vpFREE2 Forums

CIA memo paints bleak picture of Iraq's future

Yo Robbie, if these are the guys you trust you may want to look for
some new friends. hahaha!

CIA memo paints bleak picture of Iraq's future
By DOUGLAS JEHL
New York Times

WASHINGTON -- A classified cable sent by the CIA's station chief in
Baghdad has warned that the situation in Iraq is deteriorating and
may not rebound any time soon, according to government officials.

The cable, sent late last month as the officer ended a yearlong
tour, presented a bleak assessment on matters of politics, economics
and security, the officials said. They said its basic conclusions
had been echoed in briefings presented by a senior CIA official who
recently visited Iraq.

The officials described the two assessments as having been "mixed,"
saying that they did describe Iraq as having made important
progress, particularly in terms of its political process, and
credited Iraqis with being resilient.

But overall, the officials described the station chief's cable in
particular as an unvarnished assessment of the difficulties ahead in
Iraq. They said it warned that the security situation was likely to
get worse, bringing more violence and sectarian clashes, unless
there were marked improvements soon in the ability of the Iraqi
government to assert authority and build the economy.

Together, the appraisals, which follow several other such warnings
from officials in Washington and in the field, were much more
pessimistic than the public picture being offered by the Bush
administration before the elections scheduled for Iraq next month,
the officials said. The cable was sent to CIA headquarters after
U.S. forces completed what military commanders have described as a
significant victory, with the retaking of Fallujah, a principal base
of the Iraqi insurgency, in mid-November.

The U.S. ambassador to Iraq, John D. Negroponte, was said by the
officials to have filed a written dissent, objecting to one finding
as too harsh. But the top U.S. military commander in Iraq, Gen.
George W. Casey Jr., also reviewed the cable and did not dispute its
conclusions, the officials said.

The station chief cannot be publicly identified, because he
continues to work undercover.

Asked about the cable, a White House spokesman, Sean McCormack, said
he could not discuss intelligence matters. A CIA spokesman would say
only that he could not comment on any classified document.

The senior CIA official who visited Iraq and then briefed
counterparts from other government agencies was Michael Kostiw, a
senior adviser to the CIA director, Porter Goss. One government
official who knew about Kostiw's briefings described them as "an
honest portrayal of the situation on the ground."

Check the source....the NYTimes. And if it were a classified cable
the NYTimes would not have it, and the reporter would disappear in a
flash. Use your head instead of constantly surfing for nonsense that
fits your loser scenario.

Yo Robbie, if these are the guys you trust you may want to look for
some new friends. hahaha!

CIA memo paints bleak picture of Iraq's future
By DOUGLAS JEHL
New York Times

WASHINGTON -- A classified cable sent by the CIA's station chief in
Baghdad has warned that the situation in Iraq is deteriorating and
may not rebound any time soon, according to government officials.

The cable, sent late last month as the officer ended a yearlong
tour, presented a bleak assessment on matters of politics,

economics

and security, the officials said. They said its basic conclusions
had been echoed in briefings presented by a senior CIA official who
recently visited Iraq.

The officials described the two assessments as having been "mixed,"
saying that they did describe Iraq as having made important
progress, particularly in terms of its political process, and
credited Iraqis with being resilient.

But overall, the officials described the station chief's cable in
particular as an unvarnished assessment of the difficulties ahead

in

Iraq. They said it warned that the security situation was likely to
get worse, bringing more violence and sectarian clashes, unless
there were marked improvements soon in the ability of the Iraqi
government to assert authority and build the economy.

Together, the appraisals, which follow several other such warnings
from officials in Washington and in the field, were much more
pessimistic than the public picture being offered by the Bush
administration before the elections scheduled for Iraq next month,
the officials said. The cable was sent to CIA headquarters after
U.S. forces completed what military commanders have described as a
significant victory, with the retaking of Fallujah, a principal

base

of the Iraqi insurgency, in mid-November.

The U.S. ambassador to Iraq, John D. Negroponte, was said by the
officials to have filed a written dissent, objecting to one finding
as too harsh. But the top U.S. military commander in Iraq, Gen.
George W. Casey Jr., also reviewed the cable and did not dispute

its

conclusions, the officials said.

The station chief cannot be publicly identified, because he
continues to work undercover.

Asked about the cable, a White House spokesman, Sean McCormack,

said

he could not discuss intelligence matters. A CIA spokesman would

say

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "John" <three2theroyal@y...> wrote:

only that he could not comment on any classified document.

The senior CIA official who visited Iraq and then briefed
counterparts from other government agencies was Michael Kostiw, a
senior adviser to the CIA director, Porter Goss. One government
official who knew about Kostiw's briefings described them as "an
honest portrayal of the situation on the ground."

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "John" <three2theroyal@y...>

wrote:

>
Check the source....the NYTimes. And if it were a classified cable
the NYTimes would not have it, and the reporter would disappear in

a

flash. Use your head instead of constantly surfing for nonsense

that

fits your loser scenario.

So, the NYT isn't a reliable source for news!! Theri reporters woul
disappear in a flash. Are'nt these the same guys who reported the
Pentagon Papers?? Who disappeared then. ASS-CLOWN. LIAR.
PROPAGANDIST. What do you consider a reliable news source?? You have
said that every mainstream rag I have mentioned isn't. Maybe you and
the morine only trust the Richmond Post-Dispatch.

> Yo Robbie, if these are the guys you trust you may want to look

for

> some new friends. hahaha!
>
> CIA memo paints bleak picture of Iraq's future
> By DOUGLAS JEHL
> New York Times
>
> WASHINGTON -- A classified cable sent by the CIA's station chief

in

> Baghdad has warned that the situation in Iraq is deteriorating

and

> may not rebound any time soon, according to government

officials.

>
> The cable, sent late last month as the officer ended a yearlong
> tour, presented a bleak assessment on matters of politics,
economics
> and security, the officials said. They said its basic

conclusions

> had been echoed in briefings presented by a senior CIA official

who

> recently visited Iraq.
>
> The officials described the two assessments as having

been "mixed,"

> saying that they did describe Iraq as having made important
> progress, particularly in terms of its political process, and
> credited Iraqis with being resilient.
>
> But overall, the officials described the station chief's cable

in

> particular as an unvarnished assessment of the difficulties

ahead

in
> Iraq. They said it warned that the security situation was likely

to

> get worse, bringing more violence and sectarian clashes, unless
> there were marked improvements soon in the ability of the Iraqi
> government to assert authority and build the economy.
>
> Together, the appraisals, which follow several other such

warnings

> from officials in Washington and in the field, were much more
> pessimistic than the public picture being offered by the Bush
> administration before the elections scheduled for Iraq next

month,

> the officials said. The cable was sent to CIA headquarters after
> U.S. forces completed what military commanders have described as

a

> significant victory, with the retaking of Fallujah, a principal
base
> of the Iraqi insurgency, in mid-November.
>
> The U.S. ambassador to Iraq, John D. Negroponte, was said by the
> officials to have filed a written dissent, objecting to one

finding

> as too harsh. But the top U.S. military commander in Iraq, Gen.
> George W. Casey Jr., also reviewed the cable and did not dispute
its
> conclusions, the officials said.
>
> The station chief cannot be publicly identified, because he
> continues to work undercover.
>
> Asked about the cable, a White House spokesman, Sean McCormack,
said
> he could not discuss intelligence matters. A CIA spokesman would
say
> only that he could not comment on any classified document.
>
> The senior CIA official who visited Iraq and then briefed
> counterparts from other government agencies was Michael Kostiw,

a

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "deadin7" <deadin7@y...> wrote:

> senior adviser to the CIA director, Porter Goss. One government
> official who knew about Kostiw's briefings described them as "an
> honest portrayal of the situation on the ground."

> Check the source....the NYTimes. And if it were a classified

cable the NYTimes would not have it, and the reporter would disappear
in a flash. Use your head instead of constantly surfing for nonsense

that fits your loser scenario.

So, the NYT isn't a reliable source for news!! Theri reporters woul
disappear in a flash. Are'nt these the same guys who reported the
Pentagon Papers?? Who disappeared then. ASS-CLOWN. LIAR.
PROPAGANDIST. What do you consider a reliable news source?? You

have said that every mainstream rag I have mentioned isn't. Maybe you
and the morine only trust the Richmond Post-Dispatch.

Like I said, read what you wrote and then use your head--whatever's
left of it anyway.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "John" <three2theroyal@y...> wrote:

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "John" <three2theroyal@y...>

wrote:

>
> > Check the source....the NYTimes. And if it were a classified
cable the NYTimes would not have it, and the reporter would

disappear

in a flash. Use your head instead of constantly surfing for

nonsense

> that fits your loser scenario.
>
> So, the NYT isn't a reliable source for news!! Theri reporters

woul

> disappear in a flash. Are'nt these the same guys who reported

the

> Pentagon Papers?? Who disappeared then. ASS-CLOWN. LIAR.
> PROPAGANDIST. What do you consider a reliable news source?? You
have said that every mainstream rag I have mentioned isn't. Maybe

you

and the morine only trust the Richmond Post-Dispatch.

Like I said, read what you wrote and then use your head--

whatever's

left of it anyway.

You're nuts. Just tell me what you mean. If you even know yourself.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "deadin7" <deadin7@y...> wrote:

Read my first response. If you don't get it then blame it on the
napalm.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "John" <three2theroyal@y...> wrote:

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "deadin7" <deadin7@y...> wrote:
>
> --- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "John" <three2theroyal@y...>
wrote:
> >
> > > Check the source....the NYTimes. And if it were a classified
> cable the NYTimes would not have it, and the reporter would
disappear
> in a flash. Use your head instead of constantly surfing for
nonsense
> > that fits your loser scenario.
> >
> > So, the NYT isn't a reliable source for news!! Theri reporters
woul
> > disappear in a flash. Are'nt these the same guys who reported
the
> > Pentagon Papers?? Who disappeared then. ASS-CLOWN. LIAR.
> > PROPAGANDIST. What do you consider a reliable news source?? You
> have said that every mainstream rag I have mentioned isn't. Maybe
you
> and the morine only trust the Richmond Post-Dispatch.
>
> Like I said, read what you wrote and then use your head--
whatever's left of it anyway.

You're nuts. Just tell me what you mean. If you even know yourself.

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "John" <three2theroyal@y...>

wrote:

>
> --- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "deadin7" <deadin7@y...>

wrote:

> >
> > --- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "John"

<three2theroyal@y...>

> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Check the source....the NYTimes. And if it were a

classified

> > cable the NYTimes would not have it, and the reporter would
> disappear
> > in a flash. Use your head instead of constantly surfing for
> nonsense
> > > that fits your loser scenario.
> > >
> > > So, the NYT isn't a reliable source for news!! Theri

reporters

> woul
> > > disappear in a flash. Are'nt these the same guys who

reported

> the
> > > Pentagon Papers?? Who disappeared then. ASS-CLOWN. LIAR.
> > > PROPAGANDIST. What do you consider a reliable news source??

You

> > have said that every mainstream rag I have mentioned isn't.

Maybe

> you
> > and the morine only trust the Richmond Post-Dispatch.
> >
> > Like I said, read what you wrote and then use your head--
> whatever's left of it anyway.
>
> You're nuts. Just tell me what you mean. If you even know

yourself.

Read my first response. If you don't get it then blame it on the
napalm.

Agent Orange, maybe. Napalm, never smelled it. So answer the
question, butt-cheese.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "deadin7" <deadin7@y...> wrote:

Here's a hint----CLASSIFIED. Geez, it's like talking to a pre-
schooler all over again. And I love gorgonzola.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "John" <three2theroyal@y...> wrote:

> > > > > Check the source....the NYTimes. And if it were a
classified
> > > cable the NYTimes would not have it, and the reporter would
> > disappear
> > > in a flash. Use your head instead of constantly surfing for
> > nonsense
> > > > that fits your loser scenario.
> > > >
> > > > So, the NYT isn't a reliable source for news!! Theri
reporters
> > woul
> > > > disappear in a flash. Are'nt these the same guys who
reported
> > the
> > > > Pentagon Papers?? Who disappeared then. ASS-CLOWN. LIAR.
> > > > PROPAGANDIST. What do you consider a reliable news source??
You
> > > have said that every mainstream rag I have mentioned isn't.
Maybe
> > you
> > > and the morine only trust the Richmond Post-Dispatch.
> > >
> > > Like I said, read what you wrote and then use your head--
> > whatever's left of it anyway.
> >
> > You're nuts. Just tell me what you mean. If you even know
yourself.
>
> Read my first response. If you don't get it then blame it on the
> napalm.

Agent Orange, maybe. Napalm, never smelled it. So answer the
question, butt-cheese.

Damn Rob, lead story on all three network nightly news shows is
something about a leaked CIA memo that we "were never supposed to
see". Things don't look too good for w's personal agenda war. Sure
would be a shame if somebody got impeached or something. Looks like
you blew the call on this one too. You are batting about 0 so try
harder. mmm-k?

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "John" <three2theroyal@y...>

wrote:

>
> > > > > > Check the source....the NYTimes. And if it were a
> classified
> > > > cable the NYTimes would not have it, and the reporter

would

> > > disappear
> > > > in a flash. Use your head instead of constantly surfing

for

> > > nonsense
> > > > > that fits your loser scenario.
> > > > >
> > > > > So, the NYT isn't a reliable source for news!! Theri
> reporters
> > > woul
> > > > > disappear in a flash. Are'nt these the same guys who
> reported
> > > the
> > > > > Pentagon Papers?? Who disappeared then. ASS-CLOWN. LIAR.
> > > > > PROPAGANDIST. What do you consider a reliable news

source??

> You
> > > > have said that every mainstream rag I have mentioned

isn't.

> Maybe
> > > you
> > > > and the morine only trust the Richmond Post-Dispatch.
> > > >
> > > > Like I said, read what you wrote and then use your head--
> > > whatever's left of it anyway.
> > >
> > > You're nuts. Just tell me what you mean. If you even know
> yourself.
> >
> > Read my first response. If you don't get it then blame it on

the

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "deadin7" <deadin7@y...> wrote:

> > napalm.
>
> Agent Orange, maybe. Napalm, never smelled it. So answer the
> question, butt-cheese.

Here's a hint----CLASSIFIED. Geez, it's like talking to a pre-
schooler all over again. And I love gorgonzola.

Damn Rob, lead story on all three network nightly news shows is
something about a leaked CIA memo that we "were never supposed to
see". Things don't look too good for w's personal agenda war. Sure
would be a shame if somebody got impeached or something. Looks like
you blew the call on this one too. You are batting about 0 so try
harder. mmm-k?

First I'd say I'm batting 1.000. Remember who won the election.....
Next, all 3 major networks are pawns to the NY Times and get their
feed from them. But that doesn't matter anyway, because Fox News out-
polled all 3 majors PLUS CNN combined! And that wasn't their lead
story. Don't be so overcome by the 'mysterious' meme either. You get
to see what 'they' want you to see every time. There's reasons for
everything. But most of your comment has to do with GWB again, and
your sour grapes over his victory. Even when you don't say it you do.
And that's what I love about you. When you try to make believe you're

>
> --- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "John" <three2theroyal@y...>
wrote:
> >
> > > > > > > Check the source....the NYTimes. And if it were a
> > classified
> > > > > cable the NYTimes would not have it, and the reporter
would
> > > > disappear
> > > > > in a flash. Use your head instead of constantly surfing
for
> > > > nonsense
> > > > > > that fits your loser scenario.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > So, the NYT isn't a reliable source for news!! Theri
> > reporters
> > > > woul
> > > > > > disappear in a flash. Are'nt these the same guys who
> > reported
> > > > the
> > > > > > Pentagon Papers?? Who disappeared then. ASS-CLOWN.

LIAR.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "John" <three2theroyal@y...> wrote:
on top, I'm still looking down at you with a great big smile. > > --- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "deadin7" <deadin7@y...> wrote:

> > > > > > PROPAGANDIST. What do you consider a reliable news
source??
> > You
> > > > > have said that every mainstream rag I have mentioned
isn't.
> > Maybe
> > > > you
> > > > > and the morine only trust the Richmond Post-Dispatch.
> > > > >
> > > > > Like I said, read what you wrote and then use your head--
> > > > whatever's left of it anyway.
> > > >
> > > > You're nuts. Just tell me what you mean. If you even know
> > yourself.
> > >
> > > Read my first response. If you don't get it then blame it on
the
> > > napalm.
> >
> > Agent Orange, maybe. Napalm, never smelled it. So answer the
> > question, butt-cheese.
>
> Here's a hint----CLASSIFIED. Geez, it's like talking to a pre-
> schooler all over again. And I love gorgonzola.

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "John" <three2theroyal@y...>

wrote:

>
> Damn Rob, lead story on all three network nightly news shows is
> something about a leaked CIA memo that we "were never supposed

to

> see". Things don't look too good for w's personal agenda war.

Sure

> would be a shame if somebody got impeached or something. Looks

like

> you blew the call on this one too. You are batting about 0 so

try

> harder. mmm-k?

First I'd say I'm batting 1.000. Remember who won the election.....
Next, all 3 major networks are pawns to the NY Times

If all of the major news networks are pawns, then how did w get
elected?? If all the news was slanted the republican party shouldn't
even exist anymore?? Explain it to me, oh enlightened one.

and get their
feed from them. But that doesn't matter anyway, because Fox News

out-

polled all 3 majors PLUS CNN combined!

In what respect? Give me your source.

And that wasn't their lead
story. Don't be so overcome by the 'mysterious' meme either. You

get

to see what 'they' want you to see every time. There's reasons for
everything.

OK Rob, tell me what they let you see!! I won't tell anybody
else.....I promise.

But most of your comment has to do with GWB again, and
your sour grapes over his victory. Even when you don't say it you

do.

And that's what I love about you.

You love me???..I'm touched…really…BUT I'M NOT A
FAG…BACK OFF AND LOVE SOME OTHER GUY, FAGGOT!!

When you try to make believe you're
on top, I'm still looking down at you with a great big smile.

From the sounds of things, you'd rather I be looking down at you
with a big smile. Don't bite, Robbie.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "deadin7" <deadin7@y...> wrote:

>

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "John" <three2theroyal@y...>
wrote:

> First I'd say I'm batting 1.000. Remember who won the

election.....Next, all 3 major networks are pawns to the NY Times

If all of the major news networks are pawns, then how did w get
elected?? If all the news was slanted the republican party

shouldn't even exist anymore?? Explain it to me, oh enlightened one.

W got elected thru the American people possessing common sense. The
more BS the liberal networks & Media reports, the more the American
people want to see someone in there who doesn't support that kind of
stuff. Another reason your boy-fairy lost and is wimpering in the
arms of mama ketchup.

> and get their
> feed from them. But that doesn't matter anyway, because Fox News
out-polled all 3 majors PLUS CNN combined!

In what respect? Give me your source.

In viewers. Those polls are taken every week, and for the past 4
months what I said has been true. Source: Bill O'Reilly. And guess
which anchor is the one who reports with the most common sense?

>And that wasn't their lead
> story. Don't be so overcome by the 'mysterious' memo either. You
get to see what 'they' want you to see every time. There's reasons

for everything.

OK Rob, tell me what they let you see!! I won't tell anybody
else.....I promise.

I see the story is highly inaccurate because no classified info
would ever pass into such hands. And if it did then the memo was
strategically written for that purpose only and for reasons none of
us need to know. Use your head.

> But most of your comment has to do with GWB again, and
> your sour grapes over his victory. Even when you don't say it

you do. And that's what I love about you.

You love me???..I'm touched…really…BUT I'M NOT A
FAG…BACK OFF AND LOVE SOME OTHER GUY, FAGGOT!!

Again, read what I wrote.

> When you try to make believe you're
> on top, I'm still looking down at you with a great big smile.

From the sounds of things, you'd rather I be looking down at you
with a big smile. Don't bite, Robbie.

Or maybe your wife.....27 years ago.
FYI: In order to give you and your pal Dicky a break from being
totally humiliated and constantly ridiculed by me (and deservedly so
on both counts) I'm going camping for a few days. Starting now. So
you've got that much time to re-build your confidence, and the
Dicker has a few days to spend in front of the machines trying to
win $700,000 so he has something to show me.

And that's what I love about you.
>
> You love me???..I'm touched…really…BUT I'M NOT A
> FAG…BACK OFF AND LOVE SOME OTHER GUY, FAGGOT!!

Again, read what I wrote.
>
> > When you try to make believe you're
> > on top, I'm still looking down at you with a great big smile.
>
> From the sounds of things, you'd rather I be looking down at you
> with a big smile. Don't bite, Robbie.

Or maybe your wife.....27 years ago.
FYI: In order to give you and your pal Dicky a break from being
totally humiliated and constantly ridiculed by me (and deservedly

so

on both counts) I'm going camping for a few days. Starting now.

Going camping, how fun. You and your fella, together, in the same
bag....yummy. hahahahaha!!!! Wath out for the deer ticks, Robbie. I
wouldn't want you to get lyme disease. And, please, use a condom.
You don't want to get aids.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "deadin7" <deadin7@y...> wrote:

27 years ago my dead wife was 15 years old. So, beside being a
compassionate conservative you are also a pedophile??
I'm learning a lot more about you than I had hoped. I see now why
you have the views that you do.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "deadin7" <deadin7@y...> wrote:

Or maybe your wife.....27 years ago.

You're just a tad slow on this. Understandable though.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "John" <three2theroyal@y...> wrote:

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "deadin7" <deadin7@y...> wrote:
>
> Or maybe your wife.....27 years ago.

27 years ago my dead wife was 15 years old. So, beside being a
compassionate conservative you are also a pedophile??
I'm learning a lot more about you than I had hoped. I see now why
you have the views that you do.

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "John" <three2theroyal@y...>

wrote:

>
> --- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "deadin7" <deadin7@y...>

wrote:

> >
> > Or maybe your wife.....27 years ago.
>
> 27 years ago my dead wife was 15 years old. So, beside being a
> compassionate conservative you are also a pedophile??
> I'm learning a lot more about you than I had hoped. I see now

why

> you have the views that you do.

You're just a tad slow on this. Understandable though.

You are the one who went camping with you boyfriend and left the
thread. If you look back over all the posts of the last several
days, you will see that you are the one who is a little slow in
replying. Understandably so.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "deadin7" <deadin7@y...> wrote:

You're hunting for words now, and you're wandering. Whenever you
repeat what another just said about you (like the lesson I'm giving
Dicky with Pee Wee Herman) you lose any credibility you had (and you
really have had none at all anyway, so you're below zero at this
point).

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "John" <three2theroyal@y...> wrote:

> > > Or maybe your wife.....27 years ago.
> >
> > 27 years ago my dead wife was 15 years old. So, beside being a
> > compassionate conservative you are also a pedophile??
> > I'm learning a lot more about you than I had hoped. I see now
why you have the views that you do.
>
> You're just a tad slow on this. Understandable though.

You are the one who went camping with you boyfriend and left the
thread. If you look back over all the posts of the last several
days, you will see that you are the one who is a little slow in
replying. Understandably so.

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "John" <three2theroyal@y...>

wrote:

>
> > > > Or maybe your wife.....27 years ago.
> > >
> > > 27 years ago my dead wife was 15 years old. So, beside being

a

> > > compassionate conservative you are also a pedophile??
> > > I'm learning a lot more about you than I had hoped. I see

now

> why you have the views that you do.
> >
> > You're just a tad slow on this. Understandable though.
>
> You are the one who went camping with you boyfriend and left the
> thread. If you look back over all the posts of the last several
> days, you will see that you are the one who is a little slow in
> replying. Understandably so.

You're hunting for words now, and you're wandering. Whenever you
repeat what another just said about you (like the lesson I'm

giving

Dicky with Pee Wee Herman) you lose any credibility you had (and

you

really have had none at all anyway, so you're below zero at this
point).

What are you talking about. I am clever and concise and am not sure
what you and Dick have going on. I only read posts that are of
interest, no matter how little, to me. One of your books is on eBay.
$5.50 including postage. Pricey for manure.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "deadin7" <deadin7@y...> wrote:

>
> You're hunting for words now, and you're wandering. Whenever you
> repeat what another just said about you (like the lesson I'm
giving Dicky with Pee Wee Herman) you lose any credibility you had

(and you really have had none at all anyway, so you're below zero at
this
point).

What are you talking about. I am clever and concise and am not sure
what you and Dick have going on. I only read posts that are of
interest, no matter how little, to me. One of your books is on

eBay. $5.50 including postage. Pricey for manure.

If you were ever clever and concise it was while you were still in
the womb, because you haven't taken it with you, that's for sure. And
the Dicker would lambast you for saying you were clever unless you
said he was too. He that kind of jealous fanatic. $5.50 on e-bay? I
get hundreds of Dick-type players who buy my book, read it twice,
then sell it for more gambling money. There are no play strategies in
either. Successful players don't sell their strategy----they give it
away for free as they can see on my site.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "John" <three2theroyal@y...> wrote:

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "John" <three2theroyal@y...>

wrote:

One of your books is on
eBay. $5.50 including postage. Pricey for manure.

If you were ever clever and concise it was while you were still in
the womb, because you haven't taken it with you, that's for sure.

And

the Dicker would lambast you for saying you were clever unless you
said he was too. He that kind of jealous fanatic. $5.50 on e-bay?

I

get hundreds of Dick-type players who buy my book, read it twice,
then sell it for more gambling money. There are no play strategies

in

either. Successful players don't sell their strategy----they give

it

away for free as they can see on my site.

No need to go to your site. I get my fertilizer at the store. At
least then I know the kind of shit I'm getting.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "deadin7" <deadin7@y...> wrote: