Thank goodness it wasn't more than twice.....
--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "Jonathan"
<diversified_slave@y...> wrote:
Actually, your god: Ronnie (That's right, mommy, I'm dead.) Reagan
used it on severel occasions.--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@c...>
wrote:
>
> --- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...>
wrote:
> > Pot-kettle-black.
>
> I know you're usually left speechless when trying to respond to
truth
> and reason, but what generation does that set of words come
from???
>
> > --- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111"
<rsinger1111@c...>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > RGM--You're like an insecure born-again non-committal who
runs
> > around
> > > forums making believe he knows more than anyone who posts
reason.
> > > You're neurosis to correct others whom you don't agree with
> > > exacerbates your reputation as someone who's "trying to set
the
> > > record straight" only in a world of his own, because you have
as
> > much
> > > effect here as Bush-haters do in the US. All that gambling
> > certainly
> > > does seem to have eroded something.
> > >
> > > --- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain"
<rgmustain@a...>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > --- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "mickeycrimm"
> > <mickeycrimm@y...>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Iraq is about oil, period. It's about securing a supply
of
> oil
> > > for
> > > > > decades to come. No politician wants to admit that, but
> that's
> > > the
> > > > > truth. That's the ulterior motive. That doesn't make it
a
> bad
> > > > > thing. Without oil this country is screwed. Even that
tofu
> > the
> > > > > whining liberals eat comes by truck.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > I must assume you didn't vote for Bush in the last election
> since
> > > he
> > > > lied to you about Iraq ...
> > > >
> > > > By the way, I also believe oil was a major consideration.
> > However,
> > > > IMO it's MORE about the GWBs' oil company buddies making
> obscene
> > > > profits than it is about you and I getting the oil.
> > > >
> > > > There was NO immediate threat of oil problems before the
war
> (in
> > > fact
> > > > the war has increased the threat). OPECs livelihood depends
on
> > > > selling oil and they have nothing to gain by cutting off
the
> > > > supply ... even for decades to come and our reliance on oil
> > > subsides
> > > > due to hybrids/fuel cells/etc.
> > > >
> > > > It seems to me there is little justification for a
statement
ยทยทยท
> > > > like "Iraq is about oil, period." Of course, I doubt I will
> ever
> > > > change your mind.
> > > >
> > > > PS. I'm not a liberal.
> > > >
> > >
> >
>