Casino Smoking Comments From NJ

[bandstand54]

In a message dated 2/16/2008 11:36:16 A.M. Eastern Standard Time,
vp_free@yahoo.com writes:

In accordance with vpFREE Posting Guideline #5: "Never post
lengthy copyrighted material verbatim without permission.
Instead, post a link to the material and/or a summary", I have
deleted Message #85021.

Here's a link to the deleted article, with readers comments on
the casino smoke ruling:

_http://tinyurl.http://tin_ (http://tinyurl.com/22mj3b)

<a href="_http://tinyurl.http://tin_ (http://tinyurl.com/22mj3b) ">
_http://tinyurl.http://tin_ (http://tinyurl.com/22mj3b) </a>

Permission from whom? The newspaper encourages sending copies of its
contents.

**************The year's hottest artists on the red carpet at the Grammy
Awards. Go to AOL Music.
(http://music.aol.com/grammys?NCID=aolcmp00300000002565)

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[vpFREE3]

In accordance with vpFREE Posting Guideline #5: "Never post
lengthy copyrighted material verbatim without permission.
Instead, post a link to the material and/or a summary", I have
deleted Message #85021.

Permission from whom?

From the copyright owner(s), and in this case might include all
of the commenters.

The newspaper encourages sending copies of its contents.

IANAL, but I don't know that the newspaper has the authority
to authorize verbatim quoting in this case. And, I don't see anything
on the page that encourages sending copies of the contents, which
would probably mean sending a link if it did.

Also, anytime permission has been granted, it should be prominently
indicated in the post, so that I don't have to look for it.

vpFREE Administrator

···

--- BANDSTAND54@AOL.COM wrote: