> ... You practice censorship,in an anonymous
> and cowardly fashion, on a regular basis.
"Cowardly" is an apt word.
I can live with that, considering the sources.
The administrator secretly bars people without notifying the
forum that the censorship has taken place, and refuses
requests to make public his (apparently secret) email with
the barring order.
If the vpFREE Forums practiced censorship, I wouldn't
be reading your post now.
The vpFREE Forums do not practice censorship and only
one person has ever been permanently barred from posting
on all of the Forums.
I decide if an administrative action should be handled publicly
or privately. The violator can always make it public on
FREEvpFREE if they like.
The administrator secretly puts many other on moderated
status, so he can censor their posts.
Only one member's posts have ever been censored on
vpFREE and that was with the member's permission.
There aren't many members on moderated status and
they're there to ensure that a post that belongs on
FREEvpFREE doesn't go through on the wrong forum.
The administrator becomes extremely upset when his email
announcing the barring is made public, even on this forum
which is located in Siberia.
Your email didn't upset me. I just pointed out that you
had little regard for internet etiquette and normal practices.
"Cowardly" is accurate.
Considering the inaccuracies in your posts, I don't place
much credence in your use of the word.
vpFREE Administrator
ยทยทยท
On 24 Nov 2005 at 21:44, jw776655 wrote: