Very well put!!!
Sometimes it seems that the attitude is simply to beat the #$@%% out of the
casinos for the heck of it--long-term expectations be damned!!!
Rick
n a message dated 6/24/2003 6:48:55 PM Pacific Standard Time, vpFREE@Cox.net
writes:
Since anyone can join vpFREE and other forums by using an alias or a
friend's name, we should expect casino executives to monitor the VP
internet forums. I certainly would if I were in their shoes.I know there are some casino lurkers on vpFREE, and the Lodestone News
cover page mentions four casinos known to monitor that site.Advantage VP players are, and should be, very concerned about saving
advantage VP opportunities, but IMO the casinos aren't (or shouldn't be)
our enemy. They should/could view advantage players as loss leaders,
and heavily promote our existence and the beatability of positive VP, to
exponentially increase the universe of VP enthusiasts, most of whom will
never play with an edge. Personally, I want casinos to do well, so that
they can afford to host my VP playing, and subsidize my monthly income.I welcome a casino presence on vpFREE, because I believe that their exposure
to our ideas and preferences can be beneficial to us and to them. I would
also welcome their active participation on vpFREE, which would provide a twoway channel of communications.
vpFREE Administrator
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]