I have to disagree. I would agree that some of the clueless know which are the better games or paytables, but certainly not the majority.
Just last week at Casino Niagara I spotted 2 banks of freestanding roulette machines.
These 2 banks were facing each other. One bank had machines with a single "0",
the other bank had "0" and "00". Each bank was being played and each bank had unused machines on them.
How many times I have seen people sit down to play and ask me how do these things work, too many to count.
How many times I have seen people sit at a multi game machine and play 8/5 jacks or better, when on that very machine exists 8/5 bonus poker, too many to count.
How about my favorites, people hitting Royal flushes, betting 4 coins when the max on the machine is 5 and getting a 1000 coin payout.
I could go on but I am a poor typist and it would take pages.
I rest my case.
Regards
A.P.
ยทยทยท
--- On Sat, 8/1/09, vpearlkc <EAtkinson@kc.rr.com> wrote:
From: vpearlkc <EAtkinson@kc.rr.com>
Subject: [vpFREE] Re: Do paytables really matter to 99% of VP players?
To: vpFREE@yahoogroups.com
Received: Saturday, August 1, 2009, 8:10 AM
I think even even a great number of the clueless can tell the difference between a 99.5% and 97.5% game. They will have more and larger wins on fullpay and they will get to play longer no matter what their skill level. After all a poor players 95% return on fullplay is still better then 93%. I'm sure they notice the difference.