In a message dated 11/20/2002 2:05:36 AM Pacific Standard Time,
vpFREE@yahoogroups.com writes:
I will say that this kind of data gathering is yet
another argument in favor of spreading your play around if
you play full time.The advantages of spreading your play around are numerous.
This seems like a good time to go ahead and delve into that
topic.If you only play 10-20K a month at any given casino, it
is going to take them a long time to get enough useful data to
realize you are a skilled player. Even if they don't do that,
you may regret being noticed as a regular player who seems to
come out ahead in the long run.Getting the 'top' mailers at a small number of places
has 2 drawbacks. First, the benefits at the top are rarely
as good. If we plot benefits as a function of coin in on an
x-y plane, the data in most casinos would form a curve that has
a negative derivative. In other words, it starts out fairly steep,
but tends to flatten out.The other problem is when one of your base casinos suddenly
decides to cut your benefits. This is usually just caused by
across the board cuts. A recent example is the Fiesta. Without
notice they stopped giving separate mailers for each casino.
For players at the top level at both, this was a nasty cut in
their monthly cash flow. They can move some of that play elsewhere
and restore their overall ER, but it takes 1-3 months to get
the new bounce back money from another casino flowing.As an extreme example, spreading your play around also
protects you from dishonesty. Sure, it is rare, but if it
happens at a casino you play heavily, the damage can be really
bad. If you spread your play around, the damage will be less
severe...........
QZ
What QZ lays out here is akin to diversifying your portfolio when choosing
investments, a way to reduce the risk from business cycles peculiar to
different industries AKA "Don't put all your eggs in one basket."
Good advice.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]