vpFREE2 Forums

Coast Connection Today

IMO, the real "stupid fucktards" are the APs who never got AC's message.

30K coin-in counts as "pounding"?

From the casino's perspective, the 10X coupons are being used to
promote business and reward their "good customers"

If that were the goal then wouldn't a smarter method be to send a
targeted mailing to those "good customers" and make the multiplier
available only to them, instead of inserting them into a newspaper with
6-digit circulation?

and that is the CASINO'S right.

Absolutely, but if rewarding their good customers was really the goal,
they picked a stupid way to go about it. But I agree with you that
they're entirely within their rights and that it shouldn't exactly come
as a surprise to APs.

···

On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 3:46 PM, chungsterama <chungsty@yahoo.com> wrote:

I agree with you 100% K F!

If I was among the trespassed players, I would try to find out who else had been treated
in this egregious manner, band together with as many of them as I could, and contact
the NGC, as a "Class Action" entity.

Telling the players that they were not eligible for an advertised promotion is one thing: 86ing them in this high handed manner is quite another!

~Babe

···

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--- On Sat, 3/5/11, King Fish <vpkingfish@gmail.com> wrote:

Suncoast does 10X points, is surprised by the action and starts
barring people after less than two hours.

Now, if I were in charge of a casino I would certainly want to keep
APs from thinking it was worth it to play there. I might even 'bar'
some, but I would do it politely. Like the Silverton, who sent me a
nice polite letter saying I was no longer eligible for mailer,
multipliers, promos, drawings etc.

But that's not what we're talking about. If I'm in charge of a casino
and one of my managers creates a situation where their solution is to
cut a promo short or bar (or trespass!) people for nor more than
showing up to whey when they were invited to do so, then I would fire
that imbecile because he doesn't understand gambling and he's too
stupid to continue to work for me.

Controlling APs' ability to make money from you is understandable.

Reacting to these situations by barring and trespassing people is
ham-handed and reactionary.

But it's the part where they're surprised by what happens that makes
them idiots. Gambling is their core business, and they show by their
actions (both the ones related here and others that were not) that
they don't know as much about it as they should. That, and the way
they handle their mistakes, is why I consider them stupid fucktards.

If I ran the casino, it would be in the casino's best interest not to
have these reactionary mouth breathers working there.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

You are right. If we treat it as a war, we are going to lose this war.

But on the other hand, please consider the following: This is not the first time you see this happening at the Sun Coast. I know a fellow who was treated almost as bad (he was not escorted out of the casino by security guards) because he had the audacity to win 2 double Royal on a 25 cent machine on a day when the Sun Coast had a promotion that when you hit a second Royal Flush within 24 hours you get paid double.

Since that happened I followed the development at this casino closely, talking to other people and also to employees of the Sun Coast and I came to the conclusion that this whole mess there is the result of a General Manager letting middle management run amok.

It is true, the Sun Coast has the right to expel anybody it wants to expel. They do not have to explain why they do that. But do they have the right to humiliate people in front of their friends despite the fact that those people did absolutely nothing wrong? Let's see what they did: They were invited to the Sun Coast to play on a day when the Sun Coast had a promotion going giving 10 x points for Video Poker players. They went and played and by doing so they lost 2000 Dollars. They had done nothing wrong whatever but were nevertheless humiliated in a way not even a mafia gangster would do. Escorting long time customers under guard to the outside. Where are we, people, in Stalin era Russia?

The Sun Coast was and is very lucky they were not sued by those people and as far as the NGCB is concerned, I am sure they would not have allowed this behavior if they would have known about it.

···

=====================================================================

  ----- Original Message -----
  From: bobbartop
  To: vpFREE@yahoogroups.com
  Sent: Friday, March 04, 2011 11:37 AM
  Subject: [vpFREE] Re: Coast Connection Today

  --- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "nudge51" <nudge51@...> wrote:
  >

  > There is certainly nothing wrong with making a stand when they try to pull
  > this crazy crap, if you do it the smart way. The NGCB was put into place to
  > not only protect the casinos from some of their patrons, but also to protect
  > the patrons from some of the casinos. If anyone feels that they may
  > encounter a situation that you believe could be in violation of one of the
  > gaming statutes, put the phone number of the Nevada Gaming Control
  > Board--Enforcement Division into your cell phone. Their local number is
  > 486-2020, and their offices are on E Washington, just east of LV Blvd.. If
  > suits approach you and start the trespass act spiel, whip out the cell phone
  > and tell the suit who is spewing this speech that you are calling to
  > request an NGCB agent to meet you at the casino, possibly at the players
  > club. If the suit prefers another location within the casino, give the
  > agent on the phone the proper information, and they should be there within a
  > half hour or 45 minutes. When you call to settle any dispute, the NGCB is
  > required by law to dispatch an agent to your location.
  > Nudge
  >

  I think what is far more important than trying to battle with the suits and the casinos on something like this, is trying to understand what they are thinking. What is motivating them? How do they justify this in their mind? What are they trying to accomplish. This whole story about Suncoast seems bizarre to me. What part of the picture am I missing? I think it's far more important to learn what really happened, so we can all try to avoid this in the future. Advantage players need to go along to get along. If we treat it as a war, we're going to lose.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

I am fully behind this and I am certain that we are talking about the same mouth breather. Unfortunately his boss lets him do that. I drew the attention of the main office to him, but he is obviously still running strong. You remember Susan Ryder? A devoted and very nice slot hostess. Does anybody know why she left or possibly why she HAD to leave?

···

=========================================
  ----- Original Message -----
  From: patricia swenson
  To: vpFREE@yahoogroups.com
  Sent: Sunday, March 06, 2011 7:20 AM
  Subject: Re: [vpFREE] Re: Coast Connection Today

  I agree with you 100% K F!
   
  If I was among the trespassed players, I would try to find out who else had been treated
  in this egregious manner, band together with as many of them as I could, and contact
  the NGC, as a "Class Action" entity.
   
  Telling the players that they were not eligible for an advertised promotion is one thing: 86ing them in this high handed manner is quite another!
   
  ~Babe
   
  ----------------------------------------------------------
  --- On Sat, 3/5/11, King Fish <vpkingfish@gmail.com> wrote:
   
  Suncoast does 10X points, is surprised by the action and starts
  barring people after less than two hours.

  Now, if I were in charge of a casino I would certainly want to keep
  APs from thinking it was worth it to play there. I might even 'bar'
  some, but I would do it politely. Like the Silverton, who sent me a
  nice polite letter saying I was no longer eligible for mailer,
  multipliers, promos, drawings etc.

  But that's not what we're talking about. If I'm in charge of a casino
  and one of my managers creates a situation where their solution is to
  cut a promo short or bar (or trespass!) people for nor more than
  showing up to whey when they were invited to do so, then I would fire
  that imbecile because he doesn't understand gambling and he's too
  stupid to continue to work for me.

  Controlling APs' ability to make money from you is understandable.

  Reacting to these situations by barring and trespassing people is
  ham-handed and reactionary.

  But it's the part where they're surprised by what happens that makes
  them idiots. Gambling is their core business, and they show by their
  actions (both the ones related here and others that were not) that
  they don't know as much about it as they should. That, and the way
  they handle their mistakes, is why I consider them stupid fucktards.

  If I ran the casino, it would be in the casino's best interest not to
  have these reactionary mouth breathers working there.

  [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

In November 2009, I was playing at the Suncoast to maintain my mailer. I was approached by a supervisor and security and was told that I was not allowed to play video poker there, any more. I left the casino without cashing the cash out ticket. It didn't occur to me until I was outside that I might as well cash the ticket, since I wouldn't be playing there again. So I walked back in and, in full view of a security guard whose obvious task it was to watch me, cashed out the ticket. He was so close to me that I even sarcastically asked him if it was okay if I "played" the cash out machine. In January 2010, I was there and asked for a room comp. That I was still getting invitations from them was one reason I felt free to do this in spite of what I had been told in November and I had been there several times in the meantime, so I was totally surprised by what then happened. Security surrounded me. I was asked if I had been 86ed. I said I hadn't been. This conversation was repeated a few times. I finally volunteered the information that in November, I had been told not to play video poker machines. He responded "so you HAVE been 86ed!" Explaining the difference was to no avail. They turned me around, put me in handcuffs, and said I was under arrest for trespassing. After being dragged through the casino, I spent 3.5 hours handcuffed in their security office and 12 hours in jail. I am suing them.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

···

----- Helmut <hewolf@cox.net> wrote:

The Sun Coast was and is very lucky they were not sued by those people and as far as the NGCB is concerned, I am sure they would not have allowed this behavior if they would have known about it.

<snip>

May I ask you what your "crime" was?

···

--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, Tom Robertson <007@...> wrote:

In November 2009, I was playing at the Suncoast to maintain my mailer. I was approached by a supervisor and security and was told that I was not allowed to play video poker there, any more.

Why do any one you keep playing at the Suncoast?

There is NOTHING there that can be found better at other casinos.

This is the only way to deal with them.

I was 86'd because I won a two BJ hands after raising my bet
from $5 to $25.

Haven't been back since and don't miss them.

···

________________________________
From: bobbartop <bobbartop@yahoo.com>
To: vpFREE@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sun, March 6, 2011 10:10:24 PM
Subject: [vpFREE] Re: Coast Connection Today

--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, Tom Robertson <007@...> wrote:

In November 2009, I was playing at the Suncoast to maintain my mailer. I was
approached by a supervisor and security and was told that I was not allowed to
play video poker there, any more.

<snip>

May I ask you what your "crime" was?

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

···

----- bobbartop <bobbartop@yahoo.com> wrote:

--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, Tom Robertson <007@...> wrote:

>

> In November 2009, I was playing at the Suncoast to maintain my mailer. I was approached by a supervisor and security and was told that I was not allowed to play video poker there, any more.

<snip>

May I ask you what your "crime" was?I wasn't told. It happened very quickly, so I suspect they had set up some kind of alert in their computer for when I started playing.

Security surrounded me. I was asked if I had been 86ed. I said I hadn't been.
This conversation was repeated a few times. I finally volunteered the information
that in November, I had been told not to play video poker machines. He responded
"so you HAVE been 86ed!" Explaining the difference was to no avail. They turned
me around, put me in handcuffs, and said I was under arrest for trespassing.

they seem confused on the concept.

a while ago i talked to a guy who showed up and played for a while on
10/10/10, and was tapped on the shoulder and told to stop playing for
the rest of the day. no explanation, but he complied and left. he'd
played regularly on non-multiplier days, sometimes played other games
besides VP (including occasional penny slots with his wife), and
expected to continue doing so.

he called a couple of days later to ask about a dinner comp, and the
players club told him that he'd been 86'd, and would be trespassing
and subject to arrest if he showed up anywhere on the property. news
to him! good thing he happened to call instead of showing up!

Explaining the difference was to no avail. They turned me around, put me in handcuffs,
and said I was under arrest for trespassing. After being dragged through the casino,
I spent 3.5 hours handcuffed in their security office and 12 hours in jail. I am suing them.

wow. sorry you had to go through that, but i'm very glad to hear
you're suing. good luck with your case, and keep us posted.

best wishes,

five

···

Tom Robertson <007@embarqmail.com> wrote:

They turned me around, put me in handcuffs, and said I was under arrest for trespassing. After being dragged through the casino, I spent 3.5 hours handcuffed in their security office and 12 hours in jail. I am suing them.

I think we need to consider this incident in the larger context of business and consumer behavior. If anything even remotely similar to this episode occurred at a Walmart, we would hear immediate calls for apologies and boycotts until the issues were addressed and corrected. Nevada law obviously favors the casinos, but that does not prevent consumers from taking action to protect our interests. I, for one, will never step foot in the Suncoast again. Perhaps if others are willing to take a similar stand Boyd will reconsider mistreating its customers.

···

--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, Tom Robertson <007@...> wrote:

Tom Robertson <007@...> wrote:

In November 2009, I was playing at the Suncoast to maintain my mailer. I was approached by a supervisor and security and was told that I was not allowed to play video poker there, any more.

. . .

···

In January 2010, I was there and asked for a room comp. That I was still getting invitations from them was one reason I felt free to do this in spite of what I had been told in November and I had been there several times in the meantime, so I was totally surprised by what then happened. Security surrounded me. I was asked if I had been 86ed. I said I hadn't been. This conversation was repeated a few times. I finally volunteered the information that in November, I had been told not to play video poker machines. He responded "so you HAVE been 86ed!"

------------------
I have heard from one or two other players that if you receive an invitation from a property that has previously "86'd" you, that you are now free to visit the property in question. I have often wondered if an invitation from a property in such a situation has the effect of negating the 86'ing.

Tom, has your lawyer had made any comment on this point that you could share with us?

Thanks and

G'luck all,
Gamb00ler

i was going to point out that it's legally questionable whether the
86'ing of a skilled player who is neither disruptive nor disorderly
can be enforced at all. recently the north las vegas municipal court
ruled that it couldn't.

http://bj21.com/al/Order%20to%20Dismiss.PDF

then i saw the name of the defendant in that case and realized that
tom probably knows about it already :wink:

go tom! we appreciate your efforts.

···

gamb00ler <gamb00ler@yahoo.com> wrote:

I have heard from one or two other players that if you receive an invitation from a property that has previously "86'd" you, that you are now free to visit the property in question. I have often wondered if an invitation from a property in such a situation has the effect of negating the 86'ing.

Tom, has your lawyer had made any comment on this point that you could share with us?

Oh, he loves those. I'm suing both Jerry's Nugget and the Suncoast
and I received several invitations from both of them after they 86ed
me. He believes they do negate the 86.

···

Tom Robertson <007@...> wrote:

In November 2009, I was playing at the Suncoast to maintain my mailer. I was approached by a supervisor and security and was told that I was not allowed to play video poker there, any more.

. . .

In January 2010, I was there and asked for a room comp. That I was still getting invitations from them was one reason I felt free to do this in spite of what I had been told in November and I had been there several times in the meantime, so I was totally surprised by what then happened. Security surrounded me. I was asked if I had been 86ed. I said I hadn't been. This conversation was repeated a few times. I finally volunteered the information that in November, I had been told not to play video poker machines. He responded "so you HAVE been 86ed!"

------------------
I have heard from one or two other players that if you receive an invitation from a property that has previously "86'd" you, that you are now free to visit the property in question. I have often wondered if an invitation from a property in such a situation has the effect of negating the 86'ing.

Tom, has your lawyer had made any comment on this point that you could share with us?

Thanks and

G'luck all,
Gamb00ler

I don't know what to make of that ruling. It makes me wonder what the
casino may do. If they may not 86 a player just for playing, may they
even stop anyone from playing?

···

gamb00ler <gamb00ler@yahoo.com> wrote:

I have heard from one or two other players that if you receive an invitation from a property that has previously "86'd" you, that you are now free to visit the property in question. I have often wondered if an invitation from a property in such a situation has the effect of negating the 86'ing.

Tom, has your lawyer had made any comment on this point that you could share with us?

i was going to point out that it's legally questionable whether the
86'ing of a skilled player who is neither disruptive nor disorderly
can be enforced at all. recently the north las vegas municipal court
ruled that it couldn't.

http://bj21.com/al/Order%20to%20Dismiss.PDF

then i saw the name of the defendant in that case and realized that
tom probably knows about it already :wink:

go tom! we appreciate your efforts.

Cogno, you are wrong. That clause "management reserves all rights" has teeth if you read the actual words of said contract.

Here's an example of that MRAR clause for an unnamed casino: "Any rule or procedure relating to the [slot club] may be changed, modified or cancelled by [unnamed casino] at any time at its sole discretion. All decisions by management are final and binding."

That clause is also found in credit cards.

···

--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, Cogno Scienti <cognoscienti@...> wrote:

Contract law is a bit more complicated than that. "Management reserves all
rights" doesn't mean anything.

30K coin-in counts as "pounding"?

Neither my nor your definition of "pounding" is relevant. What is relevant is the casino's definition of pounding. That is another point lost to many AP's.

Personally, I don't recall Anthony Curtis defining "pounding" in any objective way in his article.

If that were the goal then wouldn't a smarter method be to send a
targeted mailing to those "good customers" and make the multiplier
available only to them, instead of inserting them into a newspaper
with 6-digit circulation?

You have to keep in mind "good customers" may also include new customers.

···

--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "Peter M." <midnight1626@...> wrote:

From reading through these Suncoast posts it appears to me there is a clear pattern of abuse of patrons by Suncoast management. There are just too many stories by vpFREE'ers here. It has to be just the tip of the iceberg as most vp players are not members here.

In the case of receiving an invitational mailer after being 86'd, this is a very tricky situation. It's usually the case of one hand not knowing what the other hand is doing. In most casinos Security operates autonomously.....and doesn't inform the slot club when 86'ing a player. I've known players to try the ploy of handing Security their slot card and telling them to go check how much money they've dumped in that casino. The usual response is "We are not allowed to see those records." Conversely, the Slot Club can't trump a Security decision.

I know one vp pro who had been 86'd from Harrah's Tahoe. He kept receiving mailers. Finally, one came in that was highly lucrative. He made a copy of it and carried it on his person to the casino. He kept the original at home as a contingency plan if he got arrested. He went in on the play and after awhile was approached by Security.

"Sir, haven't you been 86'd from this property?" the Suit asked.
"I thought that was all cleared up" the hustler responded.

He pulled out the copy of the invitation and handed it to the Suit. The Suit read the offer with a disgusted look on his face.

"We want you off the property right now" said the Suit. "And if you come back again you will go to jail."

Tom has the right lawyer. Bob Nersesian has the talent, experience, and dedication to get the job done. Casino execs hate to hear his name.

http://www.reviewjournal.com/lvrj_home/2006/Jul-31-Mon-2006/business/8486963.html

···

--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, fivespot <fivespot55@...> wrote:

i was going to point out that it's legally questionable whether the
86'ing of a skilled player who is neither disruptive nor disorderly
can be enforced at all. recently the north las vegas municipal court
ruled that it couldn't.

http://bj21.com/al/Order%20to%20Dismiss.PDF

then i saw the name of the defendant in that case and realized that
tom probably knows about it already :wink:

go tom! we appreciate your efforts.

And you think that if someone writes something down that makes it true?

Cogno

···

-----Original Message-----
From: vpFREE@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vpF…@…com] On Behalf Of
chungsterama
Sent: Tuesday, March 8, 2011 12:38 AM
To: vpFREE@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [vpFREE] Re: Coast Connection Today

--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, Cogno Scienti <cognoscienti@...> wrote:

Contract law is a bit more complicated than that. "Management reserves
all rights" doesn't mean anything.

Cogno, you are wrong. That clause "management reserves all rights" has
teeth if you read the actual words of said contract.

Here's an example of that MRAR clause for an unnamed casino: "Any rule or
procedure relating to the [slot club] may be changed, modified or cancelled
by [unnamed casino] at any time at its sole discretion. All decisions by
management are final and binding."

That clause is also found in credit cards.

------------------------------------

vpFREE Links: http://members.cox.net/vpfree/Links.htm

Yahoo! Groups Links

I was wondering if maybe Suncoast knew ahead of time who you are, and were waiting for you. Do you think it's possible some of the casinos have shared information and branded you as a "trouble maker"?

This sure sounds nearsighted and downright foolish on the parts of the casinos. When they worry about the small percentage of AP video poker players, it's like they're walking over dollars to pick up pennies.

···

--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, Tom Robertson <007@...> wrote:

Oh, he loves those. I'm suing both Jerry's Nugget and the Suncoast
and I received several invitations from both of them after they 86ed
me. He believes they do negate the 86.