Do the words, "consider the source" mean anything to you?
If a little leaguer insults you, an established major league player, would
you care? I would not.
In addition, the person in question craves attention, and seeks to provoke a
response. Ignoring him is ALWAYS the smart thing to do!
Did you forget where your CapsLock key is? Or is this not truly Mickey
Crimm--the whole style, prose, and attitude seem totally different to me from
previous posts. Just an impression, I could be mistaken.
Brian (not BD, and not attempting to speak for him)
···
----------------------------------------------------------------
In a message dated 6/10/2006 6:10:11 AM Pacific Standard Time,
mickeycrimm@yahoo.com writes:
--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "Bob Dancer" <bob.dancer@...> wrote:
Mickey Crimm asked: Bob, I respectfully have to ask this question.
Why
do you go after Dan
Paymar but give Rob Singer a free pass?Mickey: Your question is respectful enough, but even a
straightforward
answer on my part will have the likelihood of creating another
brouhaha
on this site which could possibly lead to my banishment --- which
is a
result I do not wish. I therefore decline to answer your question.
FREEVPFREE IS AVAILABLE
I will say, though, that it is not a one-way street between Dan and
me.
Dan has made his share of anti-Dancer provocative remarks along the
way.
DAN'S REMARKS ARE ALWAYS IN RESPONSE TO YOUR REMARKS. THEY PALE IN
COMPARISON TO THE SUPER TRASHING YOU HAVE TAKEN FROM ROB SINGER FOR
MANY YEARS NOW. SINGER IS THE UNDISPUTED KING ON ANTI-DANCER
COMMENTS.
YET NEVER A RESPONSE FROM YOU. YOUR RESPONSE TO MY POST IS A CLEAR
EXAMPLE. ONCE AGAIN YOU HAVE FAILED TO REFER TO SINGER IN EVEM A
VEILED FASHION.
SO LET ME MODIFY MY ORIGINAL QUESTION LEAVING DAN PAYMAR OUT OF IT.
WHY DO YOU GIVE ROB SINGER A FREE PASS?
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]