you. I've stood my ground
but you waver at every turn. And, I see below you've finally RENEGEd.
Who's the "sissy" now?
Instead of trying to cry your way out, why don't you explain to
everyone why you just don't go for the $700k bet you said you have
(haha!) which is truky a one-way bet. Raising the ante is a way to
tell you that your amount isn't worth my time. Maybe you don't get
it. If you call standing your ground sticking to a $200k bet when you
make believe that you really do have the $700k, then you have just
set your credibility below ZERO!
> That's baloney and you SHOULD know it. Market analysis is
determined by a common set of parameters across business, and if
you don't know them you are full of it. So let's have them, genius.
This really demonstates that there is no way you could ever have an
MBA. For example, when selling large computers the manufacturers
could care less about individual buying trends and would never
factor in TV advertising for sales. On the other hand a company
selling PCs would.
Well, it's my fault for saying "and you should know it". From your
repititious inexperience as shown above, how in the world could I
have thought that a slide-rule geek programmer would EVER know
anything about marketing? The way you break down the parameters into
tiny segments depicts you as reaching for straws when it comes to an
explanation. You are so feeble it's almost as funny as your trying to
talk reason in video poker.
> How's this? I RENEGE on the $200k bet in favor of the $700k bet.
It's now or never, peanut boy.Well, finally the monkey boy admits he can't come up with the
$200K. I accept your RENEGE as proof that your word is worthless.
Now, explain to me why I would now trust your $700K bet? Obviously,
I'm not going to go out of my way. So, I will provide evidence I have
OVER $700K but will never turn it into cash when dealing with a
proven reneger.
You either have what it takes or you don't. It's abundantly clear you
haven't more than a few pennies to rub together, or else you'd have
said "OK, You're on" with $700k. You aren't very good when it comes
to faking it. And you aren't very bright when it comes to common
sense.
--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...> wrote:
--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...>
wrote:
>
> > > > -----------------------------------------------------------
> > > > I'll let you know right up front that you are as chicken
about
> > > > making bets with me & then backing out of them after I up
the
> > ante
> > > > as all vp 'advantage players' have been with me. Welcome to
the
> > > > group of losers and cowards! Don't bother saying anything
else
> > > > unless it's "Yes, Rob, I will bet you the $700k--fully
knowing
> > that
> > > > I'm the only one here who can walk away with the other
guy's
> > money
> > > > because if I lose that means I don't really have the money
to
> pay
> > > > you anyway!! How pathetic.
> > > > -----------------------------------------------------------
> > What a sissy's way out you take. You've got a chance at a one-
way
> > bet, and all you have to do is show what a BIG man you are, and
you scamper away once again in the face of a strong opponent.
Reminds
> me of what Dancer did. Instead of that geek conjecture, why don't
you just give it a go? You've got nothing to lose and everything to
> gain?.
>
> It's clear to everyone who the coward is monkey boy. Didn't I
name
> you the Princess of Cowards for similar acctions in the past. I
doubt you even have 200K to bet. Your approach is to continue to
raise the ante whenever anyone challenges you. I've stood my ground
but you waver at every turn. And, I see below you've finally
RENEGEd.
Who's the "sissy" now?
Instead of trying to cry your way out, why don't you explain to
everyone why you just don't go for the $700k bet you said you have
(haha!) which is truky a one-way bet. Raising the ante is a way to
tell you that your amount isn't worth my time. Maybe you don't get
it. If you call standing your ground sticking to a $200k bet when
you
make believe that you really do have the $700k, then you have just
set your credibility below ZERO!
Translation. I was right. He doesn't even have $200K. Did you ever
hear so much retreating in all your life. The Princess of Cowards has
returned in full bloom.
>
> > That's baloney and you SHOULD know it. Market analysis is
> determined by a common set of parameters across business, and if
you don't know them you are full of it. So let's have them, genius.
>
> This really demonstates that there is no way you could ever have
an
> MBA. For example, when selling large computers the manufacturers
> could care less about individual buying trends and would never
factor in TV advertising for sales. On the other hand a company
selling PCs would.Well, it's my fault for saying "and you should know it". From your
repititious inexperience as shown above, how in the world could I
have thought that a slide-rule geek programmer would EVER know
anything about marketing? The way you break down the parameters
into
tiny segments depicts you as reaching for straws when it comes to
an
explanation. You are so feeble it's almost as funny as your trying
to
talk reason in video poker.
Translation. I was right. I gave a perfectly good example and monkey
boys' immense ego won't let him admit he was wrong, AGAIN. THis is
exactly like his VP system. I prove beyond any doubt that it doesn't
work and his ego takes over and he can't admit the TRUTH.
>
> > How's this? I RENEGE on the $200k bet in favor of the $700k
bet.
> It's now or never, peanut boy.
>
> Well, finally the monkey boy admits he can't come up with the
$200K. I accept your RENEGE as proof that your word is worthless.
Now, explain to me why I would now trust your $700K bet? Obviously,
I'm not going to go out of my way. So, I will provide evidence I
have
> OVER $700K but will never turn it into cash when dealing with a
> proven reneger.You either have what it takes or you don't. It's abundantly clear
you
haven't more than a few pennies to rub together, or else you'd have
said "OK, You're on" with $700k. You aren't very good when it comes
to faking it. And you aren't very bright when it comes to common
sense.
Wrong again, Princess. If I said OK then you'd raise the ante to a
higher amount. Been there done that! Like I said, I can prove I have
the $700K, but with your track record all you'll ever see is the
EVIDENCE. Why should I incur penalties, etc. turning it into cash
when you'll back out in the end, just like you always have.
--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "deadin7" <deadin7@y...> wrote:
> > > > > ----------------------------------------------------------
-> > > > > > I'll let you know right up front that you are as chicken
> about making bets with me & then backing out of them after I up
the ante as all vp 'advantage players' have been with me. Welcome
to the group of losers and cowards! Don't bother saying anything
else unless it's "Yes, Rob, I will bet you the $700k--fully
knowing that I'm the only one here who can walk away with the other
guy's money because if I lose that means I don't really have the
money to pay you anyway!! How pathetic.
--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...> wrote:
> > > > > ----------------------------------------------------------
-
> > > What a sissy's way out you take. You've got a chance at a one-
way
> > > bet, and all you have to do is show what a BIG man you are,
and
> you scamper away once again in the face of a strong opponent.
Reminds
> > me of what Dancer did. Instead of that geek conjecture, why
don't
> you just give it a go? You've got nothing to lose and everything
to
> > gain?.
> Instead of trying to cry your way out, why don't you explain to
> everyone why you just don't go for the $700k bet you said you
have (haha!) which is truky a one-way bet. Raising the ante is a way
to tell you that your amount isn't worth my time. Maybe you don't get
it. If you call standing your ground sticking to a $200k bet when
you make believe that you really do have the $700k, then you have
just set your credibility below ZERO!
Translation. I was right. He doesn't even have $200K. Did you ever
hear so much retreating in all your life. The Princess of Cowards
has returned in full bloom.
Truth: You've blabbed endlessly how you have "over $700,000 in
investments that you can turn into cash". So I give you the
opportunity of a lifetime to show me that money instead of just $200k
and you win $700k. Who in their right mind wouldn't take that kind of
an up-ante?? You know what that shows about you, do you not?
> Well, it's my fault for saying "and you should know it". From
your repititious inexperience as shown above, how in the world could
I have thought that a slide-rule geek programmer would EVER know
> anything about marketing? The way you break down the parameters
into tiny segments depicts you as reaching for straws when it comes
to an explanation. You are so feeble it's almost as funny as your
trying to talk reason in video poker.
Translation. I was right. I gave a perfectly good example and
monkey boys' immense ego won't let him admit he was wrong, AGAIN.
THis is exactly like his VP system. I prove beyond any doubt that it
doesn't work and his ego takes over and he can't admit the TRUTH.
Truth: Dicky wet his pants on this one....and I don't mean from one
of his video poker-playing wet dreams. His big problem is he's not
dealing with another moronic geek from his working past, and now he
has to support his mythical statements within an accountability
factor that he's really not even close to being used to doing. I'm
sorry, but you do look stupid here once again.
> You either have what it takes or you don't. It's abundantly clear
you haven't more than a few pennies to rub together, or else you'd
have said "OK, You're on" with $700k. You aren't very good when it
comes to faking it. And you aren't very bright when it comes to
common sense.
Wrong again, Princess. If I said OK then you'd raise the ante to a
higher amount. Been there done that! Like I said, I can prove I
have the $700K,
THEN LET"S DO IT AND STOP WITH ALL THE WIMPERING!!!!!
but with your track record all you'll ever see is the
EVIDENCE. Why should I incur penalties, etc. turning it into cash
when you'll back out in the end, just like you always have.
AND STOP WITH ALL THE WHINING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! What a big baby you
are!!!
--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...>
wrote:
--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "deadin7" <deadin7@y...> wrote:
>
> > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------
--
-> > > > > > I'll let you know right up front that you are as
chicken
> > about making bets with me & then backing out of them after I up
> the ante as all vp 'advantage players' have been with me. Welcome
to the group of losers and cowards! Don't bother saying anything
> else unless it's "Yes, Rob, I will bet you the $700k--fully
> knowing that I'm the only one here who can walk away with the
other
> guy's money because if I lose that means I don't really have the
money to pay you anyway!! How pathetic.
> > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------
--
-
> > > > What a sissy's way out you take. You've got a chance at a
one-
> way
> > > > bet, and all you have to do is show what a BIG man you are,
and
> > you scamper away once again in the face of a strong opponent.
> Reminds
> > > me of what Dancer did. Instead of that geek conjecture, why
don't
> > you just give it a go? You've got nothing to lose and
everything
to
> > > gain?.> > Instead of trying to cry your way out, why don't you explain to
> > everyone why you just don't go for the $700k bet you said you
have (haha!) which is truky a one-way bet. Raising the ante is a
way
to tell you that your amount isn't worth my time. Maybe you don't
get
> it. If you call standing your ground sticking to a $200k bet when
> you make believe that you really do have the $700k, then you have
just set your credibility below ZERO!
>
> Translation. I was right. He doesn't even have $200K. Did you
ever
> hear so much retreating in all your life. The Princess of Cowards
has returned in full bloom.Truth: You've blabbed endlessly how you have "over $700,000 in
investments that you can turn into cash".
Not my words. If you're going to use quotes do so correctly. This is
a LIE, pure and simple. Now you know why I call you a liar.
Now, I do have well over 700K in investments. Turning them into cash
would not be easy nor intelligent on my part because of taxes,
penalties, etc. However, I'm more than willing to show you absolute
proof that I have the investments. It really doesn't matter anyway
since you will renege in some manner or form just like the 200K bet.
>
> > Well, it's my fault for saying "and you should know it". From
your repititious inexperience as shown above, how in the world
could
I have thought that a slide-rule geek programmer would EVER know
> > anything about marketing? The way you break down the parameters
> into tiny segments depicts you as reaching for straws when it
comes
to an explanation. You are so feeble it's almost as funny as your
trying to talk reason in video poker.
>
> Translation. I was right. I gave a perfectly good example and
monkey boys' immense ego won't let him admit he was wrong, AGAIN.
THis is exactly like his VP system. I prove beyond any doubt that
it
doesn't work and his ego takes over and he can't admit the TRUTH.
Truth: Dicky wet his pants on this one....and I don't mean from one
of his video poker-playing wet dreams. His big problem is he's not
dealing with another moronic geek from his working past, and now he
has to support his mythical statements within an accountability
factor that he's really not even close to being used to doing. I'm
sorry, but you do look stupid here once again.
Lots of words ... no content. I gave you a solid example that proved
you were wrong. There are many other examples where marketing plans
require different approaches: advertising medium (TV, newsprint,
radio, internet, etc.), regional vs. national, new brand vs. old
brand. The list goes on and on and shows once more that you haven't a
clue on this and many other topics but your ego will never let you
admit it.
>
> > You either have what it takes or you don't. It's abundantly
clear
> you haven't more than a few pennies to rub together, or else
you'd
have said "OK, You're on" with $700k. You aren't very good when it
comes to faking it. And you aren't very bright when it comes to
common sense.
>
> Wrong again, Princess. If I said OK then you'd raise the ante to
a
> higher amount. Been there done that! Like I said, I can prove I
have the $700K,THEN LET"S DO IT AND STOP WITH ALL THE WIMPERING!!!!!
You already wimpered out of the 200K bet. But, as I said above I can
show you proof of 700K which is what you initially bet I didn't have.
If I show you the proof that should be sufficient.
Calmly awaiting RENEGE #2.
> -> > > > > > I'll let you know right up front that you are as
chicken
> > > about making bets with me & then backing out of them after I
up
> > the ante as all vp 'advantage players' have been with me.
Welcome
> to the group of losers and cowards! Don't bother saying anything
> > else unless it's "Yes, Rob, I will bet you the $700k--fully
> > knowing that I'm the only one here who can walk away with the
other
> > guy's money because if I lose that means I don't really have
the
> money to pay you anyway!! How pathetic.
> Truth: Dicky wet his pants on this one....and I don't mean from
one of his video poker-playing wet dreams. His big problem is he's
not dealing with another moronic geek from his working past, and now
he has to support his mythical statements within an accountability
> factor that he's really not even close to being used to doing.
I'm sorry, but you do look stupid here once again.
Lots of words ... no content. I gave you a solid example that
proved
you were wrong. There are many other examples where marketing plans
require different approaches: advertising medium (TV, newsprint,
radio, internet, etc.), regional vs. national, new brand vs. old
brand. The list goes on and on and shows once more that you haven't
a clue on this and many other topics but your ego will never let you
admit it.
There's that wordy nervousness once again, rambling on and on without
substance as usual. Did you just get back in from the casinos after
another losing session??
> >
> THEN LET"S DO IT AND STOP WITH ALL THE WIMPERING!!!!!You already wimpered out of the 200K bet. But, as I said above I
can show you proof of 700K which is what you initially bet I didn't
have. If I show you the proof that should be sufficient.
In the world of betting, if someone believes they can win a bet with
$200k and are raised to $700k on the same exact bet, unless they're
lying they always accept the raise. And what's all this "I can show
you proof" nonsense? Show me the cash. You're whining and crying
about paying "withdrawal penalties" when you can win $700k??? And
your excuse--you don't believe I'll pay you. HAHAHA! You never
intended to make a bet in the first place. You haven't the courage
nor the cash, so why not admit it on both counts right here and save
face for a change?
--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...> wrote:
--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...>
wrote:
> Lots of words ... no content. I gave you a solid example that
proved
> you were wrong. There are many other examples where marketing
plans
> require different approaches: advertising medium (TV, newsprint,
> radio, internet, etc.), regional vs. national, new brand vs. old
> brand. The list goes on and on and shows once more that you
haven't
a clue on this and many other topics but your ego will never let
you
> admit it.
>
There's that wordy nervousness once again, rambling on and on
without
substance as usual. Did you just get back in from the casinos after
another losing session??
> > >
> > THEN LET"S DO IT AND STOP WITH ALL THE WIMPERING!!!!!
>
> You already wimpered out of the 200K bet. But, as I said above I
can show you proof of 700K which is what you initially bet I didn't
have. If I show you the proof that should be sufficient.
>
In the world of betting, if someone believes they can win a bet
with
$200k and are raised to $700k on the same exact bet, unless they're
lying they always accept the raise.
"The world of betting". Where did you come up this this idiotic term?
And what's all this "I can show
you proof" nonsense? Show me the cash.
OK, I can see you're reneging on this bet also. You claimed I didn't
have 700K. I can show you absolute proof that I have it. Now,
it's "show me the cash". I predicted you'd renege, now it starts ...
You're whining and crying
about paying "withdrawal penalties" when you can win $700k???
You'd never pay and I KNOW that. Your history of reneging is enough
evidence for me. So, either you accept my proof or crawl back into
your hole with another "renege" under your belt. So, what is it
monkey boy. You stated I didn't have 700K. Are you willing to back
that up?
--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "deadin7" <deadin7@y...> wrote:
> > > THEN LET"S DO IT AND STOP WITH ALL THE WIMPERING!!!!!
> And what's all this "I can show
> you proof" nonsense? Show me the cash.OK, I can see you're reneging on this bet also. You claimed I
didn't
have 700K. I can show you absolute proof that I have it. Now,
it's "show me the cash". I predicted you'd renege, now it starts ...> You're whining and crying
> about paying "withdrawal penalties" when you can win $700k???You'd never pay and I KNOW that. Your history of reneging is enough
evidence for me. So, either you accept my proof or crawl back into
your hole with another "renege" under your belt. So, what is it
monkey boy. You stated I didn't have 700K. Are you willing to back
that up?
I only accept seeing CASH as proof, and not some theoretical
investment portfolio that may or may not ever be able to be turned
into cash. This isn't video poker where you can spoof many into
thinking you're successful by producing useless math models and dumb
probability theories instead of the CASH. It's the same as every
issue with you. You mouth off about something, then when you get
EVERY opportunity to produce proof, you peel another level off the
tree so you really don't have to do what you said.
--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...> wrote:
--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...>
wrote:
> > You're whining and crying
> > about paying "withdrawal penalties" when you can win $700k???
>
> You'd never pay and I KNOW that. Your history of reneging is
enough
> evidence for me. So, either you accept my proof or crawl back
into
> your hole with another "renege" under your belt. So, what is it
> monkey boy. You stated I didn't have 700K. Are you willing to
back
> that up?
I only accept seeing CASH as proof, and not some theoretical
investment portfolio that may or may not ever be able to be turned
into cash.
A clearly documented investment portfolio would be more than enough
evidence to get a loan, however, Robbie, the reneger, needs more
evidence than a bank or it's "theoretical". His attempts to renege
look more foolish by the minute. I'm beginning to really believe
Robbie doesn't even have the $200K yet alone $700K. It's time to
either back up your assertions or limp away with your tail between
your legs.
--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "deadin7" <deadin7@y...> wrote:
> > > You're whining and crying
> > > about paying "withdrawal penalties" when you can win $700k???
> >
> > You'd never pay and I KNOW that. Your history of reneging is
enough evidence for me. So, either you accept my proof or crawl
back into
> > your hole with another "renege" under your belt. So, what is it
> > monkey boy. You stated I didn't have 700K. Are you willing to
back that up?
>
> I only accept seeing CASH as proof, and not some theoretical
> investment portfolio that may or may not ever be able to be
turned into cash.
A clearly documented investment portfolio would be more than enough
evidence to get a loan, however, Robbie, the reneger, needs more
evidence than a bank or it's "theoretical". His attempts to renege
look more foolish by the minute. I'm beginning to really believe
Robbie doesn't even have the $200K yet alone $700K. It's time to
either back up your assertions or limp away with your tail between
your legs.
None of your nonsense will change the fact that you must show cash.
You've got so much time on your hands how could I not believe you'd
create a certified portfolio out of thin air. You're a desperate man,
Dicky. If you have the money show me. If not, don't keep weasel-
wording your way around it. And saying "but he won't pay me if I win"
is nothing more than a way to beg out. Do it. show what a man you are
in your declining years. Get SOME respect out of your sad, critical
life.
--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...> wrote:
--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...>
wrote:
>
> > > > You're whining and crying
> > > > about paying "withdrawal penalties" when you can win
$700k???
> > >
> > > You'd never pay and I KNOW that. Your history of reneging is
> enough evidence for me. So, either you accept my proof or crawl
back into
> > > your hole with another "renege" under your belt. So, what is
it
> > > monkey boy. You stated I didn't have 700K. Are you willing to
> back that up?
> >
> > I only accept seeing CASH as proof, and not some theoretical
> > investment portfolio that may or may not ever be able to be
turned into cash.
>
> A clearly documented investment portfolio would be more than
enough
> evidence to get a loan, however, Robbie, the reneger, needs more
> evidence than a bank or it's "theoretical". His attempts to
renege
> look more foolish by the minute. I'm beginning to really believe
> Robbie doesn't even have the $200K yet alone $700K. It's time to
> either back up your assertions or limp away with your tail
between
> your legs.
None of your nonsense will change the fact that you must show cash.
None of your nonsense will ever make me turn my investment portfolio
into cash just so you can renege AGAIN. So, if you're not willing to
back up your claim then admit you are once again reneging.
You've got so much time on your hands how could I not believe you'd
create a certified portfolio out of thin air.
You can go to the websites of some my well known investment
companies. I will sign on with my password and you can look over the
portfolios. Absolutely now way to create this out of "thin air". And,
for my LV real estate venture, I will show you the deed and
appraisals, we can even visit the property together if you like. More
than a bank would ever need. PS. I won't make you go through all of
my portfolio, just enough to reach 700K. So, Robbie, let's do it the
next time you're in LV. It's time to put up or shut up.
--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "deadin7" <deadin7@y...> wrote:
> > > I only accept seeing CASH as proof, and not some theoretical
> > > investment portfolio that may or may not ever be able to be
> turned into cash. None of your nonsense will change the fact that
you must show cash.
None of your nonsense will ever make me turn my investment
portfolio into cash just so you can renege AGAIN.
I'm not 'making' you do anything you don't want to do, Dicky. You
either have it or you don't, and you either show you have it or
continue to whimper. So you're worried about paying penalties?
HAHAHA!! What a major class A-1 SISSY!! I'll even pay those for you,
i'll fly you here, and I'll hire bodyguards for you when you are
here. But Noooooo....Dicky makes believe he has it with a bunch of
school-yard words, then figures a way not to have to do it by making
assumptions that I won't pay up if I lose. You're already a loser if
that's how you fabricate things.
You can go to the websites of some my well known investment
companies. I will sign on with my password and you can look over
the portfolios. Absolutely now way to create this out of "thin air".
And I thought you were an expert computer geek!! And all that other
nonsense you state below. Blah blah blah. The bet is to show CASH,
and not some portfolio that confirms your addiction to gambling.
And,
for my LV real estate venture, I will show you the deed and
appraisals, we can even visit the property together if you like.
More
than a bank would ever need. PS. I won't make you go through all of
my portfolio, just enough to reach 700K. So, Robbie, let's do it
the
--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...> wrote:
next time you're in LV. It's time to put up or shut up.
--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...>
wrote:
>
> > > > I only accept seeing CASH as proof, and not some
theoretical
> > > > investment portfolio that may or may not ever be able to be
> > turned into cash. None of your nonsense will change the fact
that
you must show cash.
>
> None of your nonsense will ever make me turn my investment
portfolio into cash just so you can renege AGAIN.I'm not 'making' you do anything you don't want to do, Dicky. You
either have it or you don't,
Yep. I have it. ALl you have to do is look.
and you either show you have it or
continue to whimper. So you're worried about paying penalties?
HAHAHA!! What a major class A-1 SISSY!! I'll even pay those for
you,
i'll fly you here, and I'll hire bodyguards for you when you are
here.
If you think anyone with a brain believes this BS you're only kidding
yourself. Your attempt at monkey boy bravado does nothing to hide
that fact that you can EASILY find out if I have the money IF YOU
WANTED TO. The ONLY reason why you're running off at the mouth is to
HIDE the fact that you KNOW you will lose and you're completely
terrified at the prospect. You are such a poor loser.
But Noooooo....Dicky makes believe he has it with a bunch of
school-yard words, then figures a way not to have to do it by
making
assumptions that I won't pay up if I lose. You're already a loser
if
that's how you fabricate things.
You wouldn't pay and you know it, monkey boy. Your lying words are
simply the first step in your NEXT renege.
> You can go to the websites of some my well known investment
> companies. I will sign on with my password and you can look over
the portfolios. Absolutely now way to create this out of "thin air".And I thought you were an expert computer geek!! And all that other
nonsense you state below. Blah blah blah. The bet is to show CASH,
and not some portfolio that confirms your addiction to gambling.
No, that wasn't the bet. IT's HOW you attempt to renege when you know
you have lost. It's completely obvious to everyone else, monkey boy.
You are such a poor loser.
Like I said before. It's time to put up or shut up.
--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "deadin7" <deadin7@y...> wrote:
> > None of your nonsense will ever make me turn my investment
> portfolio into cash just so you can renege AGAIN.
>
> I'm not 'making' you do anything you don't want to do, Dicky. You
> either have it or you don't,Yep. I have it. ALl you have to do is look.
"It" pertains to cash. Liquid assets. Real money. Cash is king. You
either have it to show me or you don't. I know you don't already. all
you're doing is pouring salt into your own wounds.
> and you either show you have it or
> continue to whimper. So you're worried about paying penalties?
> HAHAHA!! What a major class A-1 SISSY!! I'll even pay those for
you, i'll fly you here, and I'll hire bodyguards for you when you
are here.
If you think anyone with a brain believes this BS you're only
kidding yourself. Your attempt at monkey boy bravado does nothing to
hide that fact that you can EASILY find out if I have the money IF
YOU WANTED TO. The ONLY reason why you're running off at the mouth is
to HIDE the fact that you KNOW you will lose and you're completely
terrified at the prospect. You are such a poor loser.
If you know I will lose then why are you hiding behind mommy's skirt
on this??? Huh Pee Wee Dicky??? You and your 'penalties' hahahahaha!
With all that 'money' one would think a 'penalty' wouldn't matter.
That's why you're a fraud and make-believe you have it when you
don't. show me. go ahead. Make your day.
> But Noooooo....Dicky makes believe he has it with a bunch of
> school-yard words, then figures a way not to have to do it by
making assumptions that I won't pay up if I lose. You're already a
loser if that's how you fabricate things.
You wouldn't pay and you know it, monkey boy. Your lying words are
simply the first step in your NEXT renege.
You're using that excuse as a way out, but your only way out is with
your tail between your legs. You're acting like such a baby chicken
on this issue. Be a real man instead of just an old man. Leave this
world someday knowing you left with at least SOME dignity.
> > You can go to the websites of some my well known investment
> > companies. I will sign on with my password and you can look
over the portfolios. Absolutely now way to create this out of "thin
air".
>
> And I thought you were an expert computer geek!! And all that
other nonsense you state below. Blah blah blah. The bet is to show
CASH, and not some portfolio that confirms your addiction to gambling.
No, that wasn't the bet. IT's HOW you attempt to renege when you
know you have lost. It's completely obvious to everyone else, monkey
boy. You are such a poor loser.
The bet was to show cash and only cash. You don't take a 'portfolio'
to LV and play with something so stupid as that, and you don't make a
paper-only bet with me either. Grow up for once in your life. Be a
man. Stop hiding from it all the time.
--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...> wrote:
Like I said before. It's time to put up or shut up.
--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...>
wrote:
>
> > > None of your nonsense will ever make me turn my investment
> > portfolio into cash just so you can renege AGAIN.
> >
> > I'm not 'making' you do anything you don't want to do, Dicky.
You
> > either have it or you don't,
>
> Yep. I have it. ALl you have to do is look."It" pertains to cash. Liquid assets. Real money. Cash is king. You
either have it to show me or you don't.
No, in this day and age you must invest your assets or they will
dimish with time. If you'd ever grow up from your HS daydreams you'd
have a chance of understanding this fact.
>
> > and you either show you have it or
> > continue to whimper. So you're worried about paying penalties?
> > HAHAHA!! What a major class A-1 SISSY!! I'll even pay those for
> you, i'll fly you here, and I'll hire bodyguards for you when you
are here.
>
> If you think anyone with a brain believes this BS you're only
kidding yourself. Your attempt at monkey boy bravado does nothing
to
hide that fact that you can EASILY find out if I have the money IF
YOU WANTED TO. The ONLY reason why you're running off at the mouth
is
to HIDE the fact that you KNOW you will lose and you're completely
> terrified at the prospect. You are such a poor loser.If you know I will lose then why are you hiding behind mommy's
skirt
on this??? Huh Pee Wee Dicky??? You and your 'penalties'
hahahahaha!
Your 3rd grade intellectual display does nothing to change the fact
you stated I didn't have the money. I do, and now you're running
scared. It's so obvious to everyone. But hey, keep it up ... You look
like such a fool.
With all that 'money' one would think a 'penalty' wouldn't matter.
That's why you're a fraud and make-believe you have it when you
don't. show me. go ahead. Make your day.
The penalty wouldn't matter if I thought for one nanosecond that
you'd pay up. Of course, I know you wouldn't, so it would only cost
me money and, unlike you, I'm not a fool. In any event, I've taken
your challenge that I don't have 700K. If you want to see it all you
have to do is look.
>
> > But Noooooo....Dicky makes believe he has it with a bunch of
> > school-yard words,
Investments? Penalties? Taxes? These are considered "school yard
words" by the monkey boy. Need I say more...
OK, I will. Roth IRA, conventional IRA, mutual funds, stocks, bonds,
real estate, insurance. YES, these are all part of my "school yard"
vocabulary. Some day, when you grow up, you may actually understand
some of these terms.
then figures a way not to have to do it by
> making assumptions that I won't pay up if I lose. You're already
a
loser if that's how you fabricate things.
I'm still waiting for you to put up or shut up. I'll show you more
than enough proof. The ONLY reason you're putting up such a fuss is
that you somehow think you can bluff your way out. Won't work. Nobody
lives in a "cash" world anymore. Wake up.
>
> You wouldn't pay and you know it, monkey boy. Your lying words
are
> simply the first step in your NEXT renege.
You're using that excuse as a way out, but your only way out is
with
your tail between your legs. You're acting like such a baby chicken
on this issue. Be a real man instead of just an old man. Leave this
world someday knowing you left with at least SOME dignity.
The bluffing continues ... Put up or shut up, monkey boy. I have the
money and I will show you PROOF anytime you want. I'll take my
notebook computer with me and we can meet anywhere you want. How
about Laughlin or LV or Reno or Lake Tahoe? Anytime ... Anywhere.
>
> > > You can go to the websites of some my well known investment
> > > companies. I will sign on with my password and you can look
over the portfolios. Absolutely now way to create this out of "thin
air".
> >
> > And I thought you were an expert computer geek!! And all that
other nonsense you state below. Blah blah blah. The bet is to show
CASH, and not some portfolio that confirms your addiction to
gambling.
>
> No, that wasn't the bet. IT's HOW you attempt to renege when you
know you have lost. It's completely obvious to everyone else,
monkey
boy. You are such a poor loser.
The bet was to show cash and only cash.
No, that wasn't YOUR challenge. You stated I didn't have $700K.
Period. Either put up or shut up.
You don't take a 'portfolio'
to LV and play with something so stupid as that,
Actually, casinos will give you markers. So, in fact, you can play
with it.
and you don't make a
paper-only bet with me either. Grow up for once in your life. Be a
man. Stop hiding from it all the time.
I have met the terms of your ORIGINAL challenge. Either put up or
shut up.
--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "deadin7" <deadin7@y...> wrote:
> > > > None of your nonsense will ever make me turn my investment
> > > portfolio into cash just so you can renege AGAIN.
> > >
> > > I'm not 'making' you do anything you don't want to do, Dicky.
You either have it or you don't,
> >
> > Yep. I have it. ALl you have to do is look.
>
> "It" pertains to cash. Liquid assets. Real money. Cash is king.
You either have it to show me or you don't.
No, in this day and age you must invest your assets or they will
dimish with time. If you'd ever grow up from your HS daydreams
you'd have a chance of understanding this fact.
Duh, no one's telling you to stop whatever puny investments you do
have. Take 'em out, turn them into cash, show me, and put them back
in. Please....NO MORE FEEBLE EXCUSES!!!!!!!!!!!! You look so weak and
stupid....not to say broke.
> If you know I will lose then why are you hiding behind mommy's
skirt on this??? Huh Pee Wee Dicky??? You and your 'penalties'
hahahahaha!Your 3rd grade intellectual display does nothing to change the fact
you stated I didn't have the money. I do, and now you're running
scared. It's so obvious to everyone. But hey, keep it up ... You
look like such a fool.
THEN SHOW ME THE MONEY!!! If you have it!!!!!
> With all that 'money' one would think a 'penalty' wouldn't
matter.
> That's why you're a fraud and make-believe you have it when you
> don't. show me. go ahead. Make your day.The penalty wouldn't matter if I thought for one nanosecond that
you'd pay up.
The number one killer of geeks--THINKING. And you're pretending to do
it again.
Of course, I know you wouldn't, so it would only cost
me money and, unlike you, I'm not a fool. In any event, I've taken
your challenge that I don't have 700K. If you want to see it all
you have to do is look.
Looks like an easy way out, don't you say?? You're saying you have
it, I'm saying you're a big fat liar (in more ways than one!), I'm
also saying if you show it to me here in town I'll match it for you,
and you say "But gee Rob, I have it, but I don't believe you'd pay
me, so I'm not going to show you". Hmmmm...........
The rest of your nonsense is up the same cowardly, lying alley. Show
me or show the rest what a fraud you are--living on SS and skimpy
retirement checks.
--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...> wrote:
--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...>
wrote:
>
> > > > > None of your nonsense will ever make me turn my
investment
> > > > portfolio into cash just so you can renege AGAIN.
> > > >
> > > > I'm not 'making' you do anything you don't want to do,
Dicky.
> You either have it or you don't,
> > >
> > > Yep. I have it. ALl you have to do is look.
> >
> > "It" pertains to cash. Liquid assets. Real money. Cash is king.
You either have it to show me or you don't.
>
> No, in this day and age you must invest your assets or they will
> dimish with time. If you'd ever grow up from your HS daydreams
you'd have a chance of understanding this fact.Duh, no one's telling you to stop whatever puny investments you do
have. Take 'em out, turn them into cash, show me, and put them back
in. Please....NO MORE FEEBLE EXCUSES!!!!!!!!!!!! You look so weak
and
stupid....not to say broke.
Not going to happen. You made a challenge. Either back it up or admit
that you are going to renege AGAIN. (as if there was any doubt)
>
> > If you know I will lose then why are you hiding behind mommy's
> skirt on this??? Huh Pee Wee Dicky??? You and your 'penalties'
> hahahahaha!
>
> Your 3rd grade intellectual display does nothing to change the
fact
> you stated I didn't have the money. I do, and now you're running
> scared. It's so obvious to everyone. But hey, keep it up ... You
look like such a fool.THEN SHOW ME THE MONEY!!! If you have it!!!!!
Anytime. I've offered several locations and you deleted them.
However, I have notebook, will travel. Send me your real name and
address and I can be there this month.
>
> > With all that 'money' one would think a 'penalty' wouldn't
matter.
> > That's why you're a fraud and make-believe you have it when you
> > don't. show me. go ahead. Make your day.
>
> The penalty wouldn't matter if I thought for one nanosecond that
> you'd pay up.The number one killer of geeks--THINKING. And you're pretending to
do
it again.
I have the proof. Do you have the guts to back up your challenge or
are you going to run and hide again? The ball is in your court. Your
silly insistence on cash is tiring and an obvious ploy to avoid
losing the bet.
Of course, I know you wouldn't, so it would only cost
> me money and, unlike you, I'm not a fool. In any event, I've
taken
> your challenge that I don't have 700K. If you want to see it all
you have to do is look.Looks like an easy way out, don't you say?? You're saying you have
it, I'm saying you're a big fat liar (in more ways than one!), I'm
also saying if you show it to me here in town I'll match it for
you,
and you say "But gee Rob, I have it, but I don't believe you'd pay
me, so I'm not going to show you". Hmmmm...........
I've stated umpteen times that I'll show you. Your statement is
idiotic to say the least. Either put up or shut up.
The rest of your nonsense is up the same cowardly, lying alley.
Show
me or show the rest what a fraud you are--living on SS and skimpy
retirement checks.
No one believes your obvious attempts to avoid seeing that I really
have the money. You're like a trapped animal lashing out in all
directions but getting nowhere. Put up or shut up.
--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "deadin7" <deadin7@y...> wrote:
> > No, in this day and age you must invest your assets or they
will dimish with time. If you'd ever grow up from your HS daydreams
> you'd have a chance of understanding this fact.
>
> Duh, no one's telling you to stop whatever puny investments you
do have. Take 'em out, turn them into cash, show me, and put them
back in. Please....NO MORE FEEBLE EXCUSES!!!!!!!!!!!! You look so
weak and stupid....not to say broke.
Not going to happen. You made a challenge. Either back it up or
admit that you are going to renege AGAIN. (as if there was any doubt)
Um, the challenge was that you produce the cash. No amount of your
chicken-laced jibber-jabber will change that.
> >
> THEN SHOW ME THE MONEY!!! If you have it!!!!!Anytime. I've offered several locations and you deleted them.
However, I have notebook, will travel. Send me your real name and
address and I can be there this month.
Are we really getting somewhere now? You agree to show me cash?? If
so we have a deal!
> > > With all that 'money' one would think a 'penalty' wouldn't
> matter. That's why you're a fraud and make-believe you have it
when you don't. show me. go ahead. Make your day.
> >
> > The penalty wouldn't matter if I thought for one nanosecond
that you'd pay up.
>
> The number one killer of geeks--THINKING. And you're pretending
to do it again.
I have the proof. Do you have the guts to back up your challenge or
are you going to run and hide again? The ball is in your court.
Your silly insistence on cash is tiring and an obvious ploy to avoid
losing the bet.
I'm the one calling the shots and willing to pay if I'm wrong. So I
require to see CASH. Portfolios don't mean squat. I have a house on
the island of Hawaii that I have over $400k equity in, but it doesn't
mean a thing if I was required to show cash tomorrow. If you continue
to squirm and wiggle your way out of the bet then who will ever be
able to trust a nerd ever again?? At least try to save the butts of
your fellow geeks! And Stop embarrassing yourself.
> Of course, I know you wouldn't, so it would only cost
> > me money and, unlike you, I'm not a fool. In any event, I've
taken your challenge that I don't have 700K. If you want to see it
all you have to do is look.
>
> Looks like an easy way out, don't you say?? You're saying you
have it, I'm saying you're a big fat liar (in more ways than one!),
I'm also saying if you show it to me here in town I'll match it for
you, and you say "But gee Rob, I have it, but I don't believe you'd
pay me, so I'm not going to show you". Hmmmm...........
I've stated umpteen times that I'll show you. Your statement is
idiotic to say the least. Either put up or shut up.
then again, SHOW ME THE MONEY and stop pussyfooting around!!!
> The rest of your nonsense is up the same cowardly, lying alley.
Show me or show the rest what a fraud you are--living on SS and
skimpy retirement checks.
No one believes your obvious attempts to avoid seeing that I really
have the money. You're like a trapped animal lashing out in all
directions but getting nowhere. Put up or shut up.
Spoken just like a pathological gambler. "I really have the money" is
the cry. "I really win" is another. "I am not addicted & I don't feel
i play much, but I hit 11 RF's in 2 months and am up $7k in quarters"
is a third. Don't you yet realize how phony, stupid, and incredibly
foolish you appear here?
--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...> wrote:
Robbie, the monkey boy, Singer originally wrote:
" ... while I have $200k, you certainly don't."
I don't see any reference to cash. Then he followed it with:
"... And then we'll bet $500k that I DO have it. So that's a cool
$700k ... "
Still no reference to cash ... Now the monkey boy says:
Um, the challenge was that you produce the cash. No amount of your
chicken-laced jibber-jabber will change that.
Which of course make him a liar all over again. And then he also adds:
I'm the one calling the shots and willing to pay if I'm wrong. So I
require to see CASH. Portfolios don't mean squat. I have a house on
the island of Hawaii that I have over $400k equity in, but it
doesn't
mean a thing if I was required to show cash tomorrow. If you
continue
to squirm and wiggle your way out of the bet then who will ever be
able to trust a nerd ever again?? At least try to save the butts of
your fellow geeks! And Stop embarrassing yourself.
All this wordy gobbledegook in order to hide that fact that I've
proven him wrong again. Typical of a wannabee geek.
Rob, your challenge was that I didn't have the money and, in fact,
the challenge was that I didn't have $200K. However, it now appears
you MUST be admitting that I do have the money since you are
unwilling to look at my proof. I accept your renenge ... AGAIN. Makes
you look rather inept ... AGAIN, doesn't it?
Looking forward to more monkey boy bravado and lies ...