Agreed, but I didn't write that. I was responding to the guy who did.
John
---- Stuart <sresnick2@comcast.net> wrote:
···
--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, John Kelly <lodestone@...> wrote:
> They figure you'll eventually play what's there or will play
> underfunded and lose on one of their rare full-pays anyway.From the casino's profit point of view, they DON'T want players who
play at an advantage, and they DON'T want players who take up seats
which would otherwise be filled with a player who'd lose more.
Everybody else, they DO want.Underfunded isn't the issue. They want your business, or they don't,
but there's no case where the casino wants your business and would
prefer you to be underfunded.Stuart (RandomStu)
http://home.comcast.net/~sresnick2/fungames.htm