I can't answer the question for $10,000 bets (every casino has different policies for rating play at table games and for awarding comps), but as I've indicated, for the $10 bets, same situation, we got free (for a tip, not required but recommended) drinks, and nothing else (unless you include the scorn of the tuxedoed employees).
Most casinos (but not all) will see no greater value of a customer making a single $10,000 bet than one making 100 bets of $100 each. Although I suppose they might recognize that the cost of staff to process the single bet is less than the cost to process the multiple bets, and many would recognize that the volatility for the casino is much greater with the larger single bet.
All of this assumes they don't realize the two customers are acting in concert, but instead think they are independent bettors -- not likely if they both place their only bet at exactly the same time -- quite a coincidence. If they (correctly) suspect the collusion, they might decide that this is not a "play" worthy of any rating at all.
Incidentally, I would not recommend $10,000 bets just to get drunk - cost too great, and a progressive risk of making a big mistake and risking more than the collective off-setting bets wanted to risk 
I would suspect that a single (or cumulative over several smaller bets) $10,000 bet at a low-house-edge game like baccarat would not be as valuable as $10,000 wagered (single bet or over several bets) at a higher-house-edge game like craps or even moreso roulette.
Also, I don't know the pace of any of those games. I know when I played blackjack at a full table, playing a single spot, I could get about 30-60 hands an hour, while if I played at an empty table except for me and the dealer, and played two spots, I could get about 300 hands an hour (trust me, I've done the count), excluding shuffle time. I think craps and roulette are much much slower (takes longer to allow bets to be placed, longer to pay them, and also add some time for the wheel to spin in roulette), but baccarat goes pretty slowly too, for a game that could in fact be dealt pretty quickly if it weren't for the stuffy atmosphere that is desired.
As I think most people are aware, at most table games, a pit boss records time played and an estimate of average bet, and enters it into the player's records on the computer. At blackjack, where skill level matters, they might indicate an A, B, or C player to reflect how skillfully the player is playing. Based on what game is being played, time spent playing, average bet, and where applicable, skill level (but I don't think adjustments are made for the different "pace" in blackjack with a full or empty table), they will estimate the usual "hold" (how much the casino expects to win, the casino EV) for that player's "action", and then casino policy may dictate what percentage of the expected "hold" may be returned to customers as comps, and what "level" of offers will be presented to them, and of course, each casino will value its comps differently with regard to rooms, type of room, meals and types of restaurants, limos, and so forth, so that the amount of play getting "full room food and beverage / RFB" at an inexpensive casino might not even get a free room at an expensive one.
--BG
ยทยทยท
2c. Re: Closest 50/50 bet in a casino? There might be a good comp play h
Posted by: "danbvbv" dbaise@verizon.net danbvbv
Date: Sat Jun 6, 2009 12:48 am ((PDT))Suppose that two people walked up to a baccarat table and each placed a $10,000
bet, one for the banker and the other for the player. The collective loss would
be $100, but what would they gain in terms of rating, comps, treatment, and
offers from the casino?--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "Barry Glazer" wrote:
>
> > 1a. Re: Closest 50/50 bet in a casino? There might be a good comp play h
>
> One more on this - and I don't even know if it's a game that is available to
you for the action you're trying to generate.
>
> Baccarat has been mentioned as having a 0.5% edge. Just like taking both
sides of any other bet (that doesn't have a lose-no-matter-which-side option
like the zeroes on the roulette wheel), you and a partner can play baccarat,
with one of you betting the house and one betting the player. It is a no-skill
game, all plays are dictated by the rules.
>
> A friend and I used to do this a LONG time ago when we first went to Vegas;
we'd pool the money and share the win/loss, so all we ended up losing was the
house percentage, which used to be about 0.5% after the house takes its
commission on the side that has the slightly positive EV (I can't even remember
which side that is now). We were guaranteed a loss.
>
> At the time we did it, baccarat was a very slow game, and there was $10
minimum available, so we would lose about 5 cents a hand. Drinks were
complimentary (for a tip) and our purpose of this "play" was to get drunk on
comp'ed drinks at almost no cost -- and to do so at this very serious / stuffy
game with tuxedoed dealers and supervisors.
>
> Again, when we were just barely old enough to go to Vegas, this seemed like a
good idea
>