vpFREE2 Forums

Bonus Poker Deluxe w/ Seq Royal

Sorry, failed to complete the thought.

So, following Mickey's example, the average Royal would be 4000 X 5 + 50,000
= 70,000 / 6 = 11,666.

Certainly, holding the AT in the proper position is correct over just the A,
penalty cards notwithstanding. Probably, it's better than anything less than
an inside straight with three high cards.

Brian

···

=====================================

In a message dated 3/2/2008 8:41:59 AM Pacific Standard Time,
bjaygold@aol.com writes:

I believe the sequential pays $12,500 = 50,000 coins on a quarter machine.

**************Ideas to please picky eaters. Watch video on AOL Living.
(http://living.aol.com/video/how-to-please-your-picky-eater/rachel-campos-duffy/
2050827?NCID=aolcmp00300000002598)

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Sorry, failed to complete the thought.

So, following Mickey's example, the average Royal would be 4000 X 5

+ 50,000

= 70,000 / 6 = 11,666.

Certainly, holding the AT in the proper position is correct over

just the A,

penalty cards notwithstanding. Probably, it's better than anything

less than

an inside straight with three high cards.

When I wanted to determine the required strategy changes for the
sequential royals at Circus Circus (aces and eights) I used Wolf
Video Poker (WVP). You can download it and try it for free at
wolfvideopoker.com .

Dick

···

--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, bjaygold@... wrote:

FVP software also offers the capability of figuring sequential royals, one way or both ways.

···

________________
Jean $�ott
http://queenofcomps.com/

New blog taking the place of
Frugal Fridays. Go to
http://lasvegasadvisor.com/
and click on "Frugal Vegas."

Look at it this way! If you hold the AT and you get the 3 intermediate cards in the right place, you will be estatic, if you only hold the A and the other 3 come up in order, oh well?
   
  Assuming you will get a royal (conditional probability) there are 3X2X1 way for those 3 cards to fit in the middle thus 1/6 of the time that you get a royal with the A -10 on the outside will it be sequential (remember this is only if you get the royal) as from the get go the chance of a sequential in either direction is 1/60 (assuming again you get the royal) but you all know what assume means -FTWD (for those who don't) assume = ass u me -This is one case where the psychological play might be better than the mathematical play? I know when there are runners at the corners (1st and 3rd) I go for the hit (i.e., A-10 either direction on the outside) I play for it.
   
  If I have misse danything please let me know. Thanks

Sorry, failed to complete the thought.

So, following Mickey's example, the average Royal would be 4000 X 5

+ 50,000

= 70,000 / 6 = 11,666.

Certainly, holding the AT in the proper position is correct over

just the A,

penalty cards notwithstanding. Probably, it's better than anything

less than

an inside straight with three high cards.

When I wanted to determine the required strategy changes for the
sequential royals at Circus Circus (aces and eights) I used Wolf
Video Poker (WVP). You can download it and try it for free at
wolfvideopoker.com .

Dick

···

mroejacks <rgmustain@aol.com> wrote:
          --- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, bjaygold@... wrote:

---------------------------------
Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with Yahoo! Search.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]