--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, Bob Sommer - Top of the World Coins
<NL7HT@b...> wrote:
The problem is that the field tests have been in extremely small
areas
of the cities they are testing. These test cities are just now
starting
to go area wide. Time will tell. I actually hope the tests are
successful, but even the FCC has admitted that there is potential
for
major problems if it is not done properly and monitored closely.
Bob
I'm not recommending that BPL be implemented in LV, I'm asking that
it be investigated, as you suggested too. Las Vegas may be ideally
suited for BPL because in many areas the power lines are buried, and
I think that's true of most of the strip too. But in the older
areas, with overhead power lines, BPL may not be a good choice.
In other words, BPL could be used inside strip hotels, and in areas
with buried lines. I think its possible to be selective as to BPL
service areas because the transformers that serve a particular area
(or hotel) will stop the BPL signal from straying elsewhere (to the
overhead lines). Hotel guests are the main target market, because
they aren't served well today at most hotels.
As far as individual hotels are concerned, the good thing is that
every room is alredy wired. It would be very inexpensive to get
up and running, compared to stringing cable. And hotel guests don't
need their own modem. The hotel could install a BPL modem in each
room, or give one to guests that request them (for a fee?).
This is a very new technology, so I'm sure some of the problems will
be solved. There is at least one company, already, that claims it
has completely solved the interference problem.