Bowling B.S.

[vpFREE3]

I've been reading these posts for some time now and can't quite
understand.

Party #1 - I'll bowl you anytime for any amount of money.
Party #2 - You'll back out so I won't agree to it.
Party #1 - I'll bowl you anytime for any amoutn of money.
Party #2 - Okay then, I'll add some conditions.

This seems like a no brainer. Even I can understand it.

The person who claims to be a professional bowling is backing out of
what seems to be "lock."

I have a solution. Maybe if each strike rolled generates some sort
of "slot club" points Party #2 will then agree.

Is Party #2 an idiot

···

Date: Sun, 21 May 2006 20:22:17 -0000
To: FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com
From: "Rick Bronstein" <rick@greensky.com>
Subject: Bowling B.S.

[Rob_Singer1]

I can help. I accepted all conditions just to bowl the paducah. All
I require in return is a $25k forfeit fee--which must be in escrow
NLT June 10th. He so far has declined because he's concerned about
his knee, which apparently was injured in the past. I'm in great
shape for my age, but it is an age where anything can happen anyway.
I won't go forward without it, so it's up to him (isn't it always).
Bowl or fold. Cash or crash.

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, vpFREE Administrator <vp_free@...>
wrote:

Date: Sun, 21 May 2006 20:22:17 -0000
To: FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com
From: "Rick Bronstein" <rick@...>
Subject: Bowling B.S.

I've been reading these posts for some time now and can't quite
understand.

Party #1 - I'll bowl you anytime for any amount of money.
Party #2 - You'll back out so I won't agree to it.
Party #1 - I'll bowl you anytime for any amoutn of money.
Party #2 - Okay then, I'll add some conditions.

This seems like a no brainer. Even I can understand it.

The person who claims to be a professional bowling is backing out

of

···

what seems to be "lock."

I have a solution. Maybe if each strike rolled generates some sort
of "slot club" points Party #2 will then agree.

Is Party #2 an idiot

[rgmustain]

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, vpFREE Administrator <vp_free@...>
wrote:

Date: Sun, 21 May 2006 20:22:17 -0000
To: FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com
From: "Rick Bronstein" <rick@...>
Subject: Bowling B.S.

I've been reading these posts for some time now and can't quite
understand.

Read more carefully.

Party #1 - I'll bowl you anytime for any amount of money.
Party #2 - You'll back out so I won't agree to it.
Party #1 - I'll bowl you anytime for any amoutn of money.
Party #2 - Okay then, I'll add some conditions.

None of these statements has been made by either party. Maybe you
should go back and read more carefully.

This seems like a no brainer. Even I can understand it.

The person who claims to be a professional bowling is backing out

of

what seems to be "lock."

What part of "YES" didn't you understand? And, why would you post a
note that has no correlation with the facts?

I have a solution. Maybe if each strike rolled generates some sort
of "slot club" points Party #2 will then agree.

Is Party #2 an idiot

Based on this note I think it's pretty well established who's
an "idiot".