vpFREE2 Forums

Dan's At It Again; Just Tired of It All !

In a message dated 3/5/2006 5:23:59 PM Pacific Standard Time,
bob.dancer@compdance.com writes:
As bad as Dan's strategies were (and are), they are still protected by
copyright. If he wants to print his 8th Edition strategies here, I will
gleefully explain to everybody how bad they are.

I speak only for myself when I say that this bantering over the mathematical
strategies is offbase for this particular website. This debate for
"coronation" is so childish on a site that aims mainly on what game is available where
and possible cash or bounce back.

I am sure there are recognized mathematical journals that should each author
submit for publication, the mathematical community at large may then dissect
to the nth degree the accuracy of their research. The subject matter and the
approval of peer mathematicians without biases could better judge the
material. I think the majority of our membership does not have this background.

As in any field, there are journals and then there are journals. I have
published in and read more trade bulletins/phamplets on drug analysis in my time.
These were aimed mainly for working analysts across the nation to update the
appearance and analysis of exotic derivatives in the 60's and 70's. My
articles, however, would never be considered scientific enough by JACS (Journal of
the American Chemical Society) a purist journal of true chemistry.

I was pleased to hear that Sanford Wong on seeing the advanced materials on
the market candidly stated that these now surpass anything he did in his time.
How long will this website be burdened by this on going feud? Can you settle
this or take it outside as is the expression.?

I may have seen but have not met either Mr. Dancer or Mr. Paymar. I'm just
so tired of all this bickering.

Anteroz

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

anterozlv wrote:

I speak only for myself when I say that this bantering over the
mathematical strategies is offbase for this particular website ...
I may have seen but have not met either Mr. Dancer or Mr. Paymar. I'm
just so tired of all this bickering.

Fair call. I can't fault anyone for making what they view as a
factual statement (when stated in non-personal terms) -- or for that
matter, responding to what they feel is inaccurate.

But, in the context of this group, this particular discussion is only
marginally enlightening and introduces a rather unpleasant contentious
note. Given that this turf has recently been covered, there's good
cause for letting this go.

- H.

strategies is offbase for this particular website. This debate for
"coronation" is so childish on a site that aims mainly on what game is available where
and possible cash or bounce back<<

Oh, No, Anteroz, you speak for me also. That men of intelligence could sink to this plain is just not understandable. I forget which motion picture it was but the unforgetable line was "can't we all just get along?" - there is room for everyone's opinion, charts, tables, theories, etc. on this list and room for discussion. The word "coronation" is the key.....someone wants to be King.

Thanks for an insightful, concise stance on the issue.
Cheers!
Bonnie Strong
   
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

···

----- Original Message ----- From: anterozlv@aol.com To: vpFREE@yahoogroups.com >>

I speak only for myself when I say that this bantering over the mathematical

"Bonita Strong" <mothra4@...> wrote:

I forget which motion picture it was but the unforgetable line
was "can't we all just get along?"

That wasn't a movie, it was so-called Reality (hard to keep them
straight sometimes). Rodney King famously asked "Can't we all just get
along?" during the LA riots.

Stuart (RandomStu)