Bob Dancer's LVA - 5 MAY 2015
More on Auto-Hold
http://www.lasvegasadvisor.com/bob_dancer/2015/0505.cfm
*************************************************
This link is posted for informational purposes
and doesn't constitute an endorsement or approval
of the linked article's content by vpFREE. Any
discussion of the article must be done in
accordance with vpFREE's rules and policies.
*************************************************
In my opinion the manufacturer should be declaring what level of strategy the auto hold is using.
i.e. They could say that the strategy they are using is 100% perfect strategy, or 99.7% strategy or any other type of a strategy that they choose.
As long as they declare what they are doing I don’t see why any reasonable person would have a problem. If they don’t declare what they are doing then one could play it for a while and look at the suggested holds and then determine if they like that method of play or not.
Regards
A.P.
From: mailto:vpF…@…com
Sent: Tuesday, May 05, 2015 1:32 PM
To: vpFREE@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [vpFREE] Bob Dancer's LVA - 5 MAY 2015
Bob Dancer's LVA - 5 MAY 2015
More on Auto-Hold
http://www.lasvegasadvisor.com/bob_dancer/2015/0505.cfm
*************************************************
This link is posted for informational purposes
and doesn't constitute an endorsement or approval
of the linked article's content by vpFREE. Any
discussion of the article must be done in
accordance with vpFREE's rules and policies.
*************************************************
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
O
Only a fool would assume that a vp machine with auto-hold, for which the underlying strategy is unqualified, employs an optimal strategy. (Of course, casinos and fools hold a strong attraction to each other.)
Frankly, I see no reason why such a strategy need be optimal, or even near-optimal. There are no explicit or implied warranties to that effect.
My own vested interest in the subject would desire a sub-optimal strategy that creates room for an advantageous play.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]