In a message dated 2/17/04 2:38:20 AM Central Standard Time,
harry.porter@verizon.net writes:
<< Dancer wrote this game up in Strictly Slots. This particular paytable
has an ER of 96.30%, with the "Dealt" paytable offering up a 96.63%
return and the "Draw" paytable 95.97%. >>
Only on the true Double Bet version he wrote about. I descibed a different
scenario.
Thanks for looking it up, tho. Interesting article.
Royals to ya.......K
harry.porter wrote:
<< Dancer wrote this game up in Strictly Slots. This particular
<< paytable
<< has an ER of 96.30%, with the "Dealt" paytable offering up a
<< 96.63% return and the "Draw" paytable 95.97%. >>
carbfree replied:
Only on the true Double Bet version he wrote about. I descibed a
different scenario.
Thanks for looking it up, tho. Interesting article.
Glad the article link was appreciated. I'm a little perplexed at the
"different scenario" you're referring to vs. the "true Double Bet"
version.
For starters, I was aware of only one version of Double Pay.
Second, the machine you describe in your original post -- 5-play
100-coin w/ 60,000 coin dealt RF -- sounds fully consistent with
Dancer's machine write-up, except with 20 coins bet per hand (10 on
the deal, 10 on the draw) rather than 10 per hand.
Is there something I missed that causes you to suggest you were
talking about a different beast where the math would be different?
- Harry