vpFREE2 Forums

Connecticut Indian Casinos

#1

In case anyone cares, I did hit a royal on a $1 9/6 Bow and Arrow in
December so, if the chips are rigged, they occasionally do let a royal get
by. Having played at Mohegan the past year I don't see any difference with
the payoff there than with Vegas however this is just a observation and
hardly backed by any scientific evidence.

My biggest problem with the indian casinos in CT are not the indians but
the state of CT and the frustrating way they treat gambling winnings...that
is the crime.

[Original Message]
From: <iwashcar@aol.com>
To: <vpFREE@yahoogroups.com>
Date: 1/24/03 10:41:37 PM
Subject: Re: [vpFREE] Re: Connecticut Indian Casinos

In a message dated 1/24/03 9:54:36 PM Eastern Standard Time,

haaljo@yahoo.com

writes:

> Why not
> just "Jimmy" the chip instead of changing the paytable?
>

I do not know the answer to that. I would guess that they are trying to

go

legit and not have these rumors constantly circulating.When I asked the
gaming commission what% they paid out they said 92%. The pay schedules of

7/5

would reflect that %. Nobody played more hands than I did at The Wolf Den
bar. I really enjoyed it there. I never had a Royal but I did have eight
straight flushes to the King. Never saw anyone else get a royal

either.Anyone

who plays the 7/5 or 6/5 they both offer would be really desperate for

action.

···

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

vpFREE Home Page:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vpFREE

vpFREE Links:
http://www.lvcm.com/tomesims/VP/Links.html

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

#2

Have you seen the payback charts in Casino Player for CT & LV? Would
put an end to any doubt about how bad it is here.

In case anyone cares, I did hit a royal on a $1 9/6 Bow and Arrow in
December so, if the chips are rigged, they occasionally do let a

royal get

by. Having played at Mohegan the past year I don't see any

difference with

the payoff there than with Vegas however this is just a observation

and

hardly backed by any scientific evidence.

My biggest problem with the indian casinos in CT are not the

indians but

the state of CT and the frustrating way they treat gambling

winnings...that

is the crime.

> [Original Message]
> From: <iwashcar@a...>
> To: <vpFREE@yahoogroups.com>
> Date: 1/24/03 10:41:37 PM
> Subject: Re: [vpFREE] Re: Connecticut Indian Casinos
>
> In a message dated 1/24/03 9:54:36 PM Eastern Standard Time,
haaljo@y...
> writes:
>
>
> > Why not
> > just "Jimmy" the chip instead of changing the paytable?
> >
>
> I do not know the answer to that. I would guess that they are

trying to

go
> legit and not have these rumors constantly circulating.When I

asked the

> gaming commission what% they paid out they said 92%. The pay

schedules of

7/5
> would reflect that %. Nobody played more hands than I did at The

Wolf Den

> bar. I really enjoyed it there. I never had a Royal but I did

have eight

> straight flushes to the King. Never saw anyone else get a royal
either.Anyone
> who plays the 7/5 or 6/5 they both offer would be really

desperate for

action.
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
> vpFREE Home Page:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vpFREE
>
> vpFREE Links:
> http://www.lvcm.com/tomesims/VP/Links.html
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to

http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

···

--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "Jack CT" <meowmeow33@e...> wrote:

>