vpFREE2 Forums

Bob Dancer's LV Advisor Column - 9 JUL 2013

#1

So you're saying the casino "forgot" to remove the hi-limit slots even though they strategically removed the hi-limit vp machines....so as a sure thing/easy money/all-balls fix, they chose to ban those who played them and knowingly accepted the coming lawsuits from all these "on the up & up" anonymous, but now legendary, players?

It sure is baffling that someone wants to bet $1k on hearsay and anonymous postings from the Internet. How will a winner be determined? Seems to me we'd have to wait for the hearing and Revel has to ADMIT to doing that to players with real names.

···

----- Reply message -----
From: "Mickey" <mickeycrimm@yahoo.com>
To: <vpFREE@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: [vpFREE] Re: Bob Dancer's LV Advisor Column - 9 JUL 2013
Date: Wed, Jul 10, 2013 3:38 pm
It was reported in the WoV thread early on that in the first couple of days of the promotion players who were hammering the $25 slots and the one $100 slot were being disqualified from the promotion. I suspect these are the people who are going to sue. There is no way to manipulate the card on those slots. And I suspect that these players were the sharpest, biggest bankrolled players in the house, and had enough moxie to stay away from card manipulation.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

#2

I already said how the bet would be resolved. If you have another suggestion, go ahead.

Casinos are very reactionary institutions. We just saw the palms change their bingo promotion after they lost too much money. We see stuff like this every month. The removal of high denom vp was most likely a reaction to the Internet analysis of it.

···

--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rob.singer1111@yahoo.com" <rob.singer1111@...> wrote:

So you're saying the casino "forgot" to remove the hi-limit slots even though they strategically removed the hi-limit vp machines....so as a sure thing/easy money/all-balls fix, they chose to ban those who played them and knowingly accepted the coming lawsuits from all these "on the up & up" anonymous, but now legendary, players?

It sure is baffling that someone wants to bet $1k on hearsay and anonymous postings from the Internet. How will a winner be determined? Seems to me we'd have to wait for the hearing and Revel has to ADMIT to doing that to players with real names.

----- Reply message -----
From: "Mickey" <mickeycrimm@...>
To: <vpFREE@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: [vpFREE] Re: Bob Dancer's LV Advisor Column - 9 JUL 2013
Date: Wed, Jul 10, 2013 3:38 pm
It was reported in the WoV thread early on that in the first couple of days of the promotion players who were hammering the $25 slots and the one $100 slot were being disqualified from the promotion. I suspect these are the people who are going to sue. There is no way to manipulate the card on those slots. And I suspect that these players were the sharpest, biggest bankrolled players in the house, and had enough moxie to stay away from card manipulation.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

#3

had letter from Harrahs with a large match play stated on it which Revel was supposed to match "up to $500.00"---they only woyld match it up to $250.00---did not argue as I didn't want to create a fuss and lose my card and the free play occurred because of some other issues---but it was free play---has anyone had a large demonination matched /
                 
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

#4

So are you saying that it was NOT a MAILED offer? What do you mean the "freeplay occurred because of some other issues"? It is my understanding that the match offer was only good for MAILED freeplay offers. If you got that freeplay because they were fixing an issue you had with the casino then I would think it would not be eligible at all. From what I am hearing it sounds like you are pretty lucky they gave you the $250.

···

________________________________
From: Kristine Hood <KcjHood@msn.com>
To: "vpFREE@yahoogroups.com" <vpfree@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2013 11:21 AM
Subject: [vpFREE] Revel Promotion---failure to match

had letter from Harrahs with a large match play stated on it which Revel was supposed to match "up to $500.00"---they only woyld match it up to $250.00---did not argue as I didn't want to create a fuss and lose my card and the free play occurred because of some other issues---but it was free play---has anyone had a large demonination matched /

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

#5

No, it was a mailed offer and it simply states "please accept our offer of free slot play" on such and such days

···

To: vpFREE@yahoogroups.com
From: stevebork@yahoo.com
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2013 09:29:08 -0700
Subject: Re: [vpFREE] Revel Promotion---failure to match

      So are you saying that it was NOT a MAILED offer? What do you mean the "freeplay occurred because of some other issues"? It is my understanding that the match offer was only good for MAILED freeplay offers. If you got that freeplay because they were fixing an issue you had with the casino then I would think it would not be eligible at all. From what I am hearing it sounds like you are pretty lucky they gave you the $250.

________________________________

From: Kristine Hood <KcjHood@msn.com>

To: "vpFREE@yahoogroups.com" <vpfree@yahoogroups.com>

Sent: Monday, July 15, 2013 11:21 AM

Subject: [vpFREE] Revel Promotion---failure to match

had letter from Harrahs with a large match play stated on it which Revel was supposed to match "up to $500.00"---they only woyld match it up to $250.00---did not argue as I didn't want to create a fuss and lose my card and the free play occurred because of some other issues---but it was free play---has anyone had a large demonination matched /

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]