Double Pay Poker allows you to place a separate 5 coin bet on the dealt hand as well as your draw hand. Think of it as combining your favorite draw poker game with a stud game that has different payouts.
Clearly, one major appeal of Double Pay Poker is the quite rare instance of a dealt royal. The payout is impressive: 60,000 coins for max bet. Anybody is thrilled to get a 4000 coin dealt royal. But, I bet you'd be at least slightly more excited to get 15 times that normal payout (plus your usual 4000 coins per hand if the royal is on the bottom or center Spin Poker line).
Back to reality: getting there is half the fun (or challenge, I should say). Most of the Double Pay Poker games you see are badly shorted on the draw portion of the game. We all know that a 97% return makes it difficult to even survive, much less long enough to see a dealt royal on one of your hands. The word "unplayable" comes to mind.
But what about the "dealt" hand paytable? More bad news: Wizard of Odds shows those payouts generating about a 97% return as well.
Doesn't help much, does it?
So, I'm wondering if any of you has looked carefully enough at the "DEALT" hand paytable on Double Pay Poker to see if there are rare instances when that return is a bit better than the usual 97%. Perhaps there's a greater payout for a 4K. Or maybe there's some subtle other change that might help things a bit. I had always assumed "DEALT" paytables were pretty nuch standardized, but maybe I didn't take a close enough look.
Thanks,
Mikey