vpFREE2 Forums

Dan is attacking again - MOVED TO FREEvpFREE

#1

This administrative post on a thread that was moved to FREEvpFREE
should have been posted on FREEvpFREE or handled by private email.

I will respond to the message on FREEvpFREE.

vpFREE Administrator

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

···

To: vpFREE@yahoogroups.com
From: Curtis Rich <LGTVegas@gmail.com>
Date sent: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 18:50:11 -0600
Subject: Re: [vpFREE] RE: Dan is attacking again - MOVED TO FREEvpFREE

Dear vpFREE Administrator,

     Re: Your comment stating that "Whether or not
' But then Bob likes to "take a shot." ' is an attack, or not,
your response is completely out of line...."

     I don't think that the phrase "....take a shot...." is
necessarily a negative remark. Personally, I like to
"....take a shot...." myself sometimes!

     Why is this statement out of line, 'regardless of whether
it is an attack or not?' If it is not an attack, what makes it
inappropriate?

     It sounds to me like you are being preferential toward
Mr. Dancer.

     Re: Your comment "All public responses to negative
posts must be non-personal and factual."

     Having messages be factual is a given. However,
asking that all messages be 'non-personal' is not.
No group can have a meaningful discussion and remain
completely non-personal. I'm sure that, if I searched the
group's archives, I would find hundreds of posts from
vpFREE members that are personal in nature. That is
how it should be.

Sincerely,
Curtis

PS I do not subscribe to FREEvpFREE. So, I will never know how
the "Dan is attacking again - MOVED TO FREEvpFREE" story ends.

#2

Now are Dan the Man and Bob Dancer STILL not getting along? What is
the world of guru-video-poker coming to? Sure looks like it's time
for The Queen to sneak in and take reign of the throne, that is, if
she can find the additional make-believe pieces of BS that it's
comprised of! Maybe if she checks with her host......

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, vpFREE Administrator
<vp_free@y...> wrote:

This administrative post on a thread that was moved to FREEvpFREE
should have been posted on FREEvpFREE or handled by private email.

I will respond to the message on FREEvpFREE.

vpFREE Administrator

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

To: vpFREE@yahoogroups.com
From: Curtis Rich <LGTVegas@g...>
Date sent: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 18:50:11 -0600
Subject: Re: [vpFREE] RE: Dan is attacking again -

MOVED TO FREEvpFREE

···

Dear vpFREE Administrator,

     Re: Your comment stating that "Whether or not
' But then Bob likes to "take a shot." ' is an attack, or not,
your response is completely out of line...."

     I don't think that the phrase "....take a shot...." is
necessarily a negative remark. Personally, I like to
"....take a shot...." myself sometimes!

     Why is this statement out of line, 'regardless of whether
it is an attack or not?' If it is not an attack, what makes it
inappropriate?

     It sounds to me like you are being preferential toward
Mr. Dancer.

     Re: Your comment "All public responses to negative
posts must be non-personal and factual."

     Having messages be factual is a given. However,
asking that all messages be 'non-personal' is not.
No group can have a meaningful discussion and remain
completely non-personal. I'm sure that, if I searched the
group's archives, I would find hundreds of posts from
vpFREE members that are personal in nature. That is
how it should be.

Sincerely,
Curtis

PS I do not subscribe to FREEvpFREE. So, I will never know how
the "Dan is attacking again - MOVED TO FREEvpFREE" story ends.