Obviously I missed that campaign. My problem with it is that it flies in the face of the standard mathematical definition of Expected Value, which is always unit based. For example, an EV=0.9 means that you can expect a return of 90 percent of whatever amount you bet. Thus, EV is independent of the size of the bet or the number of coins.
If vpFREE wants to use a different definition of EV, I can't change that, but it seems that it would confuse some readers.
Dan
···
"vpFae6128305" <vpfae6128305@Cox.net> wrote:
A couple of years ago vpFREE campaigned aggressively and,
in hindsight, amazingly successfully to stop the common
practice of using EV and ER interchangeably.In the context of game analysis, Dan's full post is dead on in stating
the standard definition of EV -- expected win (payout) from a hold,
expressed in bet units.See FAQ #8 for vpFREE's definitions of EV and ER:
<http://members.cox.net/vpfree/FAQ.htm#8>.
EV is stated in units or dollars
ER is a percentage measurement
--
Dan Paymar
Author of best selling book, "Video Poker - Optimum Play"
Editor/Publisher of VP newsletter "Video Poker Times"
Developer of VP analysis/trainer software "Optimum Video Poker"
Visit my web site at www.OptimumPlay.com
"Chance favors the prepared mind." -- Louis Pasteur