vpFREE2 Forums

Does anyone know how....

...to permanently block a specific person from being able to send to
your Yahoo! mailbox? Ever since my recent post regarding Team Nerd,
several members of the team have been sending me nasty e-mails full
of insults and other garbage, Evidently the truth hurts.

Anyway, I haven't gotten this much juvenile flaming in quite a
while, and I'd like to put a stop to it.

Also, can one post to VPFree without revealing one's e-mail address
at all?

This is not to say that a majority, or even a large portion, of the
stuff I get in my inbox is unpleasant; on the contrary, I've
received many amusing, encouraging, and friendly private posts. I
simply want to weed out the crap.

--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rockofjello333"
<rockofjello333@y...> wrote:
......... Ever since my recent post regarding Team Nerd,.........

Not recent post, but posts- I counted 5 such. You christened them
with a derogatory name and chastised their behavior in a public
forum, and yet they were gracious enough to waste their $80 per hour
time to respond to you. I only wish they would do so in this forum.

Rather than loathing them, some of us idolize teams and pros.

BTW, you are _supposed_ to lose $400 per hour playing $2 Deuces. A
loss of $940 in ten hours is cause to rejoice, not rant.

L.Wluiki

rockofjello333 wrote:

...to permanently block a specific person from being able to send to
your Yahoo! mailbox?

The easiest measure is to set up a filter to automatically direct any
mail from that person to your "Trash" folder.

- H.

--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rockofjello333" <rockofjello333@y...>
wrote:

...to permanently block a specific person from being able to send

to

your Yahoo! mailbox?

It's quite easy. Just go to the main Yahoo mail page and click
on "Mail Options", located at both the top and bottom right side of
the page. On the Mail Options page click on "Block Addresses". This
takes you to the Blocked Addresses page where you may enter up to 100
email addresses (or domains) you wish to block. After entering an
address, click on the "Add Block" button and it will be added to your
list of blocked addresses or domains.

                    <snip>

···

--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "lwluiki" <lwluiki@a...> wrote:

Rather than loathing them, some of us idolize teams and pros.

BTW, you are _supposed_ to lose $400 per hour playing $2 Deuces. A
loss of $940 in ten hours is cause to rejoice, not rant.

L.Wluiki

====================================

May I respectfully inquire what it is about vp

teams, that causes you to "idolize" them?

Is it because of their monopolization of, and subsequent pillaging
of advantage vp? Is it because when they have finished with their
24 hour tag-team play, the machines are then downgraded for the rest
of the non-team vp public. Is it because once they grab a bank of
good machines they shut all non-team players out? Or, are you
possibly a team member yourself? If so, I'd really appreciate
hearing your side of the story.

I ask these questions out of curiosity, with, I hope all due
courtesy. You are certainly entitled to your own ideas on this
subject.

BTW, I don't consider losing $940 a "cause to rejoice" whether the
loss occurs in a 10,20/40 or 60 hour session. I just can't get
really happy about losing no matter what the "expected loss" or time
frame may be.

As always, of course, we are all entitled to our opinions.

                  Babe

The email address used to make a post on vpFREE
cannot be faked or hidden.

vpFREE Administrator

···

On 26 Nov 2004 at 9:24, rockofjello333 wrote:

Also, can one post to VPFree without revealing one's
e-mail address at all?

--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rockofjello333"
<rockofjello333@y...> wrote:
......... Ever since my recent post regarding Team Nerd,.........

Not recent post, but posts- I counted 5 such. You christened them
with a derogatory name and chastised their behavior in a public
forum, and yet they were gracious enough to waste their $80 per

hour

time to respond to you.

Their responses were anything but gracious. I could quote some
specifics from their many e-mails, but I've already flushed them
down the virtual toilet.

I only wish they would do so in this forum.

I do, too, so they could get their juvenile, nasty asses barred from
this forum.

Rather than loathing them, some of us idolize teams and pros.

Some of you don't realize the vast harm that teams and pros have
done to the opportunities for visiting and recreational VP players.

BTW, you are _supposed_ to lose $400 per hour playing $2 Deuces. A
loss of $940 in ten hours is cause to rejoice, not rant.

Actually, what is "supposed" to happen is that LACKING DEUCES OR A
NATURAL ROYAL, you will "bleed" 40 bets/hour at FPDW. Since I got
the deuces at the end of this ten hours, your statistic does not
apply to my results. Besides, I merely reported my results COUPLED
with my observations of about sixty man-hours of play where NO
royals were hit by anyone and my set of deuces was the only one I
saw. (There were "supposed" to be about six sets of deuces in that
time.)

···

--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "lwluiki" <lwluiki@a...> wrote:

May I respectfully inquire what it is about vp
teams, that causes you to "idolize" them?
Is it because of their monopolization of, and subsequent pillaging
of advantage vp? Is it because when they have finished with their
24 hour tag-team play, the machines are then downgraded for the

rest

of the non-team vp public. Is it because once they grab a bank of
good machines they shut all non-team players out? Or, are you
possibly a team member yourself? If so, I'd really appreciate
hearing your side of the story.

I ask these questions out of curiosity, with, I hope all due
courtesy. You are certainly entitled to your own ideas on this
subject.

BTW, I don't consider losing $940 a "cause to rejoice" whether the
loss occurs in a 10,20/40 or 60 hour session. I just can't get
really happy about losing no matter what the "expected loss" or

time

···

--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "jackessiebabe" wrote:
frame may be.

As always, of course, we are all entitled to our opinions.

                  Babe

*********************************************************************

Thank you for your courteous and non-judgmental response. Please
bear with me: On pain of quoting myself (or even worse- quoting
myself quoting someone else). From vpFREE message #24334 of
Christmas Day, 2003:

No!/I am not a pro /nor was I meant to be/ Am an attendant lord, one
that will do/ To swell a progressive, start a scene or two/....
And (quoting Bob Dancer):
"Anyone who can make money playing video poker can make a lot more
money doing something else."
And (quoting The Queen Of Comps quoting Bob Dancer):
"…it's a hard way to make an easy living."

From the vpFREE Poll on Strategy, 35.65% of us play using near-
perfect strategies; thus a lot of us are parasites of the casinos.
To say that one is on higher moral grounds because he or she is a
smaller parasite than a pro or a team is at best a very weak
argument.

Finally, may be I'm just a low achiever, or may be it's because Dame
Fortune's been abusing me ever since I was a child, but I rejoice
every time I lose less than half a royal in a session, and playing
at $2, half a royal is $4K.

L.Wluiki

*********************************************************************

Thank you for your courteous and non-judgmental response. Please
bear with me: On pain of quoting myself (or even worse- quoting
myself quoting someone else). From vpFREE message #24334 of
Christmas Day, 2003:

No!/I am not a pro /nor was I meant to be/ Am an attendant lord,

one

that will do/ To swell a progressive, start a scene or two/....
And (quoting Bob Dancer):
"Anyone who can make money playing video poker can make a lot more
money doing something else."
And (quoting The Queen Of Comps quoting Bob Dancer):
"…it's a hard way to make an easy living."

From the vpFREE Poll on Strategy, 35.65% of us play using near-
perfect strategies; thus a lot of us are parasites of the casinos.
To say that one is on higher moral grounds because he or she is a
smaller parasite than a pro or a team is at best a very weak
argument.

Finally, may be I'm just a low achiever, or may be it's because

Dame

···

--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "lwluiki" <lwluiki@a...> wrote

Fortune's been abusing me ever since I was a child, but I rejoice
every time I lose less than half a royal in a session, and playing
at $2, half a royal is $4K.

L.Wluiki

*********************************************************************

Thank you as well, for your polite answers to the

questions I posed.

I'm sorry that Dame Fortune (or luck, or the "wrong side of
randomness") has not been kind to you more frequently. I hope that
this trend reverses itself quickly, and that, rather than "losing
half a royal", you manage to win an entire royal. It's amazing how
one's perspective changes when one is in the black column instead of
on the dreaded red side.

I TRY, sometimes with more success than at other times, to be as
objective as possible about the ideas of others. I know that our
thoughts and beliefs are shaped by our own personal experiences.
Since my life journey has been very different than yours (i.e. I
consider myself to be extremely fortunate in vp and in life) it's
understandable that our ideas reflect divergent opinions.

While I don't agree with, or understand, some of your reasoning, I
certainly defend your right, as well as the right of everyone else
on this board, to express your (or their) feelings. When this free-
flow exchange of ideas is done in a civilized and polite manner, I
do think we all get our points across more cogently.

My personal opinion still remains very much aligned with Rock's
expressed thoughts on team play; i.e. that the teams are basically
killing whatever "silver geese" (the gold ones are long gone) remain
for the rest of the recreational non-team. non-pro vp playimg
public.

Since I also believe that the ideal political climate would be to
live in a democracy (and, yes, I am perfectly aware that the BEST
country in the world, the USA is a Republic) it strikes me as unfair
that a few (IMO) greedy players can ruin it for the rest of us.

                Babe

Excellent point. Even those that don't play near-perfect strategy,
but play with *some* proper strategy are part of the problem.
Basically anyone who plays at a theoretical pace that's significantly
higher than the casino's target (which is typicaly 2-3% below EV) is
part of the problem. In this context, the "problem" is defined as
play that lowers the machine hold percentages, increasing the risk
that the casino will be forced to react and replace the machines with
more profitable ones.

It is true that some players are a bigger part of the problem than
others. Those that play the most coin-in on the good machines make
the biggest impact, and vise versa. But any of us who think we're NOT
part of the problem because we only visit Vegas a few weeks each year
are sadly mistaken. 1000 knowledgeable visitors playing 10 days per
year equates to 100 local "regulars" playing 100 days a year equates
to 20 local "pros" playing full-time. No matter which group you're
in, you're part of the problem, assuming you play even partially
correct strategy. It sort of like the old "people in glass houses"
idiom. Just because we may throw smaller stones than the pros doesn't
mean we're not gonna break any windows.

The real problem, IMHO, is propogation. The easier it is to get good
information (about good machines/promotions/benefits), the more this
will propogate, and the more we'll see our good plays disappear. Pros
are perhaps the biggest culprits on an individual basis, and are the
most visible. But it's possible that the bigger impact comes from the
much higher volume of local and visiting advantage players. We're all
to blame.

Perhaps the better way to look at it is to remember that we're all
competing with each other for a piece of the pie. The more people
there are to take pieces, the more the pie will disappear.

···

--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "lwluiki" <lwluiki@a...> wrote:

...
From the vpFREE Poll on Strategy, 35.65% of us play using near-
perfect strategies; thus a lot of us are parasites of the casinos.
To say that one is on higher moral grounds because he or she is a
smaller parasite than a pro or a team is at best a very weak
argument.

>
> ...
> From the vpFREE Poll on Strategy, 35.65% of us play using near-
> perfect strategies; thus a lot of us are parasites of the

casinos.

> To say that one is on higher moral grounds because he or she is a
> smaller parasite than a pro or a team is at best a very weak
> argument.
>

... <snipped>

The real problem, IMHO, is propogation. The easier it is to get

good

information (about good machines/promotions/benefits), the more this
will propogate, and the more we'll see our good plays disappear.

I thoroughly agree, and would respectfully point out that "Team Nerd"
and their analogs shared data concerning good plays amongst themselves
and played positive situations in exactly the same way for a very long
time (e.g., the Deuces Deluxe play at Harvey's; 6 1$ machines w/4700
royals yielding 100.7%). The teams included players who could play 2
machines at the same time... hardly subtle, yet the play remained.

The dissemination of information to a broad player base (e.g., this
site, Bob Dancer) is, I believe, far more damaging to "good plays"
than the likes of "Team Nerd" et al. That does not make this site a
prima facie bad thing, it's just another influence, as blackjack info
sites used to be, resulting in the 6/5-ing of single deck and extreme
anti-counting measures.

···

--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "VP Animal" <vpanimal@c...> wrote:

--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "lwluiki" <lwluiki@a...> wrote:

->>>>>>>>>>>>>Hi VP Animal,

I agree that there is validity to the points you both make.
However, of what possible use is FP VP, if we cannot, w/o threat of
having the play downgraded, apply proper strategy?

Where I'm afraid I have a difference of opinion with you, is in the
effect that the casual, recreational player has on the casino's
bottom line and actions, vs. their response to the pros and the tag-
team players. (By teams, I'm NOT referring to a few friends, out
for an evening of vp, who happen to be sitting at adjacent machines
for a few hours of fun and entertainment).

If tag teams tie up machines for endless hours, in the egregious way
that ROJ described in his Lake Tahoe post, this is bound to have a
deleterious effect on the casinos EV, on those particular machines,
probably causing a quick downgrade of the play.

On the other hand, recreational players (who most probably are
playing at considerably less than `100% accuracy, will take a break,
have a meal, stroll around the block to refresh themselves, and
generally not evoke anywhere near the response, from the suits, that
the team/pro will cause. IMO, even those skilled team players who
sacrifice perfect play for extreme speed, are still a much a greater
threat to the casino's bottom line, than the recreational player.

Fortunately, for me, teams and pro players can not able to squeeze
enough profit out of single line .25 vp. Therefore, I am still able
to plug away, many hours each day, at my game of choice.

For those of you that play higher denom. and multi-hands, you have
my sincere sympathy. I just have no clue as to what you can
possibly do to prevent the disappearance of FP machines.

                     Babe

>
> ...
> From the vpFREE Poll on Strategy, 35.65% of us play using near-
> perfect strategies; thus a lot of us are parasites of the

casinos.

> To say that one is on higher moral grounds because he or she is

a

> smaller parasite than a pro or a team is at best a very weak
> argument.
>

Excellent point. Even those that don't play near-perfect strategy,
but play with *some* proper strategy are part of the problem.
Basically anyone who plays at a theoretical pace that's

significantly

higher than the casino's target (which is typicaly 2-3% below EV)

is

part of the problem. In this context, the "problem" is defined as
play that lowers the machine hold percentages, increasing the risk
that the casino will be forced to react and replace the machines

with

more profitable ones.

It is true that some players are a bigger part of the problem than
others. Those that play the most coin-in on the good machines make
the biggest impact, and vise versa. But any of us who think we're

NOT

part of the problem because we only visit Vegas a few weeks each

year

are sadly mistaken. 1000 knowledgeable visitors playing 10 days

per

year equates to 100 local "regulars" playing 100 days a year

equates

to 20 local "pros" playing full-time. No matter which group you're
in, you're part of the problem, assuming you play even partially
correct strategy. It sort of like the old "people in glass houses"
idiom. Just because we may throw smaller stones than the pros

doesn't

mean we're not gonna break any windows.

The real problem, IMHO, is propogation. The easier it is to get

good

information (about good machines/promotions/benefits), the more

this

will propogate, and the more we'll see our good plays disappear.

Pros

are perhaps the biggest culprits on an individual basis, and are

the

most visible. But it's possible that the bigger impact comes from

the

much higher volume of local and visiting advantage players. We're

all

···

In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "VP Animal" <vpanimal@c...> wrote:

--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "lwluiki" <lwluiki@a...> wrote:
to blame.

Perhaps the better way to look at it is to remember that we're all
competing with each other for a piece of the pie. The more people
there are to take pieces, the more the pie will disappear.

Babe...

I agree with all of your points about pros, and particularly teams.
But I think you (and most people out there) underestimate the impact
of their own advantaged play. Can I, visiting 10-14 days per year to
Vegas, have any where near the impact a local pro (or team) can?
Certainly not. That's the way most people look at it.

The problem is there's thousands of us (advantage players). I'm not
talking just the subscribers to this list. There are other internet
lists, readers of Dancer/LVA/etc., and so on. I don't think I'm
exaggerating when I say the number of people in this country who know
at least passable VP strategy now numbers well into the thousands
(maybe tens of thousands).

We can put VP players into one of 3 categories: pros that play a ton
and make good money off the casinos, advantage players that know at
least some strategy and know to play high EV games, and clueless
players that play 2-3% (or more) below EV. Casinos clearly don't
profit from the first group, and after you add in
cashback/food/drinks/rooms/etc. they make litle or no money from the
second group. Virtually all their profit comes from the third group.
In that respect, we (the second group) are no more desirable to the
casinos than the pros.

What are the reasons that a casino might remove a high EV VP machine?
"Image" may very well be part of it... pros or teams hogging the
seats while desirable customers (those profitable to the casino)
cannot get to them. Overheard cell phone conversations, tag teaming,
etc. Management may get complaints, or perhaps they simply notice the
situation and decide to do something about it.

But I doubt a very large number of machines are removed due to bad
image. Most are removed because the hold percentages are too low, or
not enough volume. On the high percentage VP machines we don't need
to worry about not enough volume. They'll get plenty of play from
advantage players. So it comes down mostly to hold percentage.

That's where the thousands of advantage players make the biggest
impact. Not individually, but collectively. Too many advantaged
players armed with good information = shrinking machine holds.

What can we do now to slow the propagation? Obviously none of us is
going to start playing bad strategy just to raise machine holds. And
none of us want to give up any of our time on our favorite machines.
What then?

There are 2 ingredients needed to play advantage VP. One is general
knowledge about VP (knowing it can be beat, and knowing how to do it
via proper strategy). The other is knowledge of specific plays (where
the good machines/paytables exist, the good promotions, benefits,
etc.).

All of us here already know the general info, and that won't get
reversed. But we can think twice about promoting it to any NEW
players, which would simply continue the propagation. We do have a
little more control over the second part, chosing whether or not to
broadcast info that would help others to compete against us (maybe not
competing individually, but collectively).

VP Animal

--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "jackessiebabe" <jackessiebabe@y...>
wrote:

->>>>>>>>>>>>>Hi VP Animal,

I agree that there is validity to the points you both make.
However, of what possible use is FP VP, if we cannot, w/o threat of
having the play downgraded, apply proper strategy?

Where I'm afraid I have a difference of opinion with you, is in the
effect that the casual, recreational player has on the casino's
bottom line and actions, vs. their response to the pros and the tag-
team players. (By teams, I'm NOT referring to a few friends, out
for an evening of vp, who happen to be sitting at adjacent machines
for a few hours of fun and entertainment).

If tag teams tie up machines for endless hours, in the egregious

way

that ROJ described in his Lake Tahoe post, this is bound to have a
deleterious effect on the casinos EV, on those particular machines,
probably causing a quick downgrade of the play.

On the other hand, recreational players (who most probably are
playing at considerably less than `100% accuracy, will take a

break,

have a meal, stroll around the block to refresh themselves, and
generally not evoke anywhere near the response, from the suits,

that

the team/pro will cause. IMO, even those skilled team players who
sacrifice perfect play for extreme speed, are still a much a

greater

threat to the casino's bottom line, than the recreational player.

Fortunately, for me, teams and pro players can not able to squeeze
enough profit out of single line .25 vp. Therefore, I am still

able

···

to plug away, many hours each day, at my game of choice.

For those of you that play higher denom. and multi-hands, you have
my sincere sympathy. I just have no clue as to what you can
possibly do to prevent the disappearance of FP machines.

                     Babe

Vp Animal......

I think you make a very sad but important point. I can't

disagree with a a single premise you outline in this well thought
out post. It just seems very unfortunate to me, that while trying to
be kind and helpful to newbies (and each other) that we are quite
possibly doing ourselves in!

         Babe

···

===========================================

In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "VP Animal" <vpanimal@c.

                <snip>

All of us here already know the general info, and that won't get
reversed. But we can think twice about promoting it to any NEW
players, which would simply continue the propagation. We do have a
little more control over the second part, chosing whether or not to
broadcast info that would help others to compete against us (maybe

not

competing individually, but collectively).

VP Animal

>
>
>

Babe...

I share your "sad" feeling. For years I was a helper. It was simply
my nature to help other people with things, especially VP. And I know
I'm being a hypocrite now by keeping quiet some of the same type of
information that I learned from many of these same resources in the
past. But I've seen the damage firsthand that the propagation of
advantage VP players and easy information has wrought.

Let me clarify my final point when I talked about "broadcasting info
that would help others to compete against us". This is another
concept that isn't obvious on the surface. While we may not
frequently recognize other advantage players at the banks when we're
playing, make no mistake - we are competing with them. Everytime we
encourage more advantage players to play the machines we like to play,
it increases the total advantage play on them and lowers the machine
holds further. It doesn't matter if those people are there at the
same time we are (in the traditional "competing" sense).

VP Animal

--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "jackessiebabe" <jackessiebabe@y...>
wrote:

Vp Animal......

>>>>>>>>>I think you make a very sad but important point. I can't
disagree with a a single premise you outline in this well thought
out post. It just seems very unfortunate to me, that while trying

to

be kind and helpful to newbies (and each other) that we are quite
possibly doing ourselves in!

         Babe

In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "VP Animal" <vpanimal@c.

> <snip>

> All of us here already know the general info, and that won't get
> reversed. But we can think twice about promoting it to any NEW
> players, which would simply continue the propagation. We do have

a

> little more control over the second part, chosing whether or not

to

> broadcast info that would help others to compete against us

(maybe

···

not
> competing individually, but collectively).
>
> VP Animal
>

> >
> >
> >

It was posted on another site that there was a team on the $/2$FPDW a
couple of months ago at Tahoe. The casino changed the pay scale on
them and the team left. The casino put the full pay version back in
and the team came back and the casino caught them pulling their cards
and kicked them out of all Harrah's casino's. I don't know if this
is "Team Nerd", but what Harrah's did in this instance is good for
the casual VP player.

--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "jackessiebabe" <jackessiebabe@y...>
wrote:

->>>>>>>>>>>>>Hi VP Animal,

I agree that there is validity to the points you both make.
However, of what possible use is FP VP, if we cannot, w/o threat of
having the play downgraded, apply proper strategy?

Where I'm afraid I have a difference of opinion with you, is in the
effect that the casual, recreational player has on the casino's
bottom line and actions, vs. their response to the pros and the tag-
team players. (By teams, I'm NOT referring to a few friends, out
for an evening of vp, who happen to be sitting at adjacent machines
for a few hours of fun and entertainment).

If tag teams tie up machines for endless hours, in the egregious

way

that ROJ described in his Lake Tahoe post, this is bound to have a
deleterious effect on the casinos EV, on those particular machines,
probably causing a quick downgrade of the play.

On the other hand, recreational players (who most probably are
playing at considerably less than `100% accuracy, will take a

break,

have a meal, stroll around the block to refresh themselves, and
generally not evoke anywhere near the response, from the suits,

that

the team/pro will cause. IMO, even those skilled team players who
sacrifice perfect play for extreme speed, are still a much a

greater

threat to the casino's bottom line, than the recreational player.

Fortunately, for me, teams and pro players can not able to squeeze
enough profit out of single line .25 vp. Therefore, I am still

able

to plug away, many hours each day, at my game of choice.

For those of you that play higher denom. and multi-hands, you have
my sincere sympathy. I just have no clue as to what you can
possibly do to prevent the disappearance of FP machines.

                     Babe

>
> >
> > ...
> > From the vpFREE Poll on Strategy, 35.65% of us play using near-
> > perfect strategies; thus a lot of us are parasites of the
casinos.
> > To say that one is on higher moral grounds because he or she is
a
> > smaller parasite than a pro or a team is at best a very weak
> > argument.
> >
>
> Excellent point. Even those that don't play near-perfect

strategy,

> but play with *some* proper strategy are part of the problem.
> Basically anyone who plays at a theoretical pace that's
significantly
> higher than the casino's target (which is typicaly 2-3% below EV)
is
> part of the problem. In this context, the "problem" is defined as
> play that lowers the machine hold percentages, increasing the risk
> that the casino will be forced to react and replace the machines
with
> more profitable ones.
>
> It is true that some players are a bigger part of the problem than
> others. Those that play the most coin-in on the good machines

make

> the biggest impact, and vise versa. But any of us who think

we're

NOT
> part of the problem because we only visit Vegas a few weeks each
year
> are sadly mistaken. 1000 knowledgeable visitors playing 10 days
per
> year equates to 100 local "regulars" playing 100 days a year
equates
> to 20 local "pros" playing full-time. No matter which group

you're

> in, you're part of the problem, assuming you play even partially
> correct strategy. It sort of like the old "people in glass

houses"

> idiom. Just because we may throw smaller stones than the pros
doesn't
> mean we're not gonna break any windows.
>
> The real problem, IMHO, is propogation. The easier it is to get
good
> information (about good machines/promotions/benefits), the more
this
> will propogate, and the more we'll see our good plays disappear.
Pros
> are perhaps the biggest culprits on an individual basis, and are
the
> most visible. But it's possible that the bigger impact comes

from

the
> much higher volume of local and visiting advantage players.

We're

···

In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "VP Animal" <vpanimal@c...> wrote:
> --- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "lwluiki" <lwluiki@a...> wrote:
all
> to blame.
>
> Perhaps the better way to look at it is to remember that we're all
> competing with each other for a piece of the pie. The more people
> there are to take pieces, the more the pie will disappear.